RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      자유학기제에 대한 중학교 교사들의 인식

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100537922

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study aimed to investigate how middle school teachers perceived major features of the ‘Free Learning Semester'. In 2013, the Free Learning Semester has been proposed by Korean government to provide students with the educational programs which deals with various activities in classroom in order to increase student's learning ability. The Free Learning Semester helps students to figure out their dreams and develops their talents. The government plans to expand the Free Learning Semester to all middle schools by 2016. Since teacher’s perception is an important matter in the application of the Free Learning Semester, this study seeks to document the changes in curriculum by observing the perception of teachers in the school that implemented the Free Learning Semesters and those that did not implemented the Free Learning Semesters. 172 teachers from nine middle schools in Busan that their school schedules allowed were surveyed. Two school which operated the Free Learning Semester were compared to seven schools which did not operate the Free Learning Semester. The results are summarized as follows: First, almost all (97.7%) teachers in the Free Learning Semester schools have completed a training whereas 74.6% of the teachers in the non-Free Learning Semester schools have not. The usefulness of the training was satisfactory, but the teachers in the Free Learning Semester Schools wanted more practical help with the curriculum. Second, the result, which was statistically significant(p<.05), revealed that the first grade second semester of middle school was the best time to implement the Free Learning Semester. In order for its successful establishment in schools, there needs to be a reliable and effective evaluation system. However, the results regarding the introduction and management of the new system were not statistically significant. Lastly, in the Free Learning Semester Schools, the changes in teachers’ perception were statistically significant (p<.05). The results show that the teachers need the training and the teacher's community to implement the curriculum and set a basis for valuation.
      번역하기

      This study aimed to investigate how middle school teachers perceived major features of the ‘Free Learning Semester'. In 2013, the Free Learning Semester has been proposed by Korean government to provide students with the educational programs which...

      This study aimed to investigate how middle school teachers perceived major features of the ‘Free Learning Semester'. In 2013, the Free Learning Semester has been proposed by Korean government to provide students with the educational programs which deals with various activities in classroom in order to increase student's learning ability. The Free Learning Semester helps students to figure out their dreams and develops their talents. The government plans to expand the Free Learning Semester to all middle schools by 2016. Since teacher’s perception is an important matter in the application of the Free Learning Semester, this study seeks to document the changes in curriculum by observing the perception of teachers in the school that implemented the Free Learning Semesters and those that did not implemented the Free Learning Semesters. 172 teachers from nine middle schools in Busan that their school schedules allowed were surveyed. Two school which operated the Free Learning Semester were compared to seven schools which did not operate the Free Learning Semester. The results are summarized as follows: First, almost all (97.7%) teachers in the Free Learning Semester schools have completed a training whereas 74.6% of the teachers in the non-Free Learning Semester schools have not. The usefulness of the training was satisfactory, but the teachers in the Free Learning Semester Schools wanted more practical help with the curriculum. Second, the result, which was statistically significant(p<.05), revealed that the first grade second semester of middle school was the best time to implement the Free Learning Semester. In order for its successful establishment in schools, there needs to be a reliable and effective evaluation system. However, the results regarding the introduction and management of the new system were not statistically significant. Lastly, in the Free Learning Semester Schools, the changes in teachers’ perception were statistically significant (p<.05). The results show that the teachers need the training and the teacher's community to implement the curriculum and set a basis for valuation.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • II. 연구 내용 및 방법
      • 1. 연구대상
      • III. 연구 결과 및 논의
      • ABSTRACT
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • II. 연구 내용 및 방법
      • 1. 연구대상
      • III. 연구 결과 및 논의
      • 1. 운영학교와 미운영학교 간의 비교
      • 2. 자유학기제 운영 학교
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
      • 참고 문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정광순, "중학교 자유학기제 수업 대비 역량 중심 교과 통합수업 설계 방안 제안" 한국통합교육과정학회 7 (7): 1-30, 2013

      2 최순화, "제7차 선택중심 고등학교 과학과 교육과정의 운영 실태와 과학교사 및 학생들의 인식 조사" 대한화학회 52 (52): 96-106, 2008

      3 정진철, "인본주의 교육철학 관점에서 본 체험중심 진로교육으로서의 아일랜드 전환학년제와 영국 갭이어에 대한 내러티브 탐구" 한국농·산업교육학회 45 (45): 85-124, 2013

      4 김나라, "아일랜드 전환학년제 적용 방안 연구" 한국진로교육학회 26 (26): 21-46, 2013

      5 김진숙, "아일랜드 연계학년제(TY)와 한국 자유학기제 비교" 한국비교교육학회 23 (23): 163-183, 2013

      6 김진숙, "아일랜드 Transition Year 교육과정 탐구" 한국교육과정학회 31 (31): 165-193, 2013

      7 Department of Education and Science, "Transition Year Programme, Guidelines for Schools"

      8 Jeon, Yoon-sik, "Teachers for Psychology" Sehyun-sa 2004

      9 Park, Sam-Cheol, "Suggestion for Korea Education from Australian IBP Project" KEDI 1-31, 2013

      10 Ministry of Education, "Revised Making &Management of School Register" Daehan textbook Publishing 2013

      1 정광순, "중학교 자유학기제 수업 대비 역량 중심 교과 통합수업 설계 방안 제안" 한국통합교육과정학회 7 (7): 1-30, 2013

      2 최순화, "제7차 선택중심 고등학교 과학과 교육과정의 운영 실태와 과학교사 및 학생들의 인식 조사" 대한화학회 52 (52): 96-106, 2008

      3 정진철, "인본주의 교육철학 관점에서 본 체험중심 진로교육으로서의 아일랜드 전환학년제와 영국 갭이어에 대한 내러티브 탐구" 한국농·산업교육학회 45 (45): 85-124, 2013

      4 김나라, "아일랜드 전환학년제 적용 방안 연구" 한국진로교육학회 26 (26): 21-46, 2013

      5 김진숙, "아일랜드 연계학년제(TY)와 한국 자유학기제 비교" 한국비교교육학회 23 (23): 163-183, 2013

      6 김진숙, "아일랜드 Transition Year 교육과정 탐구" 한국교육과정학회 31 (31): 165-193, 2013

      7 Department of Education and Science, "Transition Year Programme, Guidelines for Schools"

      8 Jeon, Yoon-sik, "Teachers for Psychology" Sehyun-sa 2004

      9 Park, Sam-Cheol, "Suggestion for Korea Education from Australian IBP Project" KEDI 1-31, 2013

      10 Ministry of Education, "Revised Making &Management of School Register" Daehan textbook Publishing 2013

      11 Jones, A, "Review of gap year provision"

      12 Busan Metropolitan City Office of Education, "Report ‘Free Learning Semester’ of Baekyang Middle School" BMOE 2013

      13 Jones, A, "Reflecting on the UK gap year: Insights for South Korea’s ‘Free Learning Semester’" KRIVET 45-54, 2013

      14 Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, "Plan for Integrated Career Education" Daehan textbook Publishing 2010

      15 "Ministry of Education"

      16 "Ministry of Education"

      17 King, A, "Minding the gap? Young people’s accounts of taking a Gap Year as a form of identity work in higher education" 14 (14): 41-357, 2011

      18 Choi, Sang-Deok, "Implementation Strategy of Free Learning Semester" KEDI 1-115, 2013

      19 Sternberg, R. J, "Educational Psychology" Sigma Press 280-295, 2003

      20 Simpson, K, "Dropping out or signing up? The professionalization of youth travel" 37 (37): 447-469, 2005

      21 Lee, Ki-Bong, "Development of a Community-Based Operational Model for Experience-Based Creative Activity Ⅰ" National Youth Policy Institute 1-157, 2011

      22 Jeffers. G, "Attitudes to Transition Year. A Report to the Department of Education and Science"

      23 Choi, Sang-Deok, "A Synthetic Report of Case Analysis for Free Learning Semester School in 2013" KEDI 1-183, 2013

      24 Shin, Cheol-Gyun, "A Study of Becoming Established for Free Learning Semester" KEDI 1-361, 2014

      25 Lee, Ji-Yeon, "A Scheme for Free Learning Semester with Implementing Integrated Subjects Teaching" Korea Home Economics Education Association 23-51, 2013

      26 Chae, Jung-Hyun, "A Scheme for Free Learning Semester with Implementing Integrated Subjects Teaching" Korea Home Economics Education Association 52-61, 2013

      27 Kim, Soon-Ju, "A Scheme for Free Learning Semester with Implementing Integrated Subjects Teaching" Korea Home Economics Education Association 62-66, 2013

      28 윤회정, "2009 개정 교육과정과 융합형 과학 교과서에 대한 고등학교 과학교사들의 인식" 교과교육연구소 15 (15): 757-776, 2011

      29 엄희숙, "2009 개정 교육과정 고등학교 융합형 과학에 대한 교사와 학생의 인식 및 수업 운영 실태조사" 대한지구과학교육학회 7 (7): 203-213, 2014

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2014-01-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2010-02-11 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국지구과학교육학회 -> 대한지구과학교육학회
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.04 1.04 1.11
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.96 0.85 1.567 0.26
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼