「記夢」에 나타난 大觀齋 沈義의 비평의식

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

「記夢(Dream Records)」 was written by Sim Yei at the age of 51. While 「記夢」 deals with the world of dreams, it helps us to understand the author's view on poetry review in terms that public offices are given according to levels of poetry and poets are evaluated. While Dae Guan Jae records dreams in 「記夢」 formally, poems are reviewed based on dream-based commentaries.
Sim Yei thought that the ideal stage of poetry shall be a state devoid of vice based on proper thoughts (思無邪) and considered the natural disposition coming out of such a state to be the most important element in poetry. He thought that the proper way of poetry (詩道) could be secured based on the poetic spirit of bravery and magnificence rather than artificial steering and maintained that correctness of emotions and rhymes should be harmonized for emotions to be rhythmically delivered and arouse touching sensations. He believed that the veins of proper poetry were succeeded by Book of Songs (詩經) and Songs of Chǔ (楚辭), abundant Tang poetry (盛唐詩) (Tu Fu and Li Bo), Han Yu and Liu Zongyuan, Su Tung Po and Huang Ting-Jian and considered the abundant Tang poetry to be the poetic flow of his time.
Sim Yei thought that the most important thing when creating a poem was forging. It refers to harmony of contents and forms rather than simple beautification of words and phrases. This refers to a series of processes to provide good rhythms and combine physical properties while enjoying the contents for a long time. This also involves long-term reflection on feelings and composition of a poem (contents).
Sim Yei promoted styles such as ‘the quiet and desirelessness (平淡)’ㆍ‘unique, classic, and sophisticated (奇古)’ and maintained that poets should not be bound to rhythms or become scant when forming objects by recognizing the characteristics of poetic styles such as ‘evaluation (題咏)’ and ‘description (叙事)’. He maintained that this could be achieved as training with 『Book of Songs (詩經)』 and 『Songs of Chǔ (楚辭)』 was promoted. This was supplemented with absence of light and slight beauty based on reflection on the best parts of the bygones.
Based on this understanding, the standards of review of Sim Yei was a state devoid of vice based on proper thoughts. Based on this poetic spirit, he arranged the hierarchy of Korean and Chinese poetry and evaluated poetic creators based on this hierarchy.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김기동, "李朝時代 소설연구" 성문각 1974

2 최치원, "최문창후전집" 성대 대동문화연구원 1972

3 유 협, "문심조룡" 민음사 2005

4 정 민, "목릉문단과 석주 권필" 태학사 1999

5 서거정, "국역 동문선" 1998

6 장덕순, "국문학 통론" 신구문화사 1963

7 이규호, "詩話的 측면에서 본 大觀齋記夢" 한국한문학연구회 5 : 1981

8 최 자, "補閑集" 계명대학교 출판부 1984

9 김시양, "紫海筆談, In 대동야승" 민족문화추진회 1975

10 이인로, "破閑集" 일지사 1994

11 "燕山君日記" 민족문화추진회 1975

12 김일손, "濯纓集" 민족문화추진회 1996

13 李正善, "沈義의 <記夢>을 통해 본 葛藤克服의 樣相과 詩意識 연구" 漢陽大學校 大學院 1990

14 "朝鮮王朝實錄" 민족문화추진회 1984

15 성 현, "慵齋叢話, In 대동야승" 민족문화추진회 1975

16 홍만종, "小華詩評" 민속원 1994

17 박동량, "寄齋雜記, In 대동야승" 민족문화추진회 1975

18 심 의, "大觀齋亂稿" 민족문화추진회 1988

19 이원주, "大觀齋의 記夢·夢謝自然志考" 계명대 한국학연구소 5 : 1981

20 양언석, "大觀齋의 <記夢>연구" 명지어문학회 (21) : 1994

21 최정희, "大觀齋 沈義의 시세계 연구" 高麗大學校 敎育大學院 1999

22 김형석, "大觀齋 記夢에 반영된 심의의 현실인식 연구" 한남대 2003

23 윤해옥, "大觀齋 記夢에 나타난 寓言의 문학적 형상" 연세대국문과 13 : 1980

24 서대석, "夢遊錄의 장르적 성격과 문학사적 의의" 계명대 한국학 연구소 3 : 1975

25 신재홍, "夢遊錄의 유형적 고찰" 서울대국문학연구회 75 : 1986

26 정학성, "夢遊錄의 역사의식과 유형적 특질" 서울대 국어국문학과 2 : 1977

27 車溶柱, "夢遊錄系素 小說硏究" 高麗大學校 大學院 1979

28 엄기영, "<大觀齋記夢>의 창작 방법 연구 -창작소재를 중심으로-" 한국고소설학회 (18) : 59-84, 2004