This paper investigates the patterns of particle verb idioms in English. Particle verbs are characterized by the two word orders they permit: V-Part(icle)-NP (e.g., write down X) and V-NP-Part (e.g., write X down). Particle verb idioms requiring a fix...
This paper investigates the patterns of particle verb idioms in English. Particle verbs are characterized by the two word orders they permit: V-Part(icle)-NP (e.g., write down X) and V-NP-Part (e.g., write X down). Particle verb idioms requiring a fixed NP form three subclasses (Fraser 1970, Machonis 1985, Cappelle 2005). The first group only appears in the order where V and Part are immediately adjacent-for example, blow off steam ‘to talk or act in a way to relieve stress’, but not *blow steam off. The second group requires V and Part to be split-let one’s hair down ‘to relax and enjoy oneself’, but not *let down one’s hair. The last group allows either order-roll up one’s sleeves/roll one’s sleeves up ‘to get ready to do something difficult and intense’. I propose a symmetric analysis for particle verbs in English. The two word orders of particle verbs are represented by two distinct syntactic structures. Specifically, the verbal root functions as a modifier of result in the V-Part-NP structure and as a modifier of causation in the V-NP-Part structure. The analysis correctly predicts the above three-way distinction that particle verb idioms exhibit and captures the subtle semantic contrast between the two surface word orders (Bolinger 1977). Two additional consequences for the structure of particle verbs-(i) the presence of particle verbs with a fixed order and (ii) the restrictions on particle shift exhibited by ditransitives-are discussed.