광역권 관광개발사업 평가에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The connectivity reinforcement of specialized tourism-developmental theme only for the multi-region tourism development project and precise evaluation about the cultivation of a cooperation system with local multi-regions are required. Especially the objective evaluation is necessary that the projects achieved their objectives which had been planned and what kind of ripple effects were made by the projects. For this reason, reviewing the evaluation system as a pre-research for the objective evaluation of the multi-region tourism development projects is required. The aim of this study is to set the evaluation system which can analyze objective performance and limitation of the multi-region tourism development project after the project finished as estimate the system which is able to evaluate the multi-region tourism development project in a project planning, operating, and performance way. For this, the concept and theoretical background of the multi-region tourism development project were arranged. Second, the present state and developmental direction of the projects were suggested. Through literature review, the evaluation index of the multi-region tourism development project was developed. Finally, priority and weight of the index were developed through the survey of the experts. The survey turned out that the operation step was the most important in the multi-region tourism development evaluation. Also, the efficiency in the process of project and the adequacy of the system projects were also very important parts in the operation step. In detailed assessment items, the appropriateness of the monitoring and reflux and the adequancy of the project contents and process were suggested as important. This study, as a basic research results for the evaluation of the multi-region tourism development projects, is required to review and improve the evaluation index and measuring method which are suitable for each project to apply in reality. To evaluate the performance of projects objectively, various performance indexes have to be developed. However, the second data(tourisms destination and the number of tourists, etc.) has limits to estimate the performance in present, a development of other performance evaluation index and regular research are required. Finally, It is desired to research the performance or satisfaction level of the projects for local residents or tourists by evaluating profit of projects directly. sufficient budget for evaluation is necessary.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 엄서호, "한국적 관광개발론: 한국관광 제 빛 살리기" 백산출판사 2007

2 행정자치부, "통합행정혁신시스템: 고객과 성과중심의 업무혁신모델" 2006

3 김용웅, "지역발전론" 한울아카데미 2003

4 김덕기, "지역 관광사업 평가체계 설정에 관한 연구" 한국문화관광정책연구원 2004

5 이창균, "지방투자사업의 자율적 평가체계 구축방안" 한국지방행정연구원 2006

6 한국지방행정연구원, "지방투자사업의 자율적 평가체계 구축방안" 2006

7 한표환, "지방자치단체 지역개발사업의 평가체계 및 기법 개발" 한국지방행정연구원 1999

8 강은숙, "선진 주요국의 성과평가제도 고찰. 정책&제도 DB"

9 국회예산정책처, "사업평가방법론 연구" 2007

10 문화관광부, "문화 및 생태․녹색관광자원 개발사업 평가 연구" 2007

11 문화관광부, "남해안 관광벨트 개발사업 2차 평가 연구" 2007

12 김용웅, "광역권 개발의 방향과 집행촉진방안 연구" 국토연구원 1999

13 한국개발연구원 공공투자관리센터, "광역관광 기반시설 확충사업 심층평가" 2007

14 김영준, "광역경제권 구상과 지역관광개발의 과제" 한국문화관광연구원 2010

15 문화관광부, "관광지 개발사업 평가 연구" 2007

16 고영선, "공공부문의 성과관리" 한국개발연구원 2004

17 Behn. Robert D., "Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures" 63 (63): 586-606, 2003

18 김성일, "SOC 재정사업의 사후평가모형 구축방안 연구" 국토연구원 2006

19 European Commission, "Evaluating EU Expenditure Programmes: A Guide"

20 Saaty. T. L., "Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process" RWS Publications 1996

21 김대관, "AHP를 활용한 서남해안 관광레저도시 핵심사업 선정 집단별 의식 차이에 관한 연구" (사)한국관광레저학회 22 (22): 417-436, 2010

22 김창식, "AHP를 이용한 골프리조트 제공서비스 선택에 관한 연구" (사)한국관광레저학회 22 (22): 39-54, 2010

23 김승렬, "AHP기법을 이용한 몽골지역을 방문하는 한국인 국외관광객의 여행상품 선택에 관한 연구" (사)한국관광레저학회 22 (22): 451-465, 2010

24 지역발전위원회, "2010년도 지역발전사업 평가 계획" 2010

25 국회예산정책처, "2010 국가 주요 사업 평가: 지역특화발전특구사업 평가" 2010

26 문화체육관광부, "2009 관광동향에 관한 연차보고서" 2010