RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      감정노동, 직무소진, 조직냉소주의의 관계에서 회복탄력성의 역할: 고용센터 종사자를 대상으로 = The Role of Resilience in the Relationship Between Emotional Labor, Job Burnout, and Organizational Cynicism: A Study of Employment Center Workers

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110123840

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study examines, in a public employment-service context, the pathway from emotional labor to organizational cynicism via job burnout and investigates how resilience operates within this process through paradoxical moderation and moderated mediation. Survey data were collected from 608 employment service officers, and analyses using SPSS 29.0 and the PROCESS Macro revealed three main findings. First, emotional labor significantly increased both job burnout and organizational cynicism. Second, job burnout partially mediated the relationship between emotional labor and organizational cynicism, supporting the mechanism whereby sustained conformity to emotional display rules depletes affective resources and, in turn, fosters cynicism. Third, resilience functioned not as a buffer but as an amplifying moderator on the emotional labor → burnout link; consequently, the indirect effect of emotional labor on organizational cynicism via burnout was significantly stronger at higher levels of resilience, indicating a moderated mediation pattern.
      These results extend the boundary conditions of the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) and Conservation of Resources (COR) frameworks by demonstrating that, in high emotional-demand contexts, resilience—typically viewed as a positive psychological resource—can catalyze over-adaptation and over-commitment, thereby accelerating cumulative resource loss. Practically, the findings underscore the limitations of stress-management interventions focused solely on individual capacity building. Organizations should align rewards with emotional labor intensity, guarantee recovery time and job rotation, institute supervision and peer support, and embed structural resources such as psychological safety mechanisms and early warning systems for overload. In parallel, during digital transformation and the introduction of counseling-support technologies, work should be redesigned to redistribute counselors’ emotional burdens, and monitoring systems should be established for emerging emotion-demand patterns in hybrid human–AI interactions.
      번역하기

      This study examines, in a public employment-service context, the pathway from emotional labor to organizational cynicism via job burnout and investigates how resilience operates within this process through paradoxical moderation and moderated mediatio...

      This study examines, in a public employment-service context, the pathway from emotional labor to organizational cynicism via job burnout and investigates how resilience operates within this process through paradoxical moderation and moderated mediation. Survey data were collected from 608 employment service officers, and analyses using SPSS 29.0 and the PROCESS Macro revealed three main findings. First, emotional labor significantly increased both job burnout and organizational cynicism. Second, job burnout partially mediated the relationship between emotional labor and organizational cynicism, supporting the mechanism whereby sustained conformity to emotional display rules depletes affective resources and, in turn, fosters cynicism. Third, resilience functioned not as a buffer but as an amplifying moderator on the emotional labor → burnout link; consequently, the indirect effect of emotional labor on organizational cynicism via burnout was significantly stronger at higher levels of resilience, indicating a moderated mediation pattern.
      These results extend the boundary conditions of the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) and Conservation of Resources (COR) frameworks by demonstrating that, in high emotional-demand contexts, resilience—typically viewed as a positive psychological resource—can catalyze over-adaptation and over-commitment, thereby accelerating cumulative resource loss. Practically, the findings underscore the limitations of stress-management interventions focused solely on individual capacity building. Organizations should align rewards with emotional labor intensity, guarantee recovery time and job rotation, institute supervision and peer support, and embed structural resources such as psychological safety mechanisms and early warning systems for overload. In parallel, during digital transformation and the introduction of counseling-support technologies, work should be redesigned to redistribute counselors’ emotional burdens, and monitoring systems should be established for emerging emotion-demand patterns in hybrid human–AI interactions.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼