RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    靈光 水洞鏡으로 본 被葬者의 性格 = Socio-political Status of the Buried in a Pit Burial at Su-dong, Yeonggwang Based on the Two Imitative Bronze Mirrors

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76157299

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Korean archaeological circles has regarded a bronze mirror as a critical status symbol during the Bronze and Iron Ages in the Korean Peninsula. Bronze mirrors have been also considered as a standard of chronometric dating of the archaeological sites yielding them because the types of the bronze mirrors well reflect temporal shift. In particular, Chinese mirrors are one of the artifacts well reflecting international relationships among China, Korea, and Japan at that time. In the Korean Peninsula, mirrors imitating Chinese mirrors began to appear before and after the Christian era. While these mirrors imitating Chinese mirrors have been reported mostly in Gyeongsang provinces, a couple of bronze mirrors imitating Chinese mirrors were unearthed at Su-dong pit burial site in Yeonggwang along with a bronze implement with bird design. The discovery of the mirrors provided Korean archaeological circle a critical momentum in that they were bronze mirrors firstly reported in the Honam Region which provided an opportunity to study socio-political stratification or differentiation and international relationships at that time.
    While it was impossible to trace the original mirrors which two mirrors attempted to imitate, they were considered to be locally manufactured. Triple slender saw-tooth pattern design on the mirror “a” is considered to reflect knobbed mirror tradition of the former period. While the mirror “a” and mirror “b” represented characteristicsof the imitative bronze mirrors of the South and North Gyeongsang provinces, respectively. The fact that these two mirrors were furnished in a burial reflected furnishing tradition of the knobbed mirrors of the former period. Based on the bronze implements with bird design and two mirrors, the person buried in the pit burial might have a position related to ritual service rite. Along with the bronze implements with bird design, these two mirrors might be implements for the ritual service. While the person buried in the burial seemed to recognize the meaning of the Chinese mirror as a status symbol to symbolize authority, he did not have access to original Chinese mirrors. Instead, he manufactured and possessed imitative bronze mirrors for justifying his authority. While clear archaeological evidence to show direct trade or exchange with the Chinese Han Dynasty was not produced at the Su-dong site, these two bronze mirrors imitating Chinese mirrors are sound evidence that population at the Su-dong site already acknowledged the Chinese Han culture and there might be international trade or exchange with China, in particular, Nangnang commandery. Based on the typology of the bronze implements, the date of the site is belonging between the late 1st centure and the early 2nd century A.D..
    번역하기

    Korean archaeological circles has regarded a bronze mirror as a critical status symbol during the Bronze and Iron Ages in the Korean Peninsula. Bronze mirrors have been also considered as a standard of chronometric dating of the archaeological sites y...

    Korean archaeological circles has regarded a bronze mirror as a critical status symbol during the Bronze and Iron Ages in the Korean Peninsula. Bronze mirrors have been also considered as a standard of chronometric dating of the archaeological sites yielding them because the types of the bronze mirrors well reflect temporal shift. In particular, Chinese mirrors are one of the artifacts well reflecting international relationships among China, Korea, and Japan at that time. In the Korean Peninsula, mirrors imitating Chinese mirrors began to appear before and after the Christian era. While these mirrors imitating Chinese mirrors have been reported mostly in Gyeongsang provinces, a couple of bronze mirrors imitating Chinese mirrors were unearthed at Su-dong pit burial site in Yeonggwang along with a bronze implement with bird design. The discovery of the mirrors provided Korean archaeological circle a critical momentum in that they were bronze mirrors firstly reported in the Honam Region which provided an opportunity to study socio-political stratification or differentiation and international relationships at that time.
    While it was impossible to trace the original mirrors which two mirrors attempted to imitate, they were considered to be locally manufactured. Triple slender saw-tooth pattern design on the mirror “a” is considered to reflect knobbed mirror tradition of the former period. While the mirror “a” and mirror “b” represented characteristicsof the imitative bronze mirrors of the South and North Gyeongsang provinces, respectively. The fact that these two mirrors were furnished in a burial reflected furnishing tradition of the knobbed mirrors of the former period. Based on the bronze implements with bird design and two mirrors, the person buried in the pit burial might have a position related to ritual service rite. Along with the bronze implements with bird design, these two mirrors might be implements for the ritual service. While the person buried in the burial seemed to recognize the meaning of the Chinese mirror as a status symbol to symbolize authority, he did not have access to original Chinese mirrors. Instead, he manufactured and possessed imitative bronze mirrors for justifying his authority. While clear archaeological evidence to show direct trade or exchange with the Chinese Han Dynasty was not produced at the Su-dong site, these two bronze mirrors imitating Chinese mirrors are sound evidence that population at the Su-dong site already acknowledged the Chinese Han culture and there might be international trade or exchange with China, in particular, Nangnang commandery. Based on the typology of the bronze implements, the date of the site is belonging between the late 1st centure and the early 2nd century A.D..

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 머리말
    • 2. 遺構와 出土遺物
    • 3. 水洞鏡의 檢討와 被葬者의 性格
    • 4. 맺음말
    • 參考文獻
    • 1. 머리말
    • 2. 遺構와 出土遺物
    • 3. 水洞鏡의 檢討와 被葬者의 性格
    • 4. 맺음말
    • 參考文獻
    • (Abstract)
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼