RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    아이러니의 이해 = The schema-based Understanding of Irony

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19570242

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Schema is defined to be a socially or personally sterotyped sequence of actions or thoughts which consists of scripts, plans, goals and themes, and it is thus a composite bundle of scripts, plans, goals, themes, agents, actions, and results. Irony results when independent schemas are opposite to one another with consistency and parallelism, based on an appropriate judgemental criterion. The degree of the opposition determines the effective power of irony and easiness in understanding. In addition, the understanding of irony depends on(1) the objectiveness and detachment on the part of ironists/observers, and(2) the unawareness of reality on the part of ironical victims, which also take effects on the ironical power and easiness in understanding.
    For the expository purpose, the verbal irony is divided into two kinds of statements. The utterer provides the ironical situation with the ironical statement 1, and he who utters the ironical statement 2 (1) refers to the ironical situation, (2) interprets and evaluates it, and(3) sends his information(4) with detachments and attitudes(scorns, ridicules and what the like). The utterer can thus present the ironical statement 2, only after he recognizes and refers to be ironical situation ; on the other hand, by providing the ironical statement 1 to create the situation, sometimes fully aware of it or sometimes totally unaware of it, the utterer commits its interpretation/evaluation to the hearer. From this point of view, there is no difference between them in the interpretative processes of the assumed ironical situation satisfying the schema-opposition and other properties, except the above mentioned difference. Thus, the emphasis should be put on the analysis of ironcial situations before verbal ironies, so that irony can be considered within a larger framework. And the analysis of ironical situation can serve to explain the pragmatic uses of irony with generality.
    번역하기

    Schema is defined to be a socially or personally sterotyped sequence of actions or thoughts which consists of scripts, plans, goals and themes, and it is thus a composite bundle of scripts, plans, goals, themes, agents, actions, and results. Irony res...

    Schema is defined to be a socially or personally sterotyped sequence of actions or thoughts which consists of scripts, plans, goals and themes, and it is thus a composite bundle of scripts, plans, goals, themes, agents, actions, and results. Irony results when independent schemas are opposite to one another with consistency and parallelism, based on an appropriate judgemental criterion. The degree of the opposition determines the effective power of irony and easiness in understanding. In addition, the understanding of irony depends on(1) the objectiveness and detachment on the part of ironists/observers, and(2) the unawareness of reality on the part of ironical victims, which also take effects on the ironical power and easiness in understanding.
    For the expository purpose, the verbal irony is divided into two kinds of statements. The utterer provides the ironical situation with the ironical statement 1, and he who utters the ironical statement 2 (1) refers to the ironical situation, (2) interprets and evaluates it, and(3) sends his information(4) with detachments and attitudes(scorns, ridicules and what the like). The utterer can thus present the ironical statement 2, only after he recognizes and refers to be ironical situation ; on the other hand, by providing the ironical statement 1 to create the situation, sometimes fully aware of it or sometimes totally unaware of it, the utterer commits its interpretation/evaluation to the hearer. From this point of view, there is no difference between them in the interpretative processes of the assumed ironical situation satisfying the schema-opposition and other properties, except the above mentioned difference. Thus, the emphasis should be put on the analysis of ironcial situations before verbal ironies, so that irony can be considered within a larger framework. And the analysis of ironical situation can serve to explain the pragmatic uses of irony with generality.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
    • Ⅲ. 아이러니칼한 상황
    • Ⅳ. 스키마 대립 요소와 아이러니 이해
    • Ⅴ. 아이러니칼한 진술
    • Ⅰ. 서 론
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
    • Ⅲ. 아이러니칼한 상황
    • Ⅳ. 스키마 대립 요소와 아이러니 이해
    • Ⅴ. 아이러니칼한 진술
    • Ⅵ. 아이러니의 화용적 사용
    • Ⅶ. 결 론
    • 참고문헌
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼