한국과 일본의 지적제도에 관한 비교 연구 = A Comparative Study on Cadastre System of Korea and Japan

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to research and analyze the current status of the cadastre systems of Korea and Japan, compare them and show the commonalities and differences.
Subject was limited to the cadastre systems of Korea and Japan and the time scope of the study was set from 1873 to now, 2015, whereas the spatial scope was limited to the cadastre systems of Korea and Japan and the contents were limited to the research and analysis of the current status of the cadastre systems of Korea and Japan to compare them and show the commonalities and differences.
Administrative approach was adopted as the research approach; literature research and Internet research as research method; and comparative analysis and descriptive analysis as analysis method of research contents.
Results showed that the commonalities of the cadastre system law of Korea and Japan were first, the purpose is to protect the property rights of the people of the nation, second, principle of cadastral government administration, formalism, principle of public, material principle of justice, principle of registration of authority are adopted as the cadastre format. Third, in the cadastral legal aspect, positive law, statute law, domestic law, indigenous law, adjective law, general law, forceful law, and public law are adopted. Fourth, it is used as decision making data necessary for various land related activities such as land transaction, land evaluation, land taxation, land development, land utilization plan, etc; fifth, registration information is consisted of land location, lot number, land category, area, owner, floor plan number. Sixth, the purpose of redoing the cadastre research project is to enhance the precision of registration of cadastral record that does not coordinate with the actualities. On the other hand, the legal differences of cadastre systems of Korea and Japan are first, in Korea it is used for cadastre works whereas in Japan it is used for both cadastre and registration works. Second, as for the registration information, Korea registers land price on the cadastral record whereas in Japan the building is registered. Third, rework on cadastral research is carried out in Korea through an official agency institution - Korea Land and Geospatial InformatiX Corporation - but in Japan it is carried out through a proxy, a general measurement enterprise.
Commonalities of cadastral administrative organization lies in the fact that both Korea and Japan are in charge; the central branch of each nation, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and Ministry of Justice are in charge of cadastral administration.
Difference in cadastral administration organization and cadastral record management lies in the fact that in Korea regional autonomous organization is in charge whereas in Japan a national organization such as the Ministry of Justice or regional Ministry of Justice or its branches are in charge.
As for the cadastral work proxy organizations, both countries use one but rework on the cadastral research is carried out by a cadastral proxy organization under a special law on rework of cadastral research in Korea whereas in Japan a general measurement enterprise is responsible for the work, under the territory investigation law.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 1
• 1. 연구의 목적 1
• 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 2
• 1) 연구의 범위 2
• 2) 연구의 방법 3
• 3. 선행 연구의 검토 및 차별성 6
• 1) 선행 연구의 검토 6
• (1) 한국의 선행 연구 6
• (2) 일본의 선행 연구 7
• 2) 선행 연구와의 차별성 8
• Ⅱ. 지적제도의 이론적 고찰 9
• 1. 지적제도의 개념 9
• 2. 지적제도의 구성요소 10
• 1) 지적제도의 주체인 국가 10
• 2) 지적제도의 객체로서의 국토 11
• 3) 지적법령 11
• 4) 지적행정 11
• 3. 지적제도의 유형 12
• 4. 지적제도의 기능 13
• 5. 지적제도의 필요성 14
• Ⅲ. 한국과 일본의 지적제도에 대한 실태 분석 15
• 1. 한국의 지적제도 실태 분석 15
• 1) 지적제도에 관한 법률 15
• (1) 공간정보의 구축 및 관리 등에 관한 법률 15
• (2) 지적재조사에 관한 특별법 19
• (3) 지적법령의 변천 연혁 21
• 2) 지적행정조직 23
• (1) 국토교통부 23
• (2) 지방자치단체(시ㆍ도 및 시ㆍ군ㆍ구) 25
• 3) 지적 업무 대행기관 27
• (1) 한국국토정보공사 27
• (2) 지적측량업자 28
• 2. 일본의 지적제도 실태 분석 28
• 1) 지적제도에 관한 법률 28
• (1) 부동산등기법 28
• (2) 국토조사법 33
• (3) 지적법령의 변천 연혁 37
• 2) 지적행정조직 38
• (1) 법무성 38
• (2) 국토교통성 39
• (3) 지방자치단체 41
• 3) 지적 업무 대행기관 42
• (1) 토지가옥조사사 42
• (2) 측량업자 45
• 3. 한국과 일본의 지적제도 비교 분석 46
• Ⅳ. 한국과 일본의 지적제도에 대한 공통점과 차이점 48
• 1. 공통점 48
• 1) 지적제도에 관한 법률 48
• (1) 제정의 목적 48
• (2) 형식 49
• (3) 성격 49
• (4) 필요 50
• (5) 등록정보 50
• (6) 지적재조사사업 50
• 2) 지적행정조직 51
• 3) 지적 업무 대행기관 52
• 2. 차이점 53
• 1) 지적제도에 관한 법률 53
• (1) 목적 53
• (2) 형식, 성격, 필요성 53
• (3) 등록정보 54
• (4) 지적재조사사업 54
• 2) 지적행정조직 55
• 3) 지적 업무 대행기관 56
• Ⅴ. 결론 57
• 1. 요약 및 결론 57
• 2. 연구의 한계 및 제언 59