이돈화의 우주관과 인간관이 지니는 동서철학 융합적 특징 및 생명철학적 의의-『신인철학』을 중심으로- = Characteristics of integrated eastern and western Philosophies and Meanings in Terms of Philosophy of Life of Lee Don-hwa (李敦化)`s Views of the Universe and Human Beings-Focusing on New Human Philosophy (新人哲學)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study has as an objective to narrate the key contents of Lee Don-hwa`s (李敦化, 1884-unkown) views of the universe and human beings, to investigate the characteristics of integrated Eastern and Western philosophies, and to define their meanings in terms of philosophy of life, focusing on New Human Philosophy (新人哲學). In his discussion on the universe, Lee Don-hwa inherited the speculative tradition of Donghak (東學) in which Hanul was inherent and at the same time transcendental. Namely, he believed that Heaven itself was an existence surpassing time and space, but within that time and space, it moved dynamically. This view was based on the 19th-century Donghak at the nearest, but in a broader sense it inherited the speculative tradition of the Orient. Lee Don-hwa based his views on philosophy of life of the Orient, but at the same time selectively embraced Henri Bergson`s philosophy of life as well as Japans` Realism, Spinoza`s concept of natura naturans, the evolution theory, etc. to make the content abundant. On the other hand, in his discussion on human beings, Lee Don-hwa proposed a new concept, Ingangyeok (man`s personality, 人間格) by highlighting the meaning man can have as an universal existence. Ingangyeok is defined as an ideal personality of human beings as a universal existence, and through this concept, man evolves infinitely as the pivotal existence of the universe while stressing man is organically connected with other natural existences. The concept of Ingangyeok is basically based on Donghak`s doctrine of Innaecheon (humans are Heaven, 人乃天) and Confucian views on human beings, but Lee substantiated the content by absorbing several key ideologies from the evolution theory of the modern West and Bergson`s philosophy of life. The tendency of integrated Eastern and Western philosophies which Lee Don-hwa showed in his views on the universe and human beings is meaningful in that he adhered to balanced attitude in terms of critical inheritance or acceptance. Also, unlike the 19th-century Donghak, his philosophy actively absorbed achievements of Western learning on life and is significant in that he substantiated the ideology of Innaecheon. Only it is somewhat regrettable that it made an emphasis on the natural immanence of life and maintained weak respect for nature.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 王弼, "老子道德經注校釋" 中華書局 2008

2 陳鼓應, "老子註譯及評介" 中華書局 1984

3 천도교중앙총부, "천도교경전" 천도교중앙총부출판부 1993

4 앙리 베르그손, "창조적 진화" 아카넷 2005

5 황문수, "이돈화의 신인(新人)사상" 동학학회 (1) : 2000

6 임형진, "이돈화의 동학사상과 정치이념" 동학학회 (22) : 45-82, 2011

7 허수, "이돈화 연구 - 종교와 사회의 경계" 역사비평사 2011

8 김세정, "유가생태수양론을 통해 본 유가생태철학의 미래" 한국환경철학회 2015

9 B. 스피노자, "에티카" 서광사 2007

10 이돈화, "신인철학" 한국사상연구회 1963

11 로저 스크러턴, "스피노자" 시공사 2000

12 이준모, "생태철학" 문사철 2012

13 김영효, "베르그송의 철학" 민음사 1991

14 양선진, "베르그손의 생명론과 환경문제" 생명문화연구소 40 : 49-87, 2016

15 이돈화, "동학지인생관" 천도교중앙총부 1974

16 황종원, "동학 신 관념의 세 가지 사상적 연원 - 무속·천주학·유학과의 관계를 중심으로 -" 유학연구소 32 : 193-226, 2015

17 王先謙, "荀子集解" 中華書局 1988

18 王陽明, "王陽明全集" 線裝書局 2012

19 張載, "張載集" 中華書局 1978

20 장원석, "夜雷 이돈화의 유신론과 진화론의 융합체로서 전도교 해석" 한국종교학회 (38) : 133-154, 2005

21 井上哲次郞, "哲學と宗敎" 弘道館 1915

22 二程, "二程集" 中華書局 1981

23 石峻, "中國佛敎思想資料選編" 中華書局 1983

24 牟宗三, "『心體與性體』 第1冊" 正中書局 1996

25 고건호, "‘종교-되기’와 ‘종교-넘어서기’: 이돈화의 신종교론" 한국종교문화연구소 (7) : 2005

26 황종원, "20세기 초엽 천도교의 인내천 교의 및 심성론에 대한 비판적 연구" 대동철학회 (44) : 91-116, 2008