RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      6자회담의 진로와 향후 과제 = The Six-Party Talks and the DPRK Nuclear Problems - Prospects and Strategy -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105476038

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Could the recent "food for freeze" agreement between the U.S. and the DPRK make a breakthrough for the resumption of the deadlocked Six-Party Talks and in the DPRK denuclearization, respectively? The answer is that "may be" for the talks, but "no" in the denuclearization.
      This agreement has a bunch of pitfalls that the DPRK can run off with the carrots--we have seen the same scene again and again in the past negotiations.
      - A moratorium, the DPRK said, will be implemented “while productive dialogues continue.” That means the DPRK can break the negotiations down whenever at their will.
      - It is unclear that how much unrestricted access the IAEA inspectors will have to all facilities at Yongbyon. Moreover, it should be noted that the UEP inspection is more urgent and important at the areas other than Yongbyon.
      - The DPRK, in its unilateral statement, argued that once the talks resumed the issues such as sanctions on the DPRK and provisions of LWRs will be discussed prior to all other issues. The ROK, however, is negative on the LWRs.
      - Most importantly, the DPRK will never give up the nukes. They are the DPRK"s ‘last resort’ and the ‘magic box’ for negotiations. The DPRK is now a "de facto" nuclear state, and we have already lost the momentum to solve the problem peacefully.
      In retrospect, the Six-Party Talks has been ‘nothing but the very expensive dinner party.’ It might be useful, at best, in putting off the progress of the DPRK"s nuclear programs. But it has failed: not only integrating the DPRK into the international community and its rules, but also denuclearizing the DPRK.
      Now, it seems that the complete and the ultimate solution is a ‘nation building’ process for the DPRK or a unification of the peninsula under the ROK rules. The strategy should be two-folded: the open strategy--continue the Six-Party Talks, engagement, etc. in order not to hard-landing the DPRK; the hidden strategy--accelerate the DPRK"s "nation building" and the reunification of Korea under the system of the liberal democracy and the market economy.
      번역하기

      Could the recent "food for freeze" agreement between the U.S. and the DPRK make a breakthrough for the resumption of the deadlocked Six-Party Talks and in the DPRK denuclearization, respectively? The answer is that "may be" for the talks, but "no" in ...

      Could the recent "food for freeze" agreement between the U.S. and the DPRK make a breakthrough for the resumption of the deadlocked Six-Party Talks and in the DPRK denuclearization, respectively? The answer is that "may be" for the talks, but "no" in the denuclearization.
      This agreement has a bunch of pitfalls that the DPRK can run off with the carrots--we have seen the same scene again and again in the past negotiations.
      - A moratorium, the DPRK said, will be implemented “while productive dialogues continue.” That means the DPRK can break the negotiations down whenever at their will.
      - It is unclear that how much unrestricted access the IAEA inspectors will have to all facilities at Yongbyon. Moreover, it should be noted that the UEP inspection is more urgent and important at the areas other than Yongbyon.
      - The DPRK, in its unilateral statement, argued that once the talks resumed the issues such as sanctions on the DPRK and provisions of LWRs will be discussed prior to all other issues. The ROK, however, is negative on the LWRs.
      - Most importantly, the DPRK will never give up the nukes. They are the DPRK"s ‘last resort’ and the ‘magic box’ for negotiations. The DPRK is now a "de facto" nuclear state, and we have already lost the momentum to solve the problem peacefully.
      In retrospect, the Six-Party Talks has been ‘nothing but the very expensive dinner party.’ It might be useful, at best, in putting off the progress of the DPRK"s nuclear programs. But it has failed: not only integrating the DPRK into the international community and its rules, but also denuclearizing the DPRK.
      Now, it seems that the complete and the ultimate solution is a ‘nation building’ process for the DPRK or a unification of the peninsula under the ROK rules. The strategy should be two-folded: the open strategy--continue the Six-Party Talks, engagement, etc. in order not to hard-landing the DPRK; the hidden strategy--accelerate the DPRK"s "nation building" and the reunification of Korea under the system of the liberal democracy and the market economy.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 6자회담의 주요 경과와 전망
      • Ⅲ. 6자회담 재개 시 주요 쟁점
      • Ⅳ. 북한 핵문제에 담겨 있는 난점들
      • V. 결론: 향후 과제와 우리의 전략
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 6자회담의 주요 경과와 전망
      • Ⅲ. 6자회담 재개 시 주요 쟁점
      • Ⅳ. 북한 핵문제에 담겨 있는 난점들
      • V. 결론: 향후 과제와 우리의 전략
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼