RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      기술(技術)의 본질과 오인(誤認)의 원천들 = The nature of technology and grounds of misconception

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A5046476

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Even with the plethora of books concerning the human impact of technology, few are concerned with the nature of technology per se. These are not a technology and philosophy but the philosophy of technology. Wider society is still inclined to consider technology as ``applied science``. Then this forgotten technology is a affect arisen from modern technics which background or near-technological environment itself. These technology are a present absence. Don Ihde`s study breaks down the human-technology relation into three categories: the embodiment relation, the hermeneutic relation, the background relation. To analysing these three relations reveled the nature and structure of technology per se. The nature of technological structure immanent in three pattern is ``the essential magnification-reduction structure`` and the nature of techno-logy itself is ``the instrumental intentionality``. The utopia/dystopia dichotomy and romanticization for technology is a affect of the essential magnification-reduction structure immanent in the human-technology relation. The antagonism between instrumental and substantive theory on the nature of technology is a affect which is based on a misunderstanding the instrumental intentionality. By explaining grounds of misconception on technology, this assay propose that debates revolving around technological development may take the shape of an argument between those who take a social-determinist position and techno-logical-determinist position is rooted in a misconception on technology, and the philosophy of technology ought to start from the theory of social-determinism grounded ``instrumental intentionality``.
      번역하기

      Even with the plethora of books concerning the human impact of technology, few are concerned with the nature of technology per se. These are not a technology and philosophy but the philosophy of technology. Wider society is still inclined to consider ...

      Even with the plethora of books concerning the human impact of technology, few are concerned with the nature of technology per se. These are not a technology and philosophy but the philosophy of technology. Wider society is still inclined to consider technology as ``applied science``. Then this forgotten technology is a affect arisen from modern technics which background or near-technological environment itself. These technology are a present absence. Don Ihde`s study breaks down the human-technology relation into three categories: the embodiment relation, the hermeneutic relation, the background relation. To analysing these three relations reveled the nature and structure of technology per se. The nature of technological structure immanent in three pattern is ``the essential magnification-reduction structure`` and the nature of techno-logy itself is ``the instrumental intentionality``. The utopia/dystopia dichotomy and romanticization for technology is a affect of the essential magnification-reduction structure immanent in the human-technology relation. The antagonism between instrumental and substantive theory on the nature of technology is a affect which is based on a misunderstanding the instrumental intentionality. By explaining grounds of misconception on technology, this assay propose that debates revolving around technological development may take the shape of an argument between those who take a social-determinist position and techno-logical-determinist position is rooted in a misconception on technology, and the philosophy of technology ought to start from the theory of social-determinism grounded ``instrumental intentionality``.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Bunge, "Toward a Philosophy of Technology(Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Problems of Technology)" New York:Free Press 1972

      2 Jarvie, "The Social Character of Technological Problems: Comments on Skolimowski’s paper(Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Problems of Technology)" New York: Free Press 1972

      3 C. Mitcham, "Technology and the Structure of Knowledge(Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Problems of Technology)" New York:Free Press 1972

      4 "Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth" Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press 1990

      5 Ellul, Jacques, "Technique(The Technological Society)" New York: Knopf 1964

      6 Ihde, Don, "Technics and Praxis" Holland / Boston: D. Reidel 1979

      7 "Philosophy of Technology: introduction" New York: Paragon House 1993

      8 "Instrumental Realism: The Interface between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology" Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press 1991

      9 "Existential Technics" New York: State University New York Press 1983

      10 Feenberg, Andrew, "Critical Theory of Technology" London: Oxford University Press 1991

      1 Bunge, "Toward a Philosophy of Technology(Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Problems of Technology)" New York:Free Press 1972

      2 Jarvie, "The Social Character of Technological Problems: Comments on Skolimowski’s paper(Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Problems of Technology)" New York: Free Press 1972

      3 C. Mitcham, "Technology and the Structure of Knowledge(Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Problems of Technology)" New York:Free Press 1972

      4 "Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth" Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press 1990

      5 Ellul, Jacques, "Technique(The Technological Society)" New York: Knopf 1964

      6 Ihde, Don, "Technics and Praxis" Holland / Boston: D. Reidel 1979

      7 "Philosophy of Technology: introduction" New York: Paragon House 1993

      8 "Instrumental Realism: The Interface between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology" Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press 1991

      9 "Existential Technics" New York: State University New York Press 1983

      10 Feenberg, Andrew, "Critical Theory of Technology" London: Oxford University Press 1991

      11 "Consequences of Phenomenology" New York: State University of New York 1986

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-10-05 학술지명변경 외국어명 : A semiannually Journal of Philosophical Thought in Korea -> EPOCH AND PHILOSOPHY -A Journal of Philosophical Thought in Korea- KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.61 0.61 0.62
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.66 0.62 1.3 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼