RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    국제환경법에 있어서 ‘제3세계 국제법시각’ = TWAIl in International Environmental Laws

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101248297

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Third World Approach in International Law(TWAIL) spotlighted in 1990’s pointed the problems of not only tht the international law has to handle but also that the third world itself has. This short paper explores the TWAIL in international environmental law areas focusing on its environmental paradigm and viewpoint on the basic legal principles and suggests reciprocal complementation between the third world countries’ environmental value and the first and second world countries’ legal norms. In order to solve the environmental problems in international community, it should be reconsidered of environmental ethics we have. In this point, environmental paradigm of the East, which consider nature not as objects of ownership to have but as subject to live together and not as natural resources under the individual state’s jurisdiction but as common heritage of human kinds which is very close to, is helpful for reconstruction or understanding the international environmental legal principles. The principle of sustainable development focusing on not only intergenerational equity but also introgenerational equity, the principle of common but differentiated responsibility focusing on cutural heritage of the East, and finally common heritage of mankind focusing on the public trust doctrine are good examples. However, it is also necessary to solve the problems that the third world countries has revealed such as corruption, environmental injustice in their countries through the value of the first world countries, democracy. Therefore, the two sides can have win-win situation through making up for the each one’s faults in international environmental protection.
    번역하기

    The Third World Approach in International Law(TWAIL) spotlighted in 1990’s pointed the problems of not only tht the international law has to handle but also that the third world itself has. This short paper explores the TWAIL in international enviro...

    The Third World Approach in International Law(TWAIL) spotlighted in 1990’s pointed the problems of not only tht the international law has to handle but also that the third world itself has. This short paper explores the TWAIL in international environmental law areas focusing on its environmental paradigm and viewpoint on the basic legal principles and suggests reciprocal complementation between the third world countries’ environmental value and the first and second world countries’ legal norms. In order to solve the environmental problems in international community, it should be reconsidered of environmental ethics we have. In this point, environmental paradigm of the East, which consider nature not as objects of ownership to have but as subject to live together and not as natural resources under the individual state’s jurisdiction but as common heritage of human kinds which is very close to, is helpful for reconstruction or understanding the international environmental legal principles. The principle of sustainable development focusing on not only intergenerational equity but also introgenerational equity, the principle of common but differentiated responsibility focusing on cutural heritage of the East, and finally common heritage of mankind focusing on the public trust doctrine are good examples. However, it is also necessary to solve the problems that the third world countries has revealed such as corruption, environmental injustice in their countries through the value of the first world countries, democracy. Therefore, the two sides can have win-win situation through making up for the each one’s faults in international environmental protection.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론
    • Ⅱ. 제3세계 및 제3세계 국제법시각의 개념
    • Ⅲ. 환경패러다임
    • Ⅳ. 국제법원칙에 대한 입장
    • Ⅴ. 결 론
    • Ⅰ. 서 론
    • Ⅱ. 제3세계 및 제3세계 국제법시각의 개념
    • Ⅲ. 환경패러다임
    • Ⅳ. 국제법원칙에 대한 입장
    • Ⅴ. 결 론
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 조홍식, "환경법 소묘:환경법의 원리,실제,방법론에 관한 실험적 고찰" 서울대학교 111 : 318-357, 1999

    2 소병천, "환경권에 대한 새로운 패러다임" 13 : 363-, 2002

    3 "창세기 1:24-31"

    4 "생물다양성협약 제12조,제17조"

    5 소병천, "기후변화 대응 국제논의의 쟁점 및 국제법적 함의" 서울국제법연구원 16 (16): 1-27, 2009

    6 서원상, "국제환경법 상 차별적 공동책임" 성균관대학교 대학원 2006

    7 이재곤, "국제환경법" 박영사 2015

    8 金榮球, "深海底 開發制度의 法的問題에 관한 硏究" 한양대학교 대학원 1984

    9 Kemal Baslar, "The concept of the common heritage of mankind in international law" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 21-22, 1998

    10 CISDL, "The Principle of Commonbut Different Responsibilities: Origins and Scope"

    1 조홍식, "환경법 소묘:환경법의 원리,실제,방법론에 관한 실험적 고찰" 서울대학교 111 : 318-357, 1999

    2 소병천, "환경권에 대한 새로운 패러다임" 13 : 363-, 2002

    3 "창세기 1:24-31"

    4 "생물다양성협약 제12조,제17조"

    5 소병천, "기후변화 대응 국제논의의 쟁점 및 국제법적 함의" 서울국제법연구원 16 (16): 1-27, 2009

    6 서원상, "국제환경법 상 차별적 공동책임" 성균관대학교 대학원 2006

    7 이재곤, "국제환경법" 박영사 2015

    8 金榮球, "深海底 開發制度의 法的問題에 관한 硏究" 한양대학교 대학원 1984

    9 Kemal Baslar, "The concept of the common heritage of mankind in international law" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 21-22, 1998

    10 CISDL, "The Principle of Commonbut Different Responsibilities: Origins and Scope"

    11 Mark T. Berger, "The End of the“ Third World?”" 15 : 257-, 1994

    12 Nigel Harris, "The End of the Third World" New Amsterdam Books 1990

    13 Usha Natarajan, "TWAIL and the Environment:The State of Nature, the Nature of the State,and the Arab Spring" 14 : 177-181, 2012

    14 P. Sands, "Principles of International Environmental Law,Vol.1" Manchester University Press 63-, 1995

    15 Nicholas B., "Dirks Castes of Mind:Colonialism and the Making of Modern India" Princeton University Press 9-, 2001

    16 "Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relation and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations" 2625 (2625): 1970

    17 Mark T. Berger, "After the Third World? History, Destiny and the Fate of Third Worldism" 25 : 9-, 2004

    18 N.S. Rembe, "Africa and the International Law of the Sea" ijthoff and Noordhoff 52-, 1980

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.33 0.33 0.29
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.31 0.31 0.641 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼