RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      How Modular-to-Integral Product Architecture Changes Affected an Industry’s Structure and Competition

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104958134

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Much of the research dealing with the relationships between product architecture and industry structure change suggests one evolutionary direction - as products tend to change from integral to modular form, industry tends to change from integrated to disintegrated form. Given much research focuses on the predominant evolutionary direction, of particular interest to this study is the processes by which modular-to-integral product architecture change shapes industry’s competitive structure. We empirically test Schilling’s theoretical model of interfirm product modularity with an unusual case of de-modularization of a dominant design in a mature industry. We find that the model fully explains the direction of the process, but only partially its beginning and final outcome. Through careful study of the case we identify conditions favorable for the start of the process, and specify detailed mechanisms through which the de-modularization resulted in a nearmonopoly position of the attacking firm. The results suggest that the product architecture simultaneously represents a firm’s decision variable and shapes the firm’s competitive environment, and the relative weight between them is determined by contextual circumstances.
      번역하기

      Much of the research dealing with the relationships between product architecture and industry structure change suggests one evolutionary direction - as products tend to change from integral to modular form, industry tends to change from integrated to ...

      Much of the research dealing with the relationships between product architecture and industry structure change suggests one evolutionary direction - as products tend to change from integral to modular form, industry tends to change from integrated to disintegrated form. Given much research focuses on the predominant evolutionary direction, of particular interest to this study is the processes by which modular-to-integral product architecture change shapes industry’s competitive structure. We empirically test Schilling’s theoretical model of interfirm product modularity with an unusual case of de-modularization of a dominant design in a mature industry. We find that the model fully explains the direction of the process, but only partially its beginning and final outcome. Through careful study of the case we identify conditions favorable for the start of the process, and specify detailed mechanisms through which the de-modularization resulted in a nearmonopoly position of the attacking firm. The results suggest that the product architecture simultaneously represents a firm’s decision variable and shapes the firm’s competitive environment, and the relative weight between them is determined by contextual circumstances.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Macher, J. T., "Vertical Specialization and Industry Structure in High Technology Industries. In Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 21 - Business Strategy over the Industry Life Cycle" Elsevier 317-355, 2004

      2 Dalziel,M, "Understanding Sectors as Systems" 2005

      3 Schilling,M.A, "Towards a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity" 25 (25): 312-334, 2000

      4 Ulrich,K.T, "The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm" 24 : 419-440, 1995

      5 Clark,K.B, "The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution" 14 : 235-251, 1985

      6 Gavetti, G., "The Strategy Field from the Perspective of Management Science: Divergent Strands and Possible Integration" 50 (50): 1309-1318, 2004

      7 Ferrier, W. J., "The Role of Competitive Action in Market Share Erosion and Industry Enthronement: A Study of Industry Leaders and Challengers" 42 (42): 372-388, 1999

      8 Meyer, M. H., "The Power of Product Platforms" The Free Press 1997

      9 Fixson,S.K, "The Multiple Faces of Modularity - A Literature Analysis of a Product Concept for assembled Hardware Products: 87" Industrial & Operations Engineering, University of Michigan 2003

      10 Christensen,C.M, "The Innovator's Dilemma - When New Technologies cause Great Firms to Fail" Harvard Business School Press 1997

      1 Macher, J. T., "Vertical Specialization and Industry Structure in High Technology Industries. In Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 21 - Business Strategy over the Industry Life Cycle" Elsevier 317-355, 2004

      2 Dalziel,M, "Understanding Sectors as Systems" 2005

      3 Schilling,M.A, "Towards a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity" 25 (25): 312-334, 2000

      4 Ulrich,K.T, "The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm" 24 : 419-440, 1995

      5 Clark,K.B, "The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution" 14 : 235-251, 1985

      6 Gavetti, G., "The Strategy Field from the Perspective of Management Science: Divergent Strands and Possible Integration" 50 (50): 1309-1318, 2004

      7 Ferrier, W. J., "The Role of Competitive Action in Market Share Erosion and Industry Enthronement: A Study of Industry Leaders and Challengers" 42 (42): 372-388, 1999

      8 Meyer, M. H., "The Power of Product Platforms" The Free Press 1997

      9 Fixson,S.K, "The Multiple Faces of Modularity - A Literature Analysis of a Product Concept for assembled Hardware Products: 87" Industrial & Operations Engineering, University of Michigan 2003

      10 Christensen,C.M, "The Innovator's Dilemma - When New Technologies cause Great Firms to Fail" Harvard Business School Press 1997

      11 Economides,N, "The Economics of networks" 14 : 673-699, 1996

      12 Berto,F, "The Dancing Chain: History and Development of the Derailleur Bicycle (second ed.)" Van der Plas Publishing 2005

      13 Carlile, P. R., "The Cycles of Theory Building in Management Research" Boston University - School of Management 2005

      14 Jacobides, M. G., "The Co- Evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production" 26 : 395-413, 2005

      15 Katz, M. L., "Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities" 94 (94): 822-841, 1986

      16 Rosenbloom, R. S., "Technological Pioneering and Competitive Advantage: The Birth of the VCR Industry" XXIX (XXIX): 51-76, 1987

      17 Berto,F, "Sunset for SunTour" 1998

      18 Rosa, J. A., "Sociocognitive Dynamics in a Product Market" 63 (63): 64-77, 1999

      19 Fujita, K., "Product Variety Optimization Simultaneously Designing Module Combination and Module Attributes" 12 (12): 105-118, 2004

      20 Fixson,S.K, "Product Architecture Assessment: A Tool to link Product, Process, and Supply Chain Design Decisions" 23 (23): 345-369, 2005

      21 Abernathy, W. J., "Patterns of Industrial Innovation. Technology Review" MIT 59-64, 1978

      22 Poole, M. S., "Organizational Change and Innovation Processes - Theory and Methods for Research" Oxford University Press 2000

      23 Nelson, S. A. I., "Multicriteria Optimization in Product Platform Design" 123 (123): 199-204, 2001

      24 Fixson, S. K., "Modularization and Outsourcing: Who drives whom? - A Study of Generational Sequences in the U.S. Automotive Cockpit Industry" 5 (5): 166-183, 2005

      25 Worren, N., "Modularity, Strategic Flexibility, and Firm Performance: A Study of the Home Appliance Industry" 23 : 1123-1140, 2002

      26 Sanchez, R., "Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product and Organization Design" 17 (17): 63-76, 1996

      27 Schilling,M.A, "Modularity in Multiple Disciplines - Commentary on Toward a General Modular Systems Theory. In Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations" Blackwell Publishers 203-214, 2003

      28 Ethiraj, S. K., "Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems" 50 (50): 159-173, 2004

      29 Sturgeon,T, "Modular Production Networks: A New American Model of Industrial Organization" 11 (11): 451-496, 2002

      30 Tu, Q., "Measuring Modularity-Based Manufacturing Practices and Their Impact on Mass Customization Capability: A Customer-Driven Perspective" 35 (35): 147-168, 2004

      31 Utterback,J.M, "Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation" Harvard Business School Press 1994

      32 Pine,B.J.I, "Mass Customization" Harvard Business School Press 1993

      33 Garud, R., "Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations" Blackwell 2002

      34 Ramdas,K, "Managing Product Variety: An Integrative Review and Research Directions" 12 (12): 79-101, 2003

      35 Mikkola, J. H., "Managing Modularity of Product Architectures: Toward an Integrated Theory" 50 (50): 204-218, 2003

      36 Pettigrew,A.M, "Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice" 1 (1): 267-292, 1990

      37 Brusoni, S., "Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make" 46 (46): 597-621, 2001

      38 Jacobides,M.G, "Industry Change through Vertical Disintegration: How and Why Markets Emerged in Mortgage Banking" 48 (48): 465-498, 2005

      39 Abernathy, W. J., "Industrial Renaissance - Producing a Competitive Future for America" Basic Books 1983

      40 Rivkin,J.W, "Imitation of Complex Strategies" 46 (46): 824-844, 2000

      41 Holland,J.H, "Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity" Addison Wesley 1995

      42 MacCormack, A., "Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code, Harvard Business School Working Paper" 2004

      43 Shibata, T., "Empirical analysis of evolution of product architecture - Fanuc numerical controllers from 1962 to 1997" 34 : 13-31, 1997

      44 Hoetker,G, "Do Modular Products Lead to Modular Organizations" 27 : 501-518, 2006

      45 Christensen, C. M., "Disruption, Disintegration and The Dissipation of Differentiability" 11 (11): 955-993, 2002

      46 Baldwin, C. Y., "Design Rules. Volume 1: The Power of Modularity" MIT Press 2000

      47 Baldwin, C. Y., "Design Rules, The Power of Modularity" MIT Press 2000

      48 Fine, C. H, "Clockspeed - Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage" Perseus Books 1998

      49 Fine, C. H, "Clock Speed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage" Perseus Books Group 1998

      50 David,P.A, "Clio and the Economics of QWERTY" 75 (75): 332-337, 1985

      51 Eisenhardt,K.M, "Building Theories from Case Study Research" 14 (14): 532-550, 1989

      52 Wilson,D.G, "Bicycling Science (3rd ed.)" MIT Press 2004

      53 Simpson, T. W., "Assessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality Within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm" 12 (12): 119-129, 2004

      54 Henderson, R. M., "Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms" 35 : 9-30, 1990

      55 Duray, R., "Approaches to mass customization: configurations and empirical validation" 18 : 605-625, 2000

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼