조약의 체결,비준에 대한 국회의 조건부 동의 = Legislative Conditions of Its Consent to Treaties

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In most of States the executive has authority to negotiate, sign, ratify or other adhere to treaties, but the legislative may also have some voice in treaty-making process. In the Republic of Korea, too, article 60, paragragh 1 of the Constitution says The National Assembly shall have the right to consent to the conclusion and ratification of treaties pertaining to mutual assistance or mutual security; treaties concerning important international organizations; treaties of friendship, commerce and navigation; treaties pertaining to any restriction in sovereignty; peace treaties; treaties which will burden the State or people with an important financial obligation; or treaties related to legislative matters. Main theme of this paper is whether the Korean National Assembly may decide yes or no only regarding the treaty transmitted by the Executive or add/ change some conditions for the treaty ratification. In this paper author categorized legislative conditions into amendments, reservations, interpretative declarations and provisos, and analysed each condition`s legality and its legal effect. Conclusion can be summarized like following. The National Assembly`s decision to ask amendment of the treaty itself should be regarded as the rejection of its approval. It may add, delete or change the reservations for multilateral treaty suggested by the Executive. After legislative approval with some reservations, the Executive can not change them without legislative additional approval. The National Assembly may add, delete or change the interpretative declarations suggested by the Executive. The National Assembly may add some provisos for the treaty ratification. All legislative conditions are binding upon the Executive.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정종섭, "헌법학원론" 박영사 2006

2 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2006

3 김철수, "헌법학개론(제17전정신판)" 박영사 2005

4 이상훈, "헌법상 조약의 법적 성격에 대한 고찰 - 조약의 국내법적 효력 및 국회동의의 법적 성격을 중심으로" 2003

5 강경근, "헌법(신판)" 법문사 2004

6 김선택, "헌법 제60조 제1항에 열거된 조약의 체결?비준에 대한 국회의 동의권 (2006. 11. 3 헌법재판소 헌법판례연구회 발표문)"

7 이상훈, "헌법 제60조 제1항에 대한 고찰: 국회 동의의 법적 성격 및 입법사항에 관한 조약을 중심으로" 2 (2): 20003

8 허영, "한국헌법학" 박영사 2008

9 김부찬, "조약체결에 대한 국회 동의권에 관한 고찰 - 제1항의 개정 및 조약체결절차법의 제정 필요성과 관련하여" 대한국제법학회 52 (52): 57-89, 2007

10 제성호, "조약의 체결?비준에 대한 국회 동의권" 33 (33): 1988

11 정진석, "조약의 체결 비준에 대한 국회의 동의" 11 (11): 2004

12 정인섭, "조약 체결에 대한 국회의 사후동의" 9 (9): 2002

13 엄순영, "법의 세계화 - 조약체결권과 국회동의권의 법적 성격을 중심으로" 민주주의법학연구회 (32) : 187-218, 2006

14 외교통상부, "대한민국 조약목록" 외교통상부 2005

15 배종인, "대통령의 조약 체결 비준권과 이에 대한 국회의 동의권" 12 (12): 2006

16 "국회사 1-12" 국회사무처 ,1971-2007 1971

17 국회정책조정위원회, "국회법해설" 국회사무처 2004

18 정호영, "국회법론" 법문사 2000

19 정인섭, "條約締結에 대한 國會의 同意制度 - 재정적 부담을 지우는 조약을 중심으로" 43 (43): 2002

20 Congressional Research Service(Library of Congress), "Treaties and Other International Agreements: The Role of the United States Senate(106th Congress 2d Session)"

21 American Law Institute, "Restatement of Law 3rd, The Foreign Relations Law of the United States"

22 S. Riesenfeld, "Parliamentary Participation in the Making and Operation of Treaties" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1994

23 D. Hollis, "National Treaty Law and Practice" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2005

24 A. Aust, "Modern Treaty Law and Practice" Cambridge University Press 2000