RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Interval from Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Does Not Affect Immediate Operative Outcomes for Open or Minimally Invasive Approach

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104785413

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Traditionally, urologists recommend an interval of at least 4 weeks after prostate biopsybefore radical prostatectomy. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the intervalfrom prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy affects immediate operative outcomes, witha focus on differences in surgical approach. The study population of 1,848 radicalprostatectomy patients was divided into two groups according to the surgical approach:open or minimally invasive. Open group included perineal and retropubic approach, andminimally invasive group included laparoscopic and robotic approach. The cut-off of thebiopsy-to-surgery interval was 4 weeks. Positive surgical margin status, operative time andestimated blood loss were evaluated as endpoint parameters. In the open group, therewere significant differences in operative time and estimated blood loss between the< 4-week and ≥ 4-week interval subgroups, but there was no difference in positivemargin rate. In the minimally invasive group, there were no differences in the threeoutcome parameters between the two subgroups. Multivariate analysis revealed that thebiopsy-to-surgery interval was not a significant factor affecting immediate operativeoutcomes in both open and minimally invasive groups, with the exception of the interval< 4 weeks as a significant factor decreasing operative time in the minimally invasive group.

      In conclusion, performing open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy within 4 weeksof prostate biopsy is feasible for both approaches, and is even beneficial for minimallyinvasive radical prostatectomy to reduce operative time.
      번역하기

      Traditionally, urologists recommend an interval of at least 4 weeks after prostate biopsybefore radical prostatectomy. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the intervalfrom prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy affects immediate operative o...

      Traditionally, urologists recommend an interval of at least 4 weeks after prostate biopsybefore radical prostatectomy. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the intervalfrom prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy affects immediate operative outcomes, witha focus on differences in surgical approach. The study population of 1,848 radicalprostatectomy patients was divided into two groups according to the surgical approach:open or minimally invasive. Open group included perineal and retropubic approach, andminimally invasive group included laparoscopic and robotic approach. The cut-off of thebiopsy-to-surgery interval was 4 weeks. Positive surgical margin status, operative time andestimated blood loss were evaluated as endpoint parameters. In the open group, therewere significant differences in operative time and estimated blood loss between the< 4-week and ≥ 4-week interval subgroups, but there was no difference in positivemargin rate. In the minimally invasive group, there were no differences in the threeoutcome parameters between the two subgroups. Multivariate analysis revealed that thebiopsy-to-surgery interval was not a significant factor affecting immediate operativeoutcomes in both open and minimally invasive groups, with the exception of the interval< 4 weeks as a significant factor decreasing operative time in the minimally invasive group.

      In conclusion, performing open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy within 4 weeksof prostate biopsy is feasible for both approaches, and is even beneficial for minimallyinvasive radical prostatectomy to reduce operative time.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Reinke JM, "Wound repair and regeneration" 49 : 35-43, 2012

      2 Stitzenberg KB, "Trends in radical prostatectomy: centralization, robotics, and access to urologic cancer care" 118 : 54-62, 2012

      3 Adiyat KT, "Total prostatectomy within 6 weeks of a prostate biopsy: is it safe?" 36 : 177-181, 2010

      4 Krafts KP, "Tissue repair : The hidden drama" 6 : 225-233, 2010

      5 Ozden C, "The correlation between serum prostate specific antigen levels and asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis" 39 : 859-863, 2007

      6 Epstein JI, "The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology(ISUP)Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma" 29 : 1228-1242, 2005

      7 Jaffe J, "Surgical outcomes for men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate" 178 : 483-487, 2007

      8 Davey AK, "Surgical adhesions: a timely update, a great challenge for the future" 14 : 15-22, 2007

      9 Eggener SE, "Radical prostatectomy shortly after prostate biopsy does not affect operative difficulty or efficacy" 69 : 1128-1133, 2007

      10 Li J, "Pathophysiology of acute wound healing" 25 : 9-18, 2007

      1 Reinke JM, "Wound repair and regeneration" 49 : 35-43, 2012

      2 Stitzenberg KB, "Trends in radical prostatectomy: centralization, robotics, and access to urologic cancer care" 118 : 54-62, 2012

      3 Adiyat KT, "Total prostatectomy within 6 weeks of a prostate biopsy: is it safe?" 36 : 177-181, 2010

      4 Krafts KP, "Tissue repair : The hidden drama" 6 : 225-233, 2010

      5 Ozden C, "The correlation between serum prostate specific antigen levels and asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis" 39 : 859-863, 2007

      6 Epstein JI, "The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology(ISUP)Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma" 29 : 1228-1242, 2005

      7 Jaffe J, "Surgical outcomes for men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate" 178 : 483-487, 2007

      8 Davey AK, "Surgical adhesions: a timely update, a great challenge for the future" 14 : 15-22, 2007

      9 Eggener SE, "Radical prostatectomy shortly after prostate biopsy does not affect operative difficulty or efficacy" 69 : 1128-1133, 2007

      10 Li J, "Pathophysiology of acute wound healing" 25 : 9-18, 2007

      11 Dindo D, "Laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction : the reason for conversion matters" 24 : 792-797, 2010

      12 Nagle A, "Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction" 187 : 464-470, 2004

      13 Martin GL, "Interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy : effects on perioperative outcomes" 104 : 1734-1737, 2009

      14 김인성, "Interval from Prostate Biopsy to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (RALP): Effects on Surgical Difficulties" 대한비뇨기과학회 52 (52): 664-668, 2011

      15 Farinella E, "Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction" 4 : 3-, 2009

      16 Oesterling JE, "Effect of cystoscopy, prostate biopsy, and transurethral resection of prostate on serum prostate-specific antigen concentration" 42 : 276-282, 1993

      17 Lee DK, "Does the interval between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy affect the immediate postoperative outcome?" 97 : 48-50, 2006

      18 Martin AD, "Does a history of previous surgery or radiation to the prostate affect outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?" 103 : 1696-1698, 2009

      19 Okada K, "Correlation of histological inflammation in needle biopsy specimens with serum prostate-specific antigen levels in men with negative biopsy for prostate cancer" 55 : 892-898, 2000

      20 정규원, "Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival and Prevalence in 2010" 대한암학회 45 (45): 1-14, 2013

      21 Walsh PC, "Campbell-Walsh Urology" W. B. Saunders 2956-2978, 2007

      22 최훈, "Biopsy Related Prostate Status Does Not Affect on the Clinicopathological Outcome of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy" 대한암학회 41 (41): 205-210, 2009

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 SCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.48 0.37 1.06
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.85 0.75 0.691 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼