RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    현상학으로 본 생성형 AI와 인간의 의사소통 : 30대 여성 학문 연구자의 ChatGPT 사용 경험을 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109950721

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This phenomenological and sociolinguistic study investigates current human perceptions of dialogue with generative artificial intelligence (AI), focusing on intellectual, emotional, and moral dimensions. Participants were female humanities and social sciences researchers in their thirties with extensive AI experience. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews based on real-time interaction with ChatGPT and analyzed using Moustakas’ (1994) framework. Results indicate that AI was construed as a strategic collaborator restructuring information into research insights and as a creative mediator integrating diverse resources to generate solutions in academic, professional, and interpersonal contexts. Trust in AI, however, remained conditional, reflecting recognition of its limited autonomy and restricted reliability in expert domains. Emotionally and morally, AI was consistently framed as a non-agentive, emotionally neutral entity. Its affective expressions were interpreted as imitations rather than authentic emotions, and interactions were evaluated through human-centered criteria of utility, risk, and safety. This study provides phenomenological insights into human–AI interaction, showing that humans primarily view AI as an instrumental tool bounded by efficiency and safety. Ultimately, it raises a fundamental question: what constitutes genuine interaction between humans and AI, establishing a basis for future ethical discourse and development.
    번역하기

    This phenomenological and sociolinguistic study investigates current human perceptions of dialogue with generative artificial intelligence (AI), focusing on intellectual, emotional, and moral dimensions. Participants were female humanities and social ...

    This phenomenological and sociolinguistic study investigates current human perceptions of dialogue with generative artificial intelligence (AI), focusing on intellectual, emotional, and moral dimensions. Participants were female humanities and social sciences researchers in their thirties with extensive AI experience. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews based on real-time interaction with ChatGPT and analyzed using Moustakas’ (1994) framework. Results indicate that AI was construed as a strategic collaborator restructuring information into research insights and as a creative mediator integrating diverse resources to generate solutions in academic, professional, and interpersonal contexts. Trust in AI, however, remained conditional, reflecting recognition of its limited autonomy and restricted reliability in expert domains. Emotionally and morally, AI was consistently framed as a non-agentive, emotionally neutral entity. Its affective expressions were interpreted as imitations rather than authentic emotions, and interactions were evaluated through human-centered criteria of utility, risk, and safety. This study provides phenomenological insights into human–AI interaction, showing that humans primarily view AI as an instrumental tool bounded by efficiency and safety. Ultimately, it raises a fundamental question: what constitutes genuine interaction between humans and AI, establishing a basis for future ethical discourse and development.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 연구 대상과 방법
    • 3. 연구 결과
    • 3.1. 분석적 지능을 갖춘 소극적 문제해결자
    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 연구 대상과 방법
    • 3. 연구 결과
    • 3.1. 분석적 지능을 갖춘 소극적 문제해결자
    • 3.2. 사용자 환경에 국한된 수동적 존재
    • 3.3. 인간 중심적 목적에 종속된 형식적 감정의 존재
    • 3.4. 도덕적이어야 하는 인턴 정도의 비독립체
    • 4. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼