RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한ㆍ러 무역 10년의 성과와 과제

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77054069

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Korea and Russia have experienced tremendous change not only in their trade volume but in their trade structure since the normalization of their diplomatic relations in 1990.
      Comparing the two countries in structural change of export commodities classified by SITC 1 digit. Korea has been comparatively more stable than Russia. While more than half of Russian exports to Korea have continued to be concentrated in SITC 2 and 6, commodity group of Korean exports to Russia have spread over SITC 5. 6, 7 and 8 during the period under consideration.
      The two countries did not show a high and rising level of strong intra-industrial trade means. That means that the trade structure. i.e .. the structure of the division of labor. between the two countries has been stayed to a horizontal rather than vertical one. In other words. the foundation of sound economic cooperation between two countries has not been reinforced.
      Both countries have a comparative advantage in most of their top 10 and their top 30 exporting commodities which are classified by SITC 3 digit. However. it is notable that Korea has fewer commodity groups who has a comparative advantage not only in their top 10 but in the top 30 exporting commodities. A policy implication of this result is that. it is necessary for Korea to strengthen the productivity and competitiveness of its main exporting commodities to Russia and develop new higher value-added exporting items.
      번역하기

      Korea and Russia have experienced tremendous change not only in their trade volume but in their trade structure since the normalization of their diplomatic relations in 1990. Comparing the two countries in structural change of export commodities cl...

      Korea and Russia have experienced tremendous change not only in their trade volume but in their trade structure since the normalization of their diplomatic relations in 1990.
      Comparing the two countries in structural change of export commodities classified by SITC 1 digit. Korea has been comparatively more stable than Russia. While more than half of Russian exports to Korea have continued to be concentrated in SITC 2 and 6, commodity group of Korean exports to Russia have spread over SITC 5. 6, 7 and 8 during the period under consideration.
      The two countries did not show a high and rising level of strong intra-industrial trade means. That means that the trade structure. i.e .. the structure of the division of labor. between the two countries has been stayed to a horizontal rather than vertical one. In other words. the foundation of sound economic cooperation between two countries has not been reinforced.
      Both countries have a comparative advantage in most of their top 10 and their top 30 exporting commodities which are classified by SITC 3 digit. However. it is notable that Korea has fewer commodity groups who has a comparative advantage not only in their top 10 but in the top 30 exporting commodities. A policy implication of this result is that. it is necessary for Korea to strengthen the productivity and competitiveness of its main exporting commodities to Russia and develop new higher value-added exporting items.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 연구의 목적, 의의 및 방법
      • Ⅱ. 한국과 러시아간 무역의 추이와 위상
      • Ⅲ. 한국과 러시아간 무역구조
      • Ⅳ. 한국과 러시아의 경쟁력 분석
      • Ⅴ. 한국과 러시아간 무역의 과제
      • Ⅰ. 연구의 목적, 의의 및 방법
      • Ⅱ. 한국과 러시아간 무역의 추이와 위상
      • Ⅲ. 한국과 러시아간 무역구조
      • Ⅳ. 한국과 러시아의 경쟁력 분석
      • Ⅴ. 한국과 러시아간 무역의 과제
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼