RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    최근 대법원 퇴직금 판례의 법리 분석 = 대법원 2010. 5. 20. 선고 2007다90760 판결 ; 대법원 2010. 5. 27. 선고 2008다9150 판결 ; 대법원 2012. 10. 11. 선고 2010다95147 판결 ; 대법원 2012. 12. 25. 선고 2012다41045 판결

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99876597

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefit Act and Labor Standard Act are establishing retirement benefit scheme in detail. In spite of these statute laws, there are some blank areas to fill out with legal interpretations on these laws. Among them, contract of retirement allowance separation and calculation of early retirement benefits have been big issues in the academic circles and the bench and bar. Meanwhile, Supreme Court have made several decisions on those issues. This paper analyzes the Supreme Court decisions’ logics and their practical problems. Supreme Court have decided that irregular money given by employers is not the wage or payment defined in Labor Standard Act, and that calculation of early retirement benefits conducted by employers’ unilateral will is valid. This paper criticizes those points of view and points out the unreasonable results they may produce.
    번역하기

    Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefit Act and Labor Standard Act are establishing retirement benefit scheme in detail. In spite of these statute laws, there are some blank areas to fill out with legal interpretations on these laws. Among them, co...

    Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefit Act and Labor Standard Act are establishing retirement benefit scheme in detail. In spite of these statute laws, there are some blank areas to fill out with legal interpretations on these laws. Among them, contract of retirement allowance separation and calculation of early retirement benefits have been big issues in the academic circles and the bench and bar. Meanwhile, Supreme Court have made several decisions on those issues. This paper analyzes the Supreme Court decisions’ logics and their practical problems. Supreme Court have decided that irregular money given by employers is not the wage or payment defined in Labor Standard Act, and that calculation of early retirement benefits conducted by employers’ unilateral will is valid. This paper criticizes those points of view and points out the unreasonable results they may produce.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼