RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    위험을 수반한 과학기술의 낙인효과 = 원자력에 대한 위험인식이 방사선기술 이용 생산물에 대한 위험인식과 수용에 미치는 영향

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76210779

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examined how risk perception of nuclear power, formed by diverse factors, have influences the risk perception and acceptance of products based on radiation technology, in terms of stigma effect. For the study, a survey was conducted using telephone interview with 800 sample. The findings showed that risk perception of nuclear power was influenced by the risk characteristics, usefulness, and communication of nuclear power, and trustworthiness of institution related to nuclear power. In addition, the risk perception of nuclear power directly, and indirectly through risk perception of radiation, influenced the risk perception of products based on radiation technology. The risk perceptions of radiation and products based on radiation technology directly or indireclty influenced the acceptance of products based on radiation technology. The findings suggest how technology with risk is perceived and accepted by investigating how stigma on nuclear power, based on risk perception, influences the perception and acceptance of radiation and products based on radiation technology.
    번역하기

    This study examined how risk perception of nuclear power, formed by diverse factors, have influences the risk perception and acceptance of products based on radiation technology, in terms of stigma effect. For the study, a survey was conducted using t...

    This study examined how risk perception of nuclear power, formed by diverse factors, have influences the risk perception and acceptance of products based on radiation technology, in terms of stigma effect. For the study, a survey was conducted using telephone interview with 800 sample. The findings showed that risk perception of nuclear power was influenced by the risk characteristics, usefulness, and communication of nuclear power, and trustworthiness of institution related to nuclear power. In addition, the risk perception of nuclear power directly, and indirectly through risk perception of radiation, influenced the risk perception of products based on radiation technology. The risk perceptions of radiation and products based on radiation technology directly or indireclty influenced the acceptance of products based on radiation technology. The findings suggest how technology with risk is perceived and accepted by investigating how stigma on nuclear power, based on risk perception, influences the perception and acceptance of radiation and products based on radiation technology.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김영평, "한국인의 위험인지와 정책적 함의" 29 (29): 935-954, 1995

    2 설동훈, "한국인의 위험인식" 20 (20): 22-61, 1998

    3 조성겸, "지역주민을 대상으로 하는 리스크 커뮤니케이션 모형 구축을 위한 시도: 정읍방사선과학연구소와 정읍 주민과의 관계를 중심으로" 2007

    4 박동석, "전라북도 방사선 기술(RT)산업 육성 방안" 16 (16): 73-91, 2002

    5 오미영, "원자력에 대한 이해증진을 위한 효율적인 홍보전략" 8 (8): 192-215, 2004

    6 오미영, "원자력에 대한 사회적 합의형성을 위한 커뮤니케이션 전략" 한국원자력문화재단 2004

    7 안형기, "원자력관리를 위한 통합적 접근모형" 13 (13): 2000

    8 안형기, "원자력 위험의 사회적 특성과 인식모형" 39-61, 2001

    9 한동섭, "원자력 여론형성과 커뮤니케이션" 한국원자력안전기술원 2003

    10 김학수 , "방사선조사 식품의 국민이해 연구" 6 (6): 1-12, 2001

    1 김영평, "한국인의 위험인지와 정책적 함의" 29 (29): 935-954, 1995

    2 설동훈, "한국인의 위험인식" 20 (20): 22-61, 1998

    3 조성겸, "지역주민을 대상으로 하는 리스크 커뮤니케이션 모형 구축을 위한 시도: 정읍방사선과학연구소와 정읍 주민과의 관계를 중심으로" 2007

    4 박동석, "전라북도 방사선 기술(RT)산업 육성 방안" 16 (16): 73-91, 2002

    5 오미영, "원자력에 대한 이해증진을 위한 효율적인 홍보전략" 8 (8): 192-215, 2004

    6 오미영, "원자력에 대한 사회적 합의형성을 위한 커뮤니케이션 전략" 한국원자력문화재단 2004

    7 안형기, "원자력관리를 위한 통합적 접근모형" 13 (13): 2000

    8 안형기, "원자력 위험의 사회적 특성과 인식모형" 39-61, 2001

    9 한동섭, "원자력 여론형성과 커뮤니케이션" 한국원자력안전기술원 2003

    10 김학수 , "방사선조사 식품의 국민이해 연구" 6 (6): 1-12, 2001

    11 전북발전연구원, "방사선융합기술산업 육성방안 예비연구" 2003

    12 최승진, "대한방사선방어학회 춘계심포지움: 방사선위험 이해의 문제와 교육의 역할" 1997

    13 Frewer, L. J., "What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs" 16 : 473-486, 1996

    14 Zeiss, C., "Waste facility impacts on residential property values" 115 (115): 64-80, 1989

    15 Edelstein, M. R., "Toward a theory of environmental stigma" Environmental Design Research Association 21-25, 1987

    16 Wildavsky, R., "Theories of risk perception: Who Fears what and why? DAEDALUS, 119, 41∼60"

    17 Pidgeon, N., "The social amplification of risk" Cambridge University Press 2003

    18 West, B., "The reporter’s environmental handbook" Rutgers University Press 1995

    19 Hunsperger, W., "The effects of the rocky flats nuclear weapons plant on neighboring property values" Earthscan Publications 2001

    20 Nemeroff, C., "The contagion concept in adult thinking in the United States: Transmission of germs and interpersonal influence" 22 : 158-186, 1994

    21 Rozin, P., "Technological stigma: Some perspectives from the study of contagion" Earthscan Publications 2001

    22 Gregory, R., "Technological stigma" American Scientist 220-223, 1995

    23 Goffman, E., "Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity" Prentice Hall 1963

    24 Slovic, P., "Stigma happens: Social problems in the siting of nuclear waste facilities" 14 (14): 773-777, 1994

    25 Jones, E., "Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships" W. H. Freeman 1984

    26 Starr, C., "Social benefit versus technological risk" 165 : 1232-1238, 1969

    27 Kasperson, R. E., "Six propositions and public participation and their relevance for risk communication" 6 (6): 275-282, 1986

    28 Slovic,P, "Scientific versus public perceptions of environmental risks: Where is the reality? Paper Presented at the 160th national meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, CA"

    29 Kasperson, R. E., "Risk, Media and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology" Earthscan Publications 2001

    30 Sjoberg, L., "Risk perception in Western Europe" Ambio 555-568, 1999

    31 Starr, C., "Risk management, assessment, and acceptability" 5 : 97-102, 1985

    32 Douglas, M., "Risk and culture" California University of California Press 1982

    33 Gadner, G. T., "Risk and benefit perceptions, acceptability, judgments, and self reported actions toward nuclear power" 116 : 179-197, 1982

    34 Adams, J., "Risk" UCL Press 1995

    35 Sandman, P. M., "Responding to community outrage: Strategies for effective risk communication" American Industrial Hygiene Association 1993

    36 Singer, E., "Reporting on risk: How the media portray accidents, diseases, disasters, and other hazards" Russell Sage Foundation 1993

    37 Sparks, P., "Public perceptions of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: An empirical study" 14 : 799-806, 1994

    38 Slovic, P., "Perception of risk" Science 280-285, 1987

    39 Slovic, P., "Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste" Science 1603-1607, 1991

    40 Slovic, P., "Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada" 11 (11): 683-696, 1991

    41 Otway, H., "Nuclear power: The question of public acceptance" Future 69-82, 1978

    42 Tversky, A., "Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases" 211 (211): 1453-1458, 1974

    43 Vyner, H., "Invisible trauma: The psychological effects of invisible environmental contaminants" Lexington Books 1988

    44 Slovic, P., "Informing and educating the public about risk" 6 : 403-416, 1986

    45 Griffin, R., "Information sufficiency and risk communication" 6 : 23-61, 2004

    46 Fischhoff, B., "How safe is safe enough?: A psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risks and benefits" Policy Science 127-152, 1978

    47 Graham, J. D., "How risks are identified and assessed" 545 : 15-24, 1996

    48 Eastering, D., "Fear and loathing of Las Vegas: Will a nuclear waste repository contaminate the imagery of nearby places" Earthscan Publications 2001

    49 Woo, T. O., "Expectancy-value and selective exposure as determinants of attitudes toward a nuclear power plant" 10 (10): 224-234, 1980

    50 Cha, Y., "Environmental risk analysis: Factors influencing nuclear risk perception and policy implications" Albany 1997

    51 Mazur, A., "Does public perception of risk explain the social response to potential hazard" 11 (11): 41-45, 1987

    52 Mirel, B., "Debating nuclear energy: Theories of risk and purpose of communication" 3 (3): 41-65, 1994

    53 Edelstein, M. R., "Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure" Westview Press 1988

    54 Whol, J. B., "Consumers’ decision-making and risk perceptions regarding foods produced with biotechnology" 21 : 387-404, 1998

    55 Knox, B., "Consumer perception and understanding of risk from food" 56 (56): 97-109, 2000

    56 Kleinhesselink, R., "Cognitive representation of risk perceptions: A comparison of Japan and United States" 22 (22): 11-28, 1991

    57 Slovic, P., "Characterizing perceived risk" Westview Press 1985

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.75 1.75 1.94
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.07 2.11 2.773 0.4
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼