RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      『로미오와 줄리엣』에서 반사회적 행위에서 출발하는 상호인식의 사랑법 = Love of Mutual Recognition Based on Anti-social Actions in Romeo and Juliet

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101806216

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This article aims to reveal that Romeo and Juliet reach mutual recognition, which presupposes their individualities and their mutual understanding. Thereby they achieve a new way of love which had not been accepted in Western philosophical history. In...

      This article aims to reveal that Romeo and Juliet reach mutual recognition, which presupposes their individualities and their mutual understanding. Thereby they achieve a new way of love which had not been accepted in Western philosophical history. In addition, their mutual recognition started from their anti-social actions. Through their anti-social actions, Romeo and Juliet do not come to accept the ideological demands as they are; instead, they become to be independent selves. Namely, their secret love makes it possible for them to be the ones detached from the ideological demands, such as parents oppression, so they can obtain individualities that are freed from the world’s demands. Obtaining individualities leads to obtaining mutual recognition about each other. Romeo says if she (Juliet) does not like the names of ‘Romeo’ or ‘Montague’, he would renounce the both, which means that what is important to them is not the perspectives of the people and the world but how they regard each other. Regarding each other in a meaningful way leads to mutual recognition. Furthermore, they want to know more about each other. Really knowing each other signifies that they come to understand each other more and they recognize each other more. They love not because they want to satisfy their fantastical lack, but their love is based upon sincerity. This signifies that their love is self-fulfilling as it is, and is not that which tries to delay the satisfaction of love, and to make the other party tantalized. Regarding each other in a meaningful way and love based on sincerity can be called love of mutual recognition.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최재헌, "페트라르카의 전통에 대한 도전:존 던의 『엘레지에 그려진 여성의 몸" 한국영미어문학회 (79) : 19-38, 2006

      2 이부영, "자기와 자기실현" 한길사 2002

      3 칼 야스퍼스, "이성과 실존" 서문당 1999

      4 이병탁, "아도르노의 경험의 반란" 북코리아 2013

      5 마샤 누스바움, "감정의 격동" 새물결 2015

      6 김희라, "「로미오와 줄리엣」에 나타난 사랑의 자기애적 구조" 한국셰익스피어학회 39 (39): 315-334, 2003

      7 Honegger, Thomas, "‘Wouldst thou withdraw love’s faithful vow?’: The Negotiation of Love in the Orchard Scene" 7 (7): 73-88, 2006

      8 Wheeler, Jamie, "‘Wedded to Calamity’: Considering Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet Against the Popular Conduct Literature of the Renaissance" 5 : 155-170, 2005

      9 Davis, Lloyd, "‘Death-marked love’: Desire and Presence in Romeo and Juliet" 49 : 57-67, 1996

      10 Carroll, William, "We Were Born to Die: Romeo and Juliet" 15 (15): 54-71, 1981

      1 최재헌, "페트라르카의 전통에 대한 도전:존 던의 『엘레지에 그려진 여성의 몸" 한국영미어문학회 (79) : 19-38, 2006

      2 이부영, "자기와 자기실현" 한길사 2002

      3 칼 야스퍼스, "이성과 실존" 서문당 1999

      4 이병탁, "아도르노의 경험의 반란" 북코리아 2013

      5 마샤 누스바움, "감정의 격동" 새물결 2015

      6 김희라, "「로미오와 줄리엣」에 나타난 사랑의 자기애적 구조" 한국셰익스피어학회 39 (39): 315-334, 2003

      7 Honegger, Thomas, "‘Wouldst thou withdraw love’s faithful vow?’: The Negotiation of Love in the Orchard Scene" 7 (7): 73-88, 2006

      8 Wheeler, Jamie, "‘Wedded to Calamity’: Considering Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet Against the Popular Conduct Literature of the Renaissance" 5 : 155-170, 2005

      9 Davis, Lloyd, "‘Death-marked love’: Desire and Presence in Romeo and Juliet" 49 : 57-67, 1996

      10 Carroll, William, "We Were Born to Die: Romeo and Juliet" 15 (15): 54-71, 1981

      11 Clark, Glenn, "The Civil Mutinies of Romeo and Juliet" 41 (41): 280-300, 2011

      12 Broyles, Scott, "Shakespeare’s Reflections on Love and Law in Romeo and Juliet" 18 : 75-115, 2013

      13 Charney, Maurice, "Shakespeare on Love and Lust" Colombia UP 2000

      14 Pamela, Jensen, "Shakespeare and the Body Politic" Lexington Books 95-116, 2013

      15 Shakespeare, William, "Romeo and Juliet" Oxford UP 1982

      16 Targoff, Ramie, "Mortal Love: Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and the Practice of Joint Burial" 120 (120): 17-38, 2012

      17 Zender, Karl, "Loving Shakespeare’s Lovers: Character Growth in Romeo and Juliet" 67 : 137-143, 2000

      18 MacKenzie, Clayton, "Love, Sex and Death in Romeo and Juliet" 88 (88): 22-42, 2007

      19 Kamps, Ivo, "I Love You Madly, I Love You to Death" 67 : 37-46, 2000

      20 Young, Bruce, "Haste, Consent, and Age at Marriage: Some Implications of Social History for Romeo and Juliet" 62 (62): 459-474, 1988

      21 Kottman, Paul, "Defying the Stars: Tragic Love as the Struggle for Freedom in Romeo and Juliet" 63 : 1-38, 2012

      22 Dollimore, Jonathan, "Death, Desire and Loss in Western Culture" Routledge 2001

      23 Siegel, Paul, "Christianity and the Religion of Love in Romeo and Juliet" 12 (12): 371-392, 1961

      24 Schuyler, Carole, "A.C. Bradley’s Concept of the Sublime in Romeo and Juliet" 5 : 66-79, 2005

      25 Roberts, Sasha, "A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works" Blackwell Pub 108-133, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2017-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.32 0.32 0.33
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.46 0.49 0.732 0.5
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼