RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    인터넷 상에서 소비자의 상호작용 스타일이 불평행동에 미치는 영향: 정성적 연구와 정량적 연구의 통합적 접근 = A Multimethod Study on the Effects of Consumers` Interaction Styles on Complaint Behavior

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82602583

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Internet creates new virtual markets. The interests of both practitioners and academicians on the Internet market are increasing. The reason why the interests on Internet market is growing is based on characteristics of the Internet media. Previous researches have focused on interactive characteristics of the Internet as its competitive advantage. They suggest that interaction influences on attitude, purchase intention, loyalty, revisit intention, and advertising responses. This study focuses on a few issues of previous interaction research. First, previous research explains interaction from a company (website) perspective. Second, interaction research measures interaction as the level (high vs. low). Therefore, this study attempts to delve into different interaction styles from a consumer perspective. In particular, the purpose of this research is to determine the extent to which the interaction styles of assertiveness and aggression apply in website-consumer interactions. Also, this study attempts to develop measures of these interaction styles that possess acceptable levels of reliability and validity, and to examine the effects of interaction styles on consumers` complaint behavior. This research employes the multi-method approach which includes both a qualitative (study 1) and a quantitative methodology (study 2 and study 3). Study 1 identifies consumer interaction styles in website-consumer relationship using a qualitative methodology. Results reveal that both similarities and differences exist between interpersonal and non-interpersonal interaction styles. Study 2 reports the development of scales measuring interaction styles. From an item purification, 3 factors with 12 items were derived. The factor composition reflects the domains and constructs. Two factors are composed of assertiveness items regarding requesting information/assistance and remedy seeking. Another factor reflects aggressiveness. Cronbach`s alpha and composite reliability shows acceptable levels of internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis provides evidence for the discriminant and convergent validity of the measures. Study 3 was conducted to support the evidence of the reliability and validity developed in Study 2 and to examine the influences of interaction styles on complaint behaviors. The results provide additional evidence for the scales` reliability and validity, and show the robustness of the measures. Four consumer interaction styles were identified. The passive consumers(low assertion and low aggressiveness) seem to have the lowest propensity to engage in all types of complaining behavior because they have less favorable complaining attitude. However, the effects of aggressiveness and assertiveness are mixed. Assertive consumers (high assertion and low aggressiveness) have the higher voicing intention than non-assertive consumers (low assertion and high aggressiveness), while aggressive consumers are associated with complaint to friends, e-masses, and third parties compared to non-aggressive consumers. Assertion-aggression consumers (high assertion, high aggressiveness) have the highest complaining behavior intention than any of the other groups. Given these findings, the results contribute theoretical development in the area of consumer behavior study. Also, this research gives valuable information to both academicians and practitioners. Despite these meaningful contributions, this research has some limitations. Thus, much more future research endeavors on Internet interaction styles are needed in order to advance the field in a meaningful way.
    번역하기

    Internet creates new virtual markets. The interests of both practitioners and academicians on the Internet market are increasing. The reason why the interests on Internet market is growing is based on characteristics of the Internet media. Previous re...

    Internet creates new virtual markets. The interests of both practitioners and academicians on the Internet market are increasing. The reason why the interests on Internet market is growing is based on characteristics of the Internet media. Previous researches have focused on interactive characteristics of the Internet as its competitive advantage. They suggest that interaction influences on attitude, purchase intention, loyalty, revisit intention, and advertising responses. This study focuses on a few issues of previous interaction research. First, previous research explains interaction from a company (website) perspective. Second, interaction research measures interaction as the level (high vs. low). Therefore, this study attempts to delve into different interaction styles from a consumer perspective. In particular, the purpose of this research is to determine the extent to which the interaction styles of assertiveness and aggression apply in website-consumer interactions. Also, this study attempts to develop measures of these interaction styles that possess acceptable levels of reliability and validity, and to examine the effects of interaction styles on consumers` complaint behavior. This research employes the multi-method approach which includes both a qualitative (study 1) and a quantitative methodology (study 2 and study 3). Study 1 identifies consumer interaction styles in website-consumer relationship using a qualitative methodology. Results reveal that both similarities and differences exist between interpersonal and non-interpersonal interaction styles. Study 2 reports the development of scales measuring interaction styles. From an item purification, 3 factors with 12 items were derived. The factor composition reflects the domains and constructs. Two factors are composed of assertiveness items regarding requesting information/assistance and remedy seeking. Another factor reflects aggressiveness. Cronbach`s alpha and composite reliability shows acceptable levels of internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis provides evidence for the discriminant and convergent validity of the measures. Study 3 was conducted to support the evidence of the reliability and validity developed in Study 2 and to examine the influences of interaction styles on complaint behaviors. The results provide additional evidence for the scales` reliability and validity, and show the robustness of the measures. Four consumer interaction styles were identified. The passive consumers(low assertion and low aggressiveness) seem to have the lowest propensity to engage in all types of complaining behavior because they have less favorable complaining attitude. However, the effects of aggressiveness and assertiveness are mixed. Assertive consumers (high assertion and low aggressiveness) have the higher voicing intention than non-assertive consumers (low assertion and high aggressiveness), while aggressive consumers are associated with complaint to friends, e-masses, and third parties compared to non-aggressive consumers. Assertion-aggression consumers (high assertion, high aggressiveness) have the highest complaining behavior intention than any of the other groups. Given these findings, the results contribute theoretical development in the area of consumer behavior study. Also, this research gives valuable information to both academicians and practitioners. Despite these meaningful contributions, this research has some limitations. Thus, much more future research endeavors on Internet interaction styles are needed in order to advance the field in a meaningful way.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이장로, "한국 미국 소비자 e-불평행동의 수렴과 상이:e-소비자불평행동 유형 정립을 위한 탐색적 연구" 한국국제경영학회 18 (18): 83-111, 2007

    2 이승희, "패션 T-commerce 구매의도의 영향요인에 관한 연구: 확장 기술수용모형(TAM)을 중심으로" 한국소비자학회 22 (22): 93-115, 2011

    3 송창석, "인터넷상의 상호작용성 제고방안에 관한 연구" 14 (14): 69-95, 1999

    4 이지인, "인터넷 의류 쇼핑몰의 이미지 상호작용 기술에 따른 커뮤니케이션 기능 지각과 효과" 한국소비자학회 21 (21): 417-441, 2010

    5 서문식, "인터넷 쇼핑상황에서 경험하는 소비자 감정에 관한 질적 연구" 한국소비자학회 13 (13): 3-80, 2002

    6 이두희, "인터넷 쇼핑몰에서의 상호작용성에 관한 연구" 16 (16): 115-140, 2001

    7 박철, "온라인 소비자행동 연구의 현황과 과제" 한국소비자학회 21 (21): 289-320, 2010

    8 홍성태, "소비자의 심리유형별 구매행동의 차이에 관한 실증적 연구" 10 (10): 1-22, 1999

    9 김재일, "소비자-브랜드 관계와 브랜드 충성도에 관한 정성적 연구" 한국마케팅학회 6 (6): 27-58, 2004

    10 백병성, "소비자 불평행동 결정요인: 한국과 미국의 비교를 중심으로" 한국소비자학회 20 (20): 75-98, 2009

    1 이장로, "한국 미국 소비자 e-불평행동의 수렴과 상이:e-소비자불평행동 유형 정립을 위한 탐색적 연구" 한국국제경영학회 18 (18): 83-111, 2007

    2 이승희, "패션 T-commerce 구매의도의 영향요인에 관한 연구: 확장 기술수용모형(TAM)을 중심으로" 한국소비자학회 22 (22): 93-115, 2011

    3 송창석, "인터넷상의 상호작용성 제고방안에 관한 연구" 14 (14): 69-95, 1999

    4 이지인, "인터넷 의류 쇼핑몰의 이미지 상호작용 기술에 따른 커뮤니케이션 기능 지각과 효과" 한국소비자학회 21 (21): 417-441, 2010

    5 서문식, "인터넷 쇼핑상황에서 경험하는 소비자 감정에 관한 질적 연구" 한국소비자학회 13 (13): 3-80, 2002

    6 이두희, "인터넷 쇼핑몰에서의 상호작용성에 관한 연구" 16 (16): 115-140, 2001

    7 박철, "온라인 소비자행동 연구의 현황과 과제" 한국소비자학회 21 (21): 289-320, 2010

    8 홍성태, "소비자의 심리유형별 구매행동의 차이에 관한 실증적 연구" 10 (10): 1-22, 1999

    9 김재일, "소비자-브랜드 관계와 브랜드 충성도에 관한 정성적 연구" 한국마케팅학회 6 (6): 27-58, 2004

    10 백병성, "소비자 불평행동 결정요인: 한국과 미국의 비교를 중심으로" 한국소비자학회 20 (20): 75-98, 2009

    11 유창조, "기업상표와 개별상표의 이미지가 소비자의 차종선택에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 16 (16): 113-136, 2001

    12 박지훈, "국가 간 소비자불평의도 선행요인에 관한 비교 연구" 한국경영학회 38 (38): 1085-1114, 2009

    13 Alberti, Robert E., "Your Perfect Right: A Guide to Assertive Behavior" Impact 1974

    14 Cho, Chang-Hoan, "The state of internet-related research in communications, marketing, and advertising: 1994-2003" 35 (35): 147-163, 2006

    15 Buss, Arnold H., "The Psychology of Aggression" John Wiley 1961

    16 Costa, Paul T., Jr., "The NEO Personality Inventory Manual" Psychological Assessment Resources 1985

    17 Cho, Yooncheong, "The Impact of E-service Failures and Customer Complaints on Electronic Commerce Customer Relationship Management" 16 (16): 6-118, 2003

    18 Spradley, James P., "The Ethnographic Interview" Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1979

    19 Glaser, Barney G., "The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research" Aldine de Gruyter 1967

    20 Landon, E. Laird. Jr., "The Direction of Consumer Complaint Research" 7 : 335-338, 1980

    21 Grandey, Alicia A., "The Customer Is Not Always Right: Customer Aggression and Emotion Regulation of Service Employees" 25 : 297-418, 2004

    22 Crutsinger, Christy, "Teens' Consumer Interaction Styles: the Impact of Assertive and Aggressive Behavior on Attitudes towards Marketing Practices" 34 : 196-203, 2010

    23 Anderson, James C., "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommendation Two-Step Approach" 103 (103): 411-423, 1988

    24 Slama, Mark E., "Self-Presentation and Consumer Interaction Styles" 10 (10): 19-30, 1995

    25 Bearden, William O., "Selected Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction and Complaint Reports" 20 : 21-28, 1983

    26 Goodwin, Cathy, "Salient Dimensions of Perceived Fairness in Resolution of Service Complaint" 2 : 87-92, 1989

    27 Segars, Albert, "Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis" 17 (17): 517-525, 1993

    28 Nunnally, Jum C., "Psychometric Theory" McGraw-Hill 1978

    29 Bagozzi, Richard P., "On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Model" 16 (16): 74-94, 1988

    30 Bezjian-Avery, Alexa, "New Media Interactive Advertising vs. Traditional Advertising" 38 (38): 23-32, 1998

    31 Mahoney, Gerald, "Modifying Parent-Child Interaction: Enhancing the Development of Handicapped Children" 22 : 82-96, 1988

    32 Burns, David J., "Marketplace Interaction Styles and Consumer Free-Riding: The Relationship Between Assertiveness and Aggressiveness and Attitudes Toward Consumer Free-Riding" 28 (28): 35-48, 2007

    33 Hoffman, Donna L., "Marketing in Hypermedia Computer Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations" 60 (60): 50-68, 1996

    34 Nass, Clifford I., "Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers" 56 (56): 81-103, 2000

    35 Moon, Youngme, "Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers" 26 (26): 323-339, 2000

    36 Massey, Brian L., "Interactivity, Online Journalism, and Englishlanguage Web Newspapers in Asia" 76 (76): 138-151, 1999

    37 Fortin, David R., "Interactivity and Vividness Effects on Social Presence and Involvement with a Web-Based Advertisement" 58 (58): 387-396, 2005

    38 Dholakia, Ruby Roy, "Interactivity and Revisits to Websites: A Theoretical Framework" Research Institute for Telecommunications and Information Marketing 2000

    39 Cho, Chang-Hoan, "Interactivity As a Measure of Advertising Effectiveness" 1999

    40 Moon, Youngme, "How Real are Computer Personalities" Psychological Responses to Personality Types in Human-Computer Interactions" 23 : 651-674, 1996

    41 Rose, Randall L., "From Rudeness to Road Rage: The Antecedents and Consequences of Consumer Aggression" 26 : 12-17, 1999

    42 Harrison-Walker, L. Jean, "E-complaining: A Content Analysis of An Internet Complaint Forum" 15 (15): 397-412, 2001

    43 Hersen, Michel, "Development of Assertive Response: Clinical Measurement and Research Consideration" 11 : 515-521, 1973

    44 Fornell, Claes, "Defensive Marketing Strategy by Customer Complaint Management" 24 : 337-346, 1987

    45 Tronvoll, Bard, "Customer Complaint Behavior from the Perspective of the Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing" 17 (17): 601-620, 2007

    46 Fournier, Susan, "Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research" 24 : 343-373, 1998

    47 Andreasen, Alan R., "Consumer Satisfaction in Loose Monopolies: The Case of Medical Care" 2 : 122-135, 1984

    48 Folkes, Valerie S., "Consumer Reactions to Product Failure: An Attributional Approach" 10 : 398-409, 1984

    49 Slama, Mark E., "Consumer Interaction Styles and Purchase Complaint Intentions" 4 : 167-174, 1991

    50 Singh, Jagdip, "Consumer Complaint Intentions and Behaviors' Definitional and Taxonomical Issues" 52 : 93-107, 1988

    51 McFall, Richard M., "Behavior Rehearsal with Modeling and Coaching in Assertion Training" 77 : 313-323, 1971

    52 Hall, James R., "Assessment of Assertiveness" 4 : 321-357, 1978

    53 Swanson, Scott R., "Assertiveness and Aggressiveness as Potential Moderators of Consumers' Verbal Behavior Following a Failure of Service" 82 : 1239-1247, 1998

    54 Richins, Marcha L., "Assertiveness and Aggression in Marketplace Exchanges: Testing Measure Equivalence" 18 : 93-105, 1987

    55 Galassi, Merna D., "Assertion: A Critical Review" 15 : 16-29, 1978

    56 Spiggle, Susan, "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research" 21 (21): 491-503, 1994

    57 Bearden, William O., "An Investigation of Influences on Consumer Complaint Reports" 11 : 490-495, 1984

    58 Richins, Marcha L., "An Investigation of Consumers Attitudes Towards Complaining" 10 : 73-82, 1982

    59 Cohen, Joel B., "An Interpersonal Orientation to the Study of Consumer Behavior" 4 (4): 270-278, 1967

    60 Fornell, Claes, "An Exploratory Study of Assertiveness, Aggressiveness, and Consumer Complaining Behavior" 6 : 105-110, 1979

    61 Richins, Marcha L., "An Analysis of Consumer Interaction Styles in the Marketplace" 10 : 73-82, 1983

    62 Haeckel, Stephan H., "About the Nature and Future of Interactive Marketing" 12 (12): 63-71, 1996

    63 Singh, Jagdip, "A Typology of Consumer Dissatisfaction Response Style" 66 (66): 57-99, 1990

    64 Wiggins, Jerry. S., "A Psychological Taxonomy of Trait-Descriptive Terms: The Interpersonal Domain" 37 : 395-412, 1979

    65 LaBarbera, Priscilla A., "A Longitudinal Assessment of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction: The Dynamic Aspect of the Cognitive Process" 20 : 393-404, 1983

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼