RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    감정조절전략과 조직시민행동의 관계에 대한 심리적 주인의식의 조절효과

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to examine the main effect of emotional regulation and psychological ownership on employee’s organizational citizenship behavior. Also we verified the moderating effect of psychological ownership on the relationship between emotional regulation and psychological ownership. To empirically test these relationships, data were collected from 470 respondents who were working in service encounter and interact with customers. A SEM (structural equation model) was used for the test of hypotheses.
    Findings are as follows. First, it turned out that deep acting increases organizational citizenship behavior whereas surface acting had no effect on the organizational citizenship behavior. Also, it was confirmed that psychological ownership increases organizational citizenship behavior.
    Second, analysis showed that the moderating effect of psychological ownership in the relationship between emotional regulation (surface acting, deep acting) and organizational citizenship behavior is significant in both the cases of surface acting and deep acting. The employees with an overall high level of psychological ownership display a higher level of organizational citizenship behavior than an employee with a low level of psychological ownership in the cases of both surface acting and deep acting. However, moderating effects of psychological ownership on organizational citizenship behavior showed different pattern for surface acting and deep acting. In the case of high level of psychological ownership, deep acting increased organizational citizenship behavior, and surface acting decreased organizational citizenship behavior. In the case of low level of psychological ownership, however, deep acting had minimal effect on organizational citizenship behavior and surface acting actually increased organizational citizenship behavior.
    In conclusion, this paper confirmed that the research findings of previous studies on emotional labor and organizational citizenship behavior are not applicable to all emotional laborers, but are limited to those with a high level of psychological ownership. A discussion on the results of the analysis, as well as managerial implications and limitations will be presented in the discussion that follows.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to examine the main effect of emotional regulation and psychological ownership on employee’s organizational citizenship behavior. Also we verified the moderating effect of psychological ownership on the relationship betw...

    The purpose of this study is to examine the main effect of emotional regulation and psychological ownership on employee’s organizational citizenship behavior. Also we verified the moderating effect of psychological ownership on the relationship between emotional regulation and psychological ownership. To empirically test these relationships, data were collected from 470 respondents who were working in service encounter and interact with customers. A SEM (structural equation model) was used for the test of hypotheses.
    Findings are as follows. First, it turned out that deep acting increases organizational citizenship behavior whereas surface acting had no effect on the organizational citizenship behavior. Also, it was confirmed that psychological ownership increases organizational citizenship behavior.
    Second, analysis showed that the moderating effect of psychological ownership in the relationship between emotional regulation (surface acting, deep acting) and organizational citizenship behavior is significant in both the cases of surface acting and deep acting. The employees with an overall high level of psychological ownership display a higher level of organizational citizenship behavior than an employee with a low level of psychological ownership in the cases of both surface acting and deep acting. However, moderating effects of psychological ownership on organizational citizenship behavior showed different pattern for surface acting and deep acting. In the case of high level of psychological ownership, deep acting increased organizational citizenship behavior, and surface acting decreased organizational citizenship behavior. In the case of low level of psychological ownership, however, deep acting had minimal effect on organizational citizenship behavior and surface acting actually increased organizational citizenship behavior.
    In conclusion, this paper confirmed that the research findings of previous studies on emotional labor and organizational citizenship behavior are not applicable to all emotional laborers, but are limited to those with a high level of psychological ownership. A discussion on the results of the analysis, as well as managerial implications and limitations will be presented in the discussion that follows.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 배성현, "조직공정성과 조직결과변수간의 관계에서 심리적 주인의식의 매개효과 및 부정적 성향의 조절효과" 한국인적자원관리학회 17 (17): 97-126, 2010

    2 김영조, "서비스 직원의 감정노동 수행과 직무소진의 관계에 관한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 32 (32): 95-128, 2008

    3 백윤정, "서비스 직무 담당자의 직무관련 정서상태와 직무전념 간의 관계에서 감정표현규칙의 조절효과에 대한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 38 (38): 55-76, 2014

    4 최용득, "리더의 유머사용과 구성원의 성과 및 행복: 리더신뢰의 조절효과와 긍정심리자본의 매개효과" 한국경영학회 41 (41): 575-605, 2012

    5 홍세희, "구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거" 19 (19): 161-177, 2000

    6 이재원, "고객 상호작용 불공정성, 심층적 행위, 긍정정서 전달행위사이 관계" 한국인사관리학회 38 (38): 213-234, 2014

    7 전희진, "감정표현규칙 몰입에 관한 연구: 감정표현규칙 몰입의선행변수와 결과변수" 한국인사관리학회 37 (37): 37-64, 2013

    8 공혜원, "감정조절전략이 조직시민행동에 미치는 차별적 효과: 직무소진의 매개효과를 중심으로" 한국인사관리학회 38 (38): 001-031, 2014

    9 박상언, "감정부조화와 감성지능이 서비스직 사원의 비과업행동에 미치는 영향" 한국경영학회 39 (39): 963-994, 2010

    10 임창희, "감정노동자의 이직의도에 미치는 유머와 유머선호도의 조절효과" 한국인사조직학회 17 (17): 1-36, 2009

    1 배성현, "조직공정성과 조직결과변수간의 관계에서 심리적 주인의식의 매개효과 및 부정적 성향의 조절효과" 한국인적자원관리학회 17 (17): 97-126, 2010

    2 김영조, "서비스 직원의 감정노동 수행과 직무소진의 관계에 관한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 32 (32): 95-128, 2008

    3 백윤정, "서비스 직무 담당자의 직무관련 정서상태와 직무전념 간의 관계에서 감정표현규칙의 조절효과에 대한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 38 (38): 55-76, 2014

    4 최용득, "리더의 유머사용과 구성원의 성과 및 행복: 리더신뢰의 조절효과와 긍정심리자본의 매개효과" 한국경영학회 41 (41): 575-605, 2012

    5 홍세희, "구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거" 19 (19): 161-177, 2000

    6 이재원, "고객 상호작용 불공정성, 심층적 행위, 긍정정서 전달행위사이 관계" 한국인사관리학회 38 (38): 213-234, 2014

    7 전희진, "감정표현규칙 몰입에 관한 연구: 감정표현규칙 몰입의선행변수와 결과변수" 한국인사관리학회 37 (37): 37-64, 2013

    8 공혜원, "감정조절전략이 조직시민행동에 미치는 차별적 효과: 직무소진의 매개효과를 중심으로" 한국인사관리학회 38 (38): 001-031, 2014

    9 박상언, "감정부조화와 감성지능이 서비스직 사원의 비과업행동에 미치는 영향" 한국경영학회 39 (39): 963-994, 2010

    10 임창희, "감정노동자의 이직의도에 미치는 유머와 유머선호도의 조절효과" 한국인사조직학회 17 (17): 1-36, 2009

    11 정무관, "감정노동의 결과에 관한 연구 - 콜센터 종사자를 대상으로 -" 한국서비스경영학회 9 (9): 319-345, 2008

    12 한진환, "감정노동과 조직시민행동간 조직지원의 조절효과" 한국인적자원관리학회 19 (19): 83-102, 2012

    13 장재규, "감정노동(Emotional labor)의 역동성에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2011

    14 Montgomery, A. J., "Workfamily interference, emotional labor and burnout" 21 (21): 36-51, 2006

    15 Sutton, R. I., "Untangling the Relationships Between Displayed Emotions and Organizational Sales : The Case of Convenience Stores" 31 (31): 461-487, 1988

    16 Diefendorff, J. M., "Understanding the emotional labor process : A control theory perspective" 24 (24): 945-959, 2003

    17 Pierce, J. L., "Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations" 26 (26): 298-310, 2001

    18 Pierce, J. L., "The state of psychological ownership : Integrating and extending a century of research" 7 (7): 84-107, 2003

    19 Barsade, S. G., "The ripple effect : Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior" 47 (47): 644-675, 2002

    20 Ilies, R., "The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intra individual patterns of citizenship behavior" 49 (49): 561-575, 2006

    21 Gross, J. J., "The emerging field of emotion regulation : An integrative review" 2 (2): 271-, 1998

    22 Diefendorff, J. M., "The dimensionality and antecedents of emotional labor strategies" 66 (66): 339-357, 2005

    23 Grandey, A. A., "The customer is not always right : Customer aggression and emotion regulation of service employees" 25 (25): 397-418, 2004

    24 Kiffin-Petersen, S. A., "The big five, emotional exhaustion and citizenship behaviors in service settings : The mediating role of emotional labor" 50 (50): 43-48, 2011

    25 Kiffin-Petersen, S. A., "The big five, emotional exhaustion and citizenship behaviors in service settings : The mediating role of emotional labor" 50 (50): 43-48, 2011

    26 Hochschild, A. R., "The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling" University of California Press 1983

    27 Brotheridge, C. M., "Testing a Conservation of Resources Model of the Dynamics of Emotional Labor" 7 (7): 57-67, 2002

    28 Moorman, R. H., "Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors : do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?" 76 (76): 845-855, 1991

    29 Giardini, A., "Reducing the negative effects of emotion work in service occupations : emotional competence as a psychological resource" 11 (11): 63-85, 2006

    30 Van Dyne, L., "Psychological ownership and feelings of possession : Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior" 25 (25): 439-459, 2004

    31 Vandewalle, D., "Psychological ownership : An empirical examination of its consequences" 20 (20): 210-226, 1995

    32 정양운, "Psychological Ownership and its Relationships with its Antecedents and Constructive Deviant Behavior" 한국인사조직학회 19 (19): 67-98, 2011

    33 Wilpert, B., "Property, ownership, and participation: on the growing contradictions between legal and psychological concepts" Oxford University Press 1991

    34 홍세희, "Program 2 구조방정식 모형의 중급방법" S & M 리서치 그룹 2013

    35 Belk, R. W., "Possessions and Self" John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 1988

    36 Furby, L., "Possession in humans : an exploratory study of its meaning and motivation" 6 (6): 49-65, 1978

    37 Frese, M., "Personal initiative: an active performance concept for work in the 21st century" 23 : 133-187, 2001

    38 Fisk, G. M., "Perceptions of leader emotion regulation and LMX as predictors of followers’ job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors" 23 (23): 1-12, 2012

    39 Organ, D. W., "Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome" Lexington books 1988

    40 MacCallum, R. C., "On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables" 7 (7): 19-60, 2002

    41 Hülsheger, U. R., "On the costs and benefits of emotional labor : a meta-analysis of three decades of research" 16 (16): 361-389, 2011

    42 Grandey, A. A., "Must service with a smile be stressful? The moderating role of personal control for American and French employees" 90 (90): 893-904, 2005

    43 Hair, J. F., "Multivariate Data Analysis" Prentice Hall 2006

    44 Kelly, J. R., "Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams" 86 (86): 99-130, 2001

    45 Salami, S. O., "Moderating effect of emotional intelligence on the relationship between emotional labour and organizational citizenship behavior" 5 (5): 142-150, 2007

    46 Sutton, R. I., "Maintaining norms about expressed emotions : The case of bill collectors" 36 (36): 245-268, 1991

    47 Rafaeli, A., "Expression of emotion as part of the work role" 12 (12): 23-37, 1987

    48 Mulaik, A. A., "Evaluation ofgoodness-of-fit Indices for structural equationmodeling" 105 (105): 430-445, 1989

    49 Beal, D. J., "Episodic processes in emotional labor: Perceptions of affective delivery and regulation strategies" 91 : 1053-1065, 2006

    50 Pierce, J. L., "Employee ownership : a conceptual model of process and effects" 16 : 121-144, 1991

    51 Bono, J. E., "Emotions in Organizational Behavior" Erlbaum 213-233, 2005

    52 Grandey, A., "Emotional labor in the 21st century: diverse perspectives on emotion regulation at work" Routledge 2013

    53 Ashforth, B. E., "Emotional labor in service roles : The influence of identity" 18 (18): 88-115, 1993

    54 Brotheridge, C. M., "Emotional labor and burnout : Comparing two perspectives of people work" 60 (60): 17-39, 2002

    55 Ramachandran, Y., "Emotional intelligence, emotional labour and organisational citizenship behaviour in service environments" 4 (4): 136-157, 2011

    56 Gosserand, R. H., "Emotional display rules and emotional labor : the moderating role of commitment" 90 (90): 1256-, 2005

    57 Grandey, A. A., "Emotion regulation in the workplace : A new way to conceptualize emotional labor" 5 (5): 95-110, 2000

    58 Goldberg, L. S., "Display rules versus display autonomy : emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and task performance in a call center simulation" 12 (12): 301-, 2007

    59 Diefendorff, J. M., "Are emotional display rules formal job requirements? Examination of employee and supervisor perceptions" 79 (79): 273-298, 2006

    60 Hennig-Thurau, T., "Are all smiles created equal? How emotional contagion and emotional labor affect service relationships" 70 (70): 58-73, 2006

    61 Spector, P. E., "An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior : Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior" 12 (12): 269-292, 2002

    62 배병렬, "Amos 19 구조방정식 모델링 원리와 실제" 청람 2013

    63 Cote, S., "A social interaction model of the effects of emotion regulation on work strain" 30 (30): 509-530, 2005

    64 Ping Jr, R. A., "A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables" 32 (32): 336-347, 1995

    65 Scott, B. A., "A multilevel field investigation of emotional labor, affect, work withdrawal, and gender" 54 (54): 116-136, 2011

    66 Organ, D. W., "A Meta-Analttic Review of Attitudinal and Dispositional of Organizational Citizenship Behavior" 48 (48): 775-802, 1995

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-02-26 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Association Of Personnel Administration -> Korean Academy of Organization and Management KCI등재
    2010-02-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인사관리연구 -> 조직과 인사관리연구
    외국어명 : The Korean Personnel Administration Journal -> Journal of Organization and Management
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.35 2.35 2.29
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.36 2.41 4.335 0.59
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼