RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    냉전연구의 문화적 지역적 전환 문제 = The Question of the Cultural and Regional Turn in Cold War Studies

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study focuses on the question of the cultural and spatial turn in Cold War Studies while comparing the achievements of New Cold War History Studies from the West and the newly rising Asian Cold War Studies. These could be classified as comparative socio-cultural historical orientation in Cold War Studies and cultural-political orientation in reconstruction of historical reality of Cold War Asia.
    The US-centered New Cold War History Studies either follows realist theories of International Relations or ends up at the question of national security and national interests even when it tries to understand the Cold War in terms of conflicts of thoughts, political system, and institutions. Although this approach can theorize the question of US-domination, it is unable to tackle the questions of the cultural construction of the dependent countries in systemization of the Cold War such as the overlapping questions of Americanization and Orientalism in construction of national states. The New Cold War Studies from Europe challenges the long-held concept of Cold War Studies as a policy-oriented discipline and advocates broadening of the scope of study to include locally based socio-cultural study of the subject, and building a relationship between Eastern and Western studies of the Cold War. However, it is still uninterested in postwar troubles of Asia produced by Europe’s violent redefinition of the continent in an attempt to re-live its past imperialist glories.
    Cold War Studies in Asia took off in the 21st century. It is no doubt an outcome of, alongside the rise of Asia as economic powers, the effort to construct postcolonial academic knowledge that challenges the hegemony of US-centered Regional Studies, its revisionist perspective, and absolute superiority in possession of historical records.
    It is a project to establish an independent and balanced perspective in search of Asia’s own voice. It was inevitable that Cold War Studies in Asia has been positioned outside the rigid academic disciplinarian classification and adopted the flexible form of Cultural Studies.
    Inter-Asia Cultural Studies Method, conceptualizing the Cold War as the principle of institutionalization and internalization/routinization in nationalization, enables Cold War Studies to reconstruct past and present of Cold War Asia rendering it visible the macro vision of building and institutionalization of ‘national states’ in Asian countries, and the micro vision of Cold War’s internalization at the levels of the conscious, the aesthetic, the everyday, and the cultural.
    Asian Cold War Studies constitutes the new trend of global regionalization of Cold War Studies, and at the heart of it is New Cold War History Studies from China. It is not surprising because China’s founding as a socialist state brought the Cold War to Asia, and her participation in Korean War became the practical beginning of the systemization of the Cold War. However, the Chinese New Cold War History Studies should step up to the stage in which it overlaps China-centered temporality with Cold War Asia’s multiple temporalities, and attempts to grasp the landscape of countless postcolonial, post-Cold War projects contest and articulate, and newly created and collapsing imaginaries of relationship from the perspective of ‘double marginality.’ Cold War Studies in Korea is at the starting point heralded by the establishment of the Korean Association for Cold War Studies in February 2015. It opened up new public sphere by raising various questions and presenting diverse positions on the Cold War which is, unlike Europe, still going on in Asia as showed in armistice in Korean peninsula and heightening military tensions and territorial disputes in the Asian pacific region. In cooperation with scholars and research units in Asia as well as other parts of the world, the association plans to archive data on the Asian experience of the Cold War, and Asian subjects’ struggle agai...
    번역하기

    This study focuses on the question of the cultural and spatial turn in Cold War Studies while comparing the achievements of New Cold War History Studies from the West and the newly rising Asian Cold War Studies. These could be classified as comparativ...

    This study focuses on the question of the cultural and spatial turn in Cold War Studies while comparing the achievements of New Cold War History Studies from the West and the newly rising Asian Cold War Studies. These could be classified as comparative socio-cultural historical orientation in Cold War Studies and cultural-political orientation in reconstruction of historical reality of Cold War Asia.
    The US-centered New Cold War History Studies either follows realist theories of International Relations or ends up at the question of national security and national interests even when it tries to understand the Cold War in terms of conflicts of thoughts, political system, and institutions. Although this approach can theorize the question of US-domination, it is unable to tackle the questions of the cultural construction of the dependent countries in systemization of the Cold War such as the overlapping questions of Americanization and Orientalism in construction of national states. The New Cold War Studies from Europe challenges the long-held concept of Cold War Studies as a policy-oriented discipline and advocates broadening of the scope of study to include locally based socio-cultural study of the subject, and building a relationship between Eastern and Western studies of the Cold War. However, it is still uninterested in postwar troubles of Asia produced by Europe’s violent redefinition of the continent in an attempt to re-live its past imperialist glories.
    Cold War Studies in Asia took off in the 21st century. It is no doubt an outcome of, alongside the rise of Asia as economic powers, the effort to construct postcolonial academic knowledge that challenges the hegemony of US-centered Regional Studies, its revisionist perspective, and absolute superiority in possession of historical records.
    It is a project to establish an independent and balanced perspective in search of Asia’s own voice. It was inevitable that Cold War Studies in Asia has been positioned outside the rigid academic disciplinarian classification and adopted the flexible form of Cultural Studies.
    Inter-Asia Cultural Studies Method, conceptualizing the Cold War as the principle of institutionalization and internalization/routinization in nationalization, enables Cold War Studies to reconstruct past and present of Cold War Asia rendering it visible the macro vision of building and institutionalization of ‘national states’ in Asian countries, and the micro vision of Cold War’s internalization at the levels of the conscious, the aesthetic, the everyday, and the cultural.
    Asian Cold War Studies constitutes the new trend of global regionalization of Cold War Studies, and at the heart of it is New Cold War History Studies from China. It is not surprising because China’s founding as a socialist state brought the Cold War to Asia, and her participation in Korean War became the practical beginning of the systemization of the Cold War. However, the Chinese New Cold War History Studies should step up to the stage in which it overlaps China-centered temporality with Cold War Asia’s multiple temporalities, and attempts to grasp the landscape of countless postcolonial, post-Cold War projects contest and articulate, and newly created and collapsing imaginaries of relationship from the perspective of ‘double marginality.’ Cold War Studies in Korea is at the starting point heralded by the establishment of the Korean Association for Cold War Studies in February 2015. It opened up new public sphere by raising various questions and presenting diverse positions on the Cold War which is, unlike Europe, still going on in Asia as showed in armistice in Korean peninsula and heightening military tensions and territorial disputes in the Asian pacific region. In cooperation with scholars and research units in Asia as well as other parts of the world, the association plans to archive data on the Asian experience of the Cold War, and Asian subjects’ struggle agai...

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 丸川哲史, "冷戰文化論 ― 竹内好と‘敵對’" 双風舎 2005

    2 "冷戰國際史硏究文庫" 九州出版社 2013

    3 이임하, "해방공간, 일상을 바꾼 여성들의 역사: 제도와 규정, 억압에 균열을 낸 여성들의 반란" 철수와영희 2015

    4 김태우, "폭격: 미공군의 공중폭격 기록으로 읽는 한국전쟁" 창비 2013

    5 김학재, "판문점 체제의 기원 : 한국전쟁과 자유주의 평화기획" 후마니타스 2015

    6 박인숙, "존 루이스 개디스(John Lewis Gaddis)의 ‘탈 수정주의(post-revisionism)적’ 냉전 해석에 대한 비판적 고찰-‘We Now Know’를 중심으로" 대구사학회 70 : 195-233, 2003

    7 백지운, "제국의 눈" 창비 2003

    8 Christian Marazzi, "자본과 언어 Capital and Language" 갈무리 2013

    9 이동기, "유럽 냉전의 개요" 22 : 2015

    10 合同通信社, "얄타秘密協定美國務省發表全文" 合同通信社 1956

    1 丸川哲史, "冷戰文化論 ― 竹内好と‘敵對’" 双風舎 2005

    2 "冷戰國際史硏究文庫" 九州出版社 2013

    3 이임하, "해방공간, 일상을 바꾼 여성들의 역사: 제도와 규정, 억압에 균열을 낸 여성들의 반란" 철수와영희 2015

    4 김태우, "폭격: 미공군의 공중폭격 기록으로 읽는 한국전쟁" 창비 2013

    5 김학재, "판문점 체제의 기원 : 한국전쟁과 자유주의 평화기획" 후마니타스 2015

    6 박인숙, "존 루이스 개디스(John Lewis Gaddis)의 ‘탈 수정주의(post-revisionism)적’ 냉전 해석에 대한 비판적 고찰-‘We Now Know’를 중심으로" 대구사학회 70 : 195-233, 2003

    7 백지운, "제국의 눈" 창비 2003

    8 Christian Marazzi, "자본과 언어 Capital and Language" 갈무리 2013

    9 이동기, "유럽 냉전의 개요" 22 : 2015

    10 合同通信社, "얄타秘密協定美國務省發表全文" 合同通信社 1956

    11 이병한, "신냉전사: 중국현대사의 새 영역 ― 비평과 전망 ―" 중국근현대사학회 (53) : 221-248, 2012

    12 이정우, "북조선 탄생" 서해문집 2006

    13 김정환, "민중문화운동의 실천론: 신식민지주의와 민중문화운동론" 도서출판 禾多 1984

    14 박인숙, "미국외교사와 ‘국제사' 문제" 11 : 2000

    15 기시 토시히코, "문화냉전과 아시아: 냉전연구를 탈중심화하기 文化冷戦の時代-アメリカとアジア-" 소명출판 2012

    16 요시미 순야, "냉전체제와 자본의 문화" 소명출판 2013

    17 백원담, "냉전아시아의 탄생: 신중국과 한국전쟁" 문화과학사 2013

    18 성공회대 동아시아연구소, "냉전아시아의 문화풍경Ⅱ" 현실문화연구 2009

    19 성공회대 동아시아연구소, "냉전아시아의 문화풍경Ⅰ" 현실문화연구 2008

    20 장세진, "냉전문화론" 너머북스 2010

    21 최영보, "냉전기원의 탈수정주의적 해석" 한국미국사학회 3 : 1995

    22 노엄 촘스키, "냉전과 대학" 당대 2001

    23 서울대 국제연구소, "글로벌 냉전의 지역적 특성" 22 : 2015

    24 鄧峰, "近十餘年朝鮮戰爭研究綜述" 09 : 2010

    25 羅小茗, "製造 ‘國民’: 1950-1970年代的日常生活與文藝實踐" 上海書店出版社 2011

    26 佐木秋夫, "苦惱するアジアの民族" 時事通信社 1973

    27 于群, "新冷戰史硏究: 美國的心理宣傳和情報戰" 上海三聯書店 2009

    28 沈志華, "冷战的再转型: 中苏同盟的内在分歧及其结局" 九州出版社 2013

    29 陳兼, "‘冷戰史新硏究’: 源起,學術特徵及其批判" 3 : 2003

    30 Bernhard, Nancy E, "U. S. Television News and Cold War Propaganda 1947-1960" 1999

    31 Fousek, John, "To Lead the Free World: American Nationalism and the Cultural Roots of the Cold War" University of North Carolina Press 2000

    32 Whitefield, Stephen J., "The Culture of the Cold War" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1996

    33 Griffith, Robert, "The Cultural Turn in Cold War Studies" 29 (29): 2001

    34 Saunders, Francis S., "The Cultural Cold War: the CIA and the World of Arts and Letters" The New Press 1999

    35 Armstrong, Charles K., "The Cultural Cold War in Korea, 1945-1950" 62 (62): 2003

    36 Westad, Odd Arne, "Reviewing the Cold War: Approaches, Interpretations, Theory" Frank Cass 2000

    37 丸川哲史, "Resionalism" 岩波書店 2003

    38 Lucas, Scott, "Freedom's War: The U. S. Crusade against the Soviet Union, 1945-1956" Manchester University Press 1999

    39 Mayhew, Christopher, "Foreword by the Lord Jenkins of Hillhead" I.B. Tauris 1998

    40 Major, Patrick, "East is East and West is West?: Towards a Comparative Socio-Cultural History of the Cold War" 4 (4): 2003

    41 Klein, Christina, "Cold War Orientalism: Asia in the Middlebrow Imagination, 1945-1961" University of California Press 2003

    42 Appy, Christian G., "Cold War Constructions: The Political Culture of United States Imperialism, 1945-1966" University of Massachusetts Press 2000

    43 Nicholson, Steve, "British Theatre and the Red Peril: The Portrayal of Communism 1917-1945" University of Exeter Press 1999

    44 Lashmar, Paul, "Britain's Secret Propaganda War: Foreign Office and the Cold War, 1948-77" Sutton Publishing Ltd. 1998

    45 Colomina, Beatriz, "Annmarie Brennan, and Jeannie Kim eds. Cold War Hothouses: Inventing Postwar Culture, from Cockpit to Playboy" Princeton Architectural Press 2004

    46 汪暉, "20세기 중국역사의 시각에서 본 아시아 평화" (여름) : 2014

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.44 0.44 0.36
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.37 0.34 0.589 0.43
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼