RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    알타이언어의 새로운 연구 방향에 대하여 = A New Direction of Research on Altaic Languages

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104071320

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Altaic languages (also called the Altaic language family from a different point of view) includes three language branches: Turkic, Mongolic, and Manchu-Tungusic. Until recently, the viewpoint of Altaic language research in Korea has been solely directed towards the genealogical study of the Korean language. That is, they have tried to work out the relationship between Korean and the Altaic languages through comparative study, with a speculation that the language from which Korean developed is in relation with the Altaic Languages. Although such research yielded achievements to some extent, the question of whether to classify Korean into Altaic remains unanswered. Besides, the research in which they suggest the possibility that the Altaic language family itself might not have existed, is rather gaining significant supports among scholars.
    In this study, we emphasize that we aim to conduct research on the Altaic languages from a new angle with the results of previous research at its foundation. We view dead languages or endangered ones with a small number of speakers as one aspect of the critical situation where humanity is losing its cultural diversity. Quite a number of the Altaic languages, particularly most of the Manchu-Tungusic branch are facing extinction. Linguistic societies around the world today are raising efforts to document endangered languages. Linguists in Korea, too, will have to be actively involved in fulfilling the task.
    We present here research direction for the future under the guidance of our fieldwork experience of two Manchu-Tungusic languages that have become vulnerable to loss. One of the findings is from Ewen, in which its word structure reflects a very interesting cultural background. Spoken Manchu as well provides a typical characteristics of endangered languages; it is observed as being significantly influenced by Chinese on its phonetic, and phonological grammar. Research on these Altaic languages is also a contribution to general linguistics, since the Altaic languages are virtually the least studied languages on earth.
    Korean linguists will have to put in all their effort to stop languages―the most valuable cultural property of mankind―from disappearing, by making records of languages that are falling out of use, and teaching those languages in order to save them from vanishment. In this way, we will achieve two goals at the same time. Namely, the first one is that we participate in the struggle of linguists around the world involved with the documentation of endangered languages. Secondly, we perform a service for future study, by documenting data of the most valuable languages that could shed light on the genealogy of the Korean language.
    번역하기

    The Altaic languages (also called the Altaic language family from a different point of view) includes three language branches: Turkic, Mongolic, and Manchu-Tungusic. Until recently, the viewpoint of Altaic language research in Korea has been solely di...

    The Altaic languages (also called the Altaic language family from a different point of view) includes three language branches: Turkic, Mongolic, and Manchu-Tungusic. Until recently, the viewpoint of Altaic language research in Korea has been solely directed towards the genealogical study of the Korean language. That is, they have tried to work out the relationship between Korean and the Altaic languages through comparative study, with a speculation that the language from which Korean developed is in relation with the Altaic Languages. Although such research yielded achievements to some extent, the question of whether to classify Korean into Altaic remains unanswered. Besides, the research in which they suggest the possibility that the Altaic language family itself might not have existed, is rather gaining significant supports among scholars.
    In this study, we emphasize that we aim to conduct research on the Altaic languages from a new angle with the results of previous research at its foundation. We view dead languages or endangered ones with a small number of speakers as one aspect of the critical situation where humanity is losing its cultural diversity. Quite a number of the Altaic languages, particularly most of the Manchu-Tungusic branch are facing extinction. Linguistic societies around the world today are raising efforts to document endangered languages. Linguists in Korea, too, will have to be actively involved in fulfilling the task.
    We present here research direction for the future under the guidance of our fieldwork experience of two Manchu-Tungusic languages that have become vulnerable to loss. One of the findings is from Ewen, in which its word structure reflects a very interesting cultural background. Spoken Manchu as well provides a typical characteristics of endangered languages; it is observed as being significantly influenced by Chinese on its phonetic, and phonological grammar. Research on these Altaic languages is also a contribution to general linguistics, since the Altaic languages are virtually the least studied languages on earth.
    Korean linguists will have to put in all their effort to stop languages―the most valuable cultural property of mankind―from disappearing, by making records of languages that are falling out of use, and teaching those languages in order to save them from vanishment. In this way, we will achieve two goals at the same time. Namely, the first one is that we participate in the struggle of linguists around the world involved with the documentation of endangered languages. Secondly, we perform a service for future study, by documenting data of the most valuable languages that could shed light on the genealogy of the Korean language.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김주원, "한국의 알타이언어 음성,영상 자료" 한국언어학회 (43) : 119-141, 2005

    2 이기문, "한국어와 몽고어의 관계 , 제19회 동양학 학술회의.성균관대학교 대동문화연구소"

    3 성백인, "한국어 계통 연구의 현상과 과제 , 한국 민족의 기원과 형성(하)" 소화 371-466, 1996

    4 김주원, "알타이제어와 한국어의 전설고모음화 현상" 한국알타이학회 (9) : 233-247, 1999

    5 김주원, "알타이언어 디지털 아카이브 구축" 서울대학교 2008

    6 김주원, "사라져 가는 알타이언어를 찾아서" 태학사 2008

    7 김호동, "부족지(라시드 앗 딘의 집사 1)" 사계절 2002

    8 김주원, "국역 조선왕조실록에 나타난 번역어 “오랑캐”에 대하여" 57-66, 2006

    9 김방한, "국어의 계통 연구에 관하여―그 방법론적 반성" 서울대학교 동아문화연구소 (8) : 249-275, 1968

    10 김주원, "계통론 , 국어학 연구 백년사 Ⅱ―의미론,국어사" 일조각 541-549, 1992

    1 김주원, "한국의 알타이언어 음성,영상 자료" 한국언어학회 (43) : 119-141, 2005

    2 이기문, "한국어와 몽고어의 관계 , 제19회 동양학 학술회의.성균관대학교 대동문화연구소"

    3 성백인, "한국어 계통 연구의 현상과 과제 , 한국 민족의 기원과 형성(하)" 소화 371-466, 1996

    4 김주원, "알타이제어와 한국어의 전설고모음화 현상" 한국알타이학회 (9) : 233-247, 1999

    5 김주원, "알타이언어 디지털 아카이브 구축" 서울대학교 2008

    6 김주원, "사라져 가는 알타이언어를 찾아서" 태학사 2008

    7 김호동, "부족지(라시드 앗 딘의 집사 1)" 사계절 2002

    8 김주원, "국역 조선왕조실록에 나타난 번역어 “오랑캐”에 대하여" 57-66, 2006

    9 김방한, "국어의 계통 연구에 관하여―그 방법론적 반성" 서울대학교 동아문화연구소 (8) : 249-275, 1968

    10 김주원, "계통론 , 국어학 연구 백년사 Ⅱ―의미론,국어사" 일조각 541-549, 1992

    11 Poppe N., "Studies in Korean Etymology In : Memoires de la Societe Finno-Ougrienne XC V, Helsinki" 13 (13): 568-581, 1950

    12 Poppe,N., "Introduction to Altaic Linguistics" Otto Harrassowitz 1965

    13 Wittenburg,P.P.Trilsbeek, "DOBES:Documenting Endangered Languages for Current and Future Generations,Workshop for Endangered Languages,CIL18,Seoul.pp.133~135"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.84 0.84 0.77
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.87 0.83 1.332 0.3
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼