RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      혈우병 고항체 반응군 환자에 대한 Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (aPCC) 유지요법 = Maintenance Therapy with Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (aPCC) for Hemophilia Patients with High Levels of Responding Inhibitors

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104609859

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Eleven percent of severe hemophilia A patients and 5% of severe hemophilia B patients may develop inhibitors. We have conducted aPCC-based maintenance therapy for hemophilia patients with high levels of responding inhibitors and we analyzed the efficacy, safety, the factor consumption and the expense of this treatment, as compared to on-demand therapy.
      Methods: Eleven hemophilia patients with high levels of responding inhibitors were eligible for the study. We tried to evaluate the longitudinal bleeding episodes, the inhibitor titers, the X-ray findings, the adverse events and the factor consumption between on-demand therapy and maintenance therapy. The bypassing agent in this study was aPCC having a longer half-life. The dosage was 30∼50 U/kg, 3 times a week.
      Results: The mean follow-up period was 6.8 months for on-demand therapy and 10.6 months for maintenance therapy. The mean dosage of aPCC was 45.2 U/kg. The episodes of hemarthrosis decreased by 61.4% (P=0.003) and other significant bleedings decreased by 45.2% (P=0.109). The inhibitor titers decreased in 7 patients and these increased in 4 patients, but anamnesis took place in only 1 patient. Radiologically, 2 patients improved, 1 patient got worse and 7 patients were stable. Neither adverse signs nor symptoms were noticed. The mean factor consumption changed from 55.8×103 U for aPCC and 48.6 mg for rFVIIa on-demand therapy to 216×103 U for aPCC and 4.8 mg rFVIIa for maintenance therapy. Maintenance therapy cost 67% more than on-demand therapy monthly (P=0.041).
      Conclusion: aPCC-based maintenance therapy for hemophilia patients with high responding inhibitors cost 67% more than on-demand therapy, but it reduced by 61.4% the episodes of hemarthrosis and 45.2% of the other significant bleedings. aPCC-based maintenance therapy can very effectively reduce the bleeding episodes of hemophilia patients with high levels of responding inhibitors.
      번역하기

      Background: Eleven percent of severe hemophilia A patients and 5% of severe hemophilia B patients may develop inhibitors. We have conducted aPCC-based maintenance therapy for hemophilia patients with high levels of responding inhibitors and we analyze...

      Background: Eleven percent of severe hemophilia A patients and 5% of severe hemophilia B patients may develop inhibitors. We have conducted aPCC-based maintenance therapy for hemophilia patients with high levels of responding inhibitors and we analyzed the efficacy, safety, the factor consumption and the expense of this treatment, as compared to on-demand therapy.
      Methods: Eleven hemophilia patients with high levels of responding inhibitors were eligible for the study. We tried to evaluate the longitudinal bleeding episodes, the inhibitor titers, the X-ray findings, the adverse events and the factor consumption between on-demand therapy and maintenance therapy. The bypassing agent in this study was aPCC having a longer half-life. The dosage was 30∼50 U/kg, 3 times a week.
      Results: The mean follow-up period was 6.8 months for on-demand therapy and 10.6 months for maintenance therapy. The mean dosage of aPCC was 45.2 U/kg. The episodes of hemarthrosis decreased by 61.4% (P=0.003) and other significant bleedings decreased by 45.2% (P=0.109). The inhibitor titers decreased in 7 patients and these increased in 4 patients, but anamnesis took place in only 1 patient. Radiologically, 2 patients improved, 1 patient got worse and 7 patients were stable. Neither adverse signs nor symptoms were noticed. The mean factor consumption changed from 55.8×103 U for aPCC and 48.6 mg for rFVIIa on-demand therapy to 216×103 U for aPCC and 4.8 mg rFVIIa for maintenance therapy. Maintenance therapy cost 67% more than on-demand therapy monthly (P=0.041).
      Conclusion: aPCC-based maintenance therapy for hemophilia patients with high responding inhibitors cost 67% more than on-demand therapy, but it reduced by 61.4% the episodes of hemarthrosis and 45.2% of the other significant bleedings. aPCC-based maintenance therapy can very effectively reduce the bleeding episodes of hemophilia patients with high levels of responding inhibitors.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Leissinger CA, "Use of prothrombin complex concentrates and activated prothrombin complex concentrates as prophylactic therapy in haemophilia patients with inhibitors" 5 (5): 25-32, 1999

      2 김대현, "Thromboelastography를 이용한 혈액응고 기능 평가에 측정 시간과 혈액의 온도가 미치는 영향" 대한마취과학회 42 (42): 306-311, 2002

      3 Morfini M, "The design and analysis of half-life and recovery studies for factor VIII and factor IX. Factor VIII/Factor IX scientific and standardization committee of the international society for thrombosis and haemostasis" 66 : 384-386, 1991

      4 Valentino LA, "The benefits of prophylactic treatment with APCC in patients with haemophilia and high-titre inhibitors: a retrospective case series" 15 : 733-742, 2009

      5 Konkle BA, "Randomized, prospective clinical trial of recombinant factor VIIa for secondary prophylaxis on hemophilia patients with inhibitors" 5 : 1904-1913, 2007

      6 Leissinger CA, "Prophylactic treatment with activated prothrombin complex concentrate (FEIBA) reduces the frequency of bleeding episodes in paediatric patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors" 13 : 249-255, 2007

      7 Siegmund B, "Prophylactic treatment with FEIBA of a haemophilia A patient with inhibitor: what are the costs, what are the benefits?" 11 : 638-641, 2005

      8 Morfini M, "Prophylactic treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors: clinical experience with recombinant factor VIIa in European Hemophilia Centres" 13 : 502-507, 2007

      9 Villar A, "Pharmacokinetics of activated recombinant coagulation factor VII (NovoSeven) in children vs. adults with haemophilia A" 10 : 352-359, 2004

      10 Negrier C, "Multicenter retrospective study on the utilization of FEIBA in France in patients with factor VIII and factor IX inhibitors. French FEIBA Study Group. in: Factor Eight Bypassing Activity" 77 : 1113-1119, 1997

      1 Leissinger CA, "Use of prothrombin complex concentrates and activated prothrombin complex concentrates as prophylactic therapy in haemophilia patients with inhibitors" 5 (5): 25-32, 1999

      2 김대현, "Thromboelastography를 이용한 혈액응고 기능 평가에 측정 시간과 혈액의 온도가 미치는 영향" 대한마취과학회 42 (42): 306-311, 2002

      3 Morfini M, "The design and analysis of half-life and recovery studies for factor VIII and factor IX. Factor VIII/Factor IX scientific and standardization committee of the international society for thrombosis and haemostasis" 66 : 384-386, 1991

      4 Valentino LA, "The benefits of prophylactic treatment with APCC in patients with haemophilia and high-titre inhibitors: a retrospective case series" 15 : 733-742, 2009

      5 Konkle BA, "Randomized, prospective clinical trial of recombinant factor VIIa for secondary prophylaxis on hemophilia patients with inhibitors" 5 : 1904-1913, 2007

      6 Leissinger CA, "Prophylactic treatment with activated prothrombin complex concentrate (FEIBA) reduces the frequency of bleeding episodes in paediatric patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors" 13 : 249-255, 2007

      7 Siegmund B, "Prophylactic treatment with FEIBA of a haemophilia A patient with inhibitor: what are the costs, what are the benefits?" 11 : 638-641, 2005

      8 Morfini M, "Prophylactic treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors: clinical experience with recombinant factor VIIa in European Hemophilia Centres" 13 : 502-507, 2007

      9 Villar A, "Pharmacokinetics of activated recombinant coagulation factor VII (NovoSeven) in children vs. adults with haemophilia A" 10 : 352-359, 2004

      10 Negrier C, "Multicenter retrospective study on the utilization of FEIBA in France in patients with factor VIII and factor IX inhibitors. French FEIBA Study Group. in: Factor Eight Bypassing Activity" 77 : 1113-1119, 1997

      11 Váradi K, "Monitoring the bioavailability of FEIBA with a thrombin generation assay" 1 : 2374-2380, 2003

      12 Hilgartner MW, "Long-term FEIBA prophylaxis does not prevent progression of existing joint disease" 9 : 261-268, 2003

      13 Arnold WD, "Hemophilic arthroapthy. in: Current concepts of pathogenesis and management" 59 : 287-305, 1977

      14 Barrowcliffe TW, "Factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity: a suggested mechanism of action" 21 : 181-186, 1981

      15 Luu H, "FEIBA safety profile in multiple modes of clinical and home-therapy application" 10 (10): 10-16, 2004

      16 Cheng S, "FEIBA prophylaxis in hemophila A patients with inhibitors decreases bleeding episodes, improves joint function and enhance quality of life" 12 (12): 371-, 2006

      17 Jimenez-Yuste V, "Experiences in the prevention of arthropathy in haemophilia patients with inhibitors" 14 (14): 28-65, 2008

      18 Ewenstein B, "Evaluation of FEIBA for prophylaxis in patients with inhibitors" 10 (10): 10-, 2004

      19 Lambert T, "Can long-term prophylaxis with APCC improve the bleeding rate and quality of life of frequently bleeding haemophiliacs with inhibitors?" 12 (12): 399-, 2006

      20 Yoshioka A, "Anamnestic response following infusion of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) and activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors" 2 (2): 51-58, 1991

      21 Ewing NP, "Anamnesis inpatients with hemophilia and inhibitors who receive activated prothrombin complex concentrates for prophylaxis" 5 (5): 158-, 2007

      22 Dimichele D, "A retrospective postlicensure survey of FEIBA efficacy and safety" 12 : 352-362, 2006

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한혈액학회지 -> Blood Research
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Hematology -> Blood Research
      KCI등재
      2012-02-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-04-06 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Journal of Hematology KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.08 0.08 0.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.12 0.339 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼