RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    1636년 통신사 관련 기록의 서사 전략 비교 — 디지털 병렬 분석 시스템의 고안과 활용 — = Narrative Strategies in Records of the 1636 Tongsinsa: A digital parallel analysis of Korean and Japanese accounts

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109988938

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines the political and strategic nature of early modern diplomatic records through a digital, date-aligned parallel analysis of Korean and Japanese accounts of the 1636 Tongsinsa mission (Joseon diplomatic mission to Japan; Chosen Tsushinshi) The corpus comprises the Korean records—Byeongja Ilbon Ilgi (Im Gwang), Haesarok (Kim Se-ryeom), and Dongsarok (Hwang Ho)—and the Tsushima-domain record Kan’ei Heishi Shinshi Kiroku.
    This study addresses two chronic limitations in prior scholarship: (1) a disciplinary divide in which Korean and Japanese historians have relied primarily on domestic sources; and (2) technical barriers to day-by-day comparison across the five-month co-travel segment of the mission (Oct. 1636–Feb. 1637). To mitigate these issues, a digital system was implemented that aligns entries by date, normalizes personal and place names, and toggles originals/translations, enabling systematic, qualitative comparison.
    Analysis identifies four recurrent narrative strategies across the sources: (1) inversion of power relations; (2) redefinition of actional meanings; (3) shifts in agency; and (4) selective recording and omission. These strategies did not remain confined to their moment but later shaped memory and policy. The Geumjeolha (金絶河) incident was progressively reframed as a symbol of Joseon’s moral superiority, while the Nikko (日光) visit shifted from a “voluntary request” to “coercion,” becoming one rationale for ending such visits in 1682. Taken together, the cases indicate a cyclical dynamic in which narrative, memory, and policy interact.
    Through close comparisons, this study argues that diplomatic records are better understood as arenas of contested meaning rather than neutral transcripts. The digital, date-aligned workflow complements philological methods and can be extended to cognate source sets, including mission diaries of other Tongsinsa and of Yeonhaengsa (Joseon envoys to Beijing).
    번역하기

    This study examines the political and strategic nature of early modern diplomatic records through a digital, date-aligned parallel analysis of Korean and Japanese accounts of the 1636 Tongsinsa mission (Joseon diplomatic mission to Japan; Chosen Tsush...

    This study examines the political and strategic nature of early modern diplomatic records through a digital, date-aligned parallel analysis of Korean and Japanese accounts of the 1636 Tongsinsa mission (Joseon diplomatic mission to Japan; Chosen Tsushinshi) The corpus comprises the Korean records—Byeongja Ilbon Ilgi (Im Gwang), Haesarok (Kim Se-ryeom), and Dongsarok (Hwang Ho)—and the Tsushima-domain record Kan’ei Heishi Shinshi Kiroku.
    This study addresses two chronic limitations in prior scholarship: (1) a disciplinary divide in which Korean and Japanese historians have relied primarily on domestic sources; and (2) technical barriers to day-by-day comparison across the five-month co-travel segment of the mission (Oct. 1636–Feb. 1637). To mitigate these issues, a digital system was implemented that aligns entries by date, normalizes personal and place names, and toggles originals/translations, enabling systematic, qualitative comparison.
    Analysis identifies four recurrent narrative strategies across the sources: (1) inversion of power relations; (2) redefinition of actional meanings; (3) shifts in agency; and (4) selective recording and omission. These strategies did not remain confined to their moment but later shaped memory and policy. The Geumjeolha (金絶河) incident was progressively reframed as a symbol of Joseon’s moral superiority, while the Nikko (日光) visit shifted from a “voluntary request” to “coercion,” becoming one rationale for ending such visits in 1682. Taken together, the cases indicate a cyclical dynamic in which narrative, memory, and policy interact.
    Through close comparisons, this study argues that diplomatic records are better understood as arenas of contested meaning rather than neutral transcripts. The digital, date-aligned workflow complements philological methods and can be extended to cognate source sets, including mission diaries of other Tongsinsa and of Yeonhaengsa (Joseon envoys to Beijing).

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼