본 연구의 주요 목적은 브랜드퍼스낼러티가 휴먼퍼스낼러티에 의해서 어떻게 반응하는지에 대한 것이다. 그리고 두 개념이 유사할수록 소비자의 브랜드에 대한 평가와 선호도에 어떠한 영...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
본 연구의 주요 목적은 브랜드퍼스낼러티가 휴먼퍼스낼러티에 의해서 어떻게 반응하는지에 대한 것이다. 그리고 두 개념이 유사할수록 소비자의 브랜드에 대한 평가와 선호도에 어떠한 영...
본 연구의 주요 목적은 브랜드퍼스낼러티가 휴먼퍼스낼러티에 의해서 어떻게 반응하는지에 대한 것이다. 그리고 두 개념이 유사할수록 소비자의 브랜드에 대한 평가와 선호도에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지에 대하여 심도 있게 파악하고자 함에 있었다.
브랜드퍼스낼러티와 휴먼퍼스낼러티의 일치성이 소비자의 브랜드선호도에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 알아보기 위해 가설을 제시하고 실증분석을 실시하였다. 특히 휴먼퍼스낼러티는 DI척도를 이용하여 분류하였다. DI척도를 이용하여 세 가지 컬러 차원의 휴먼퍼스낼러티와 세 가지 제품군에 대하여 각기 다른 브랜드 다섯 가지를 설정하였다. 이를 통하여 15개의 브랜드와 3개의 컬러 차원과 5개의 브랜드 퍼스낼러티 차원을 교차시켜서 가설검증을 실시하였다.
분석결과, 세 가지 가설만 부분적으로 채택되었다. 브랜드퍼스낼러티 차원인 Sincerity는 DI척도 중 Blue타입과 대체적으로 부정적인 관계를 보이고, Red타입과 Green타입은 대체적으로 긍정적 관계를 보이고 있었다. 특히 편의점 브랜드인 GS25에서 Green타입은 더 두드러지는 결과를 볼 수 있었다. 즉, GS25에서 Green타입점수가 높고 Sincerity점수가 높을수록, 브랜드선호도도 높아지는 것을 볼 수 있었다. 또 다른 브랜드퍼스낼리티 차원인 Excitement와 Sophistication차원은 Blue, Red, Green타입에서 전반적으로 부정적인 관계를 보이고 있었다. 그리고 Ruggedness차원은 Green타입에 긍정적이며 특히 GS25에서 Green은 Ruggedness와 현저한 긍정적 인과관계가 나타났다.
더 나아가 특정한 브랜드퍼스낼러티가 어떤 특정 브랜드와 유의한 브랜드선호도를 보이고 있는지에 대하여 12개의 가설을 설정해서 검증하였다. 분석결과, Buy the way와 Hanssem은 Excitement차원을 보강할수록 브랜드선호도를 높일 수 있고, Mini stop은 Competence차원을, North face는 Sincerity와 Ruggedness차원을, Kolon sport는 Sincerity와 Excitement차원을, 그리고 Casamia는 Sincerity와 Sophistication차원을 보강할수록 브랜드선호도가 향상될 수 있다는 점을 알 수 있었다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The purpose of this paper is to identify the relations between brand and human personality by jointing brand preferences of consumers with different personality types of specific brand. Hypotheses were tested through statistical analysis of survey dat...
The purpose of this paper is to identify the relations between brand and human personality by jointing brand preferences of consumers with different personality types of specific brand. Hypotheses were tested through statistical analysis of survey data collected in three stages. It was proven that consumers prefer brands with personalities that agree to their own image concept. For example, subject with Green DI type exhibit higher preference to the sincerity dimension of brand GS25, whereas consumers of Red and Blue DI type exhibit negative response to the same dimension of brand personality. No clear findings emerged concerning 3 DI types, however, Blue DI type showed a negative effect in convenience store, Red DI type did a positive response in same brand. In this paper we revealed what any brand personality give most influence to specific brand brand category
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Bower, B., "When stones come to life: researchers ponder the curious human tendency to view all sorts of things as alive" 155 : 360-362, 1999
2 Boyer, P., "What makes anthropomorphism natural? Intuitive ontology and cultural representations" 2 : 83-97, 1996
3 Johar, J.S, "Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: when and why to use which appeal" 20 : 23-33, 1991
4 Ericksen, M.K, "Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase intention: a European perspective" 6 (6): 41-56, 1996
5 Graeff, T.R, "Using promotional messages to manage the effects of brand and self-image on brand evaluations" 13 (13): 4-18, 1996
6 Norman, W, "Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attribute: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality types" 66 : 574-583, 1963
7 Eysenck, H.J., "The structure of human personality" Methuen 1970
8 Low, G.S, "The effect of double deals on consumer attitudes" 69 (69): 453-466, 1993
9 Dawar, N, "The Signaling Impact of Low Introductory Price on Perceived Quality and Trial" 8 : 251-259, 1997
10 Gedenk, k, "The Role of Retail Promotion in Determining Future Brand Loyalty: Its Effect on Purchase Event Feedback" 75 (75): 433-459, 1999
1 Bower, B., "When stones come to life: researchers ponder the curious human tendency to view all sorts of things as alive" 155 : 360-362, 1999
2 Boyer, P., "What makes anthropomorphism natural? Intuitive ontology and cultural representations" 2 : 83-97, 1996
3 Johar, J.S, "Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: when and why to use which appeal" 20 : 23-33, 1991
4 Ericksen, M.K, "Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase intention: a European perspective" 6 (6): 41-56, 1996
5 Graeff, T.R, "Using promotional messages to manage the effects of brand and self-image on brand evaluations" 13 (13): 4-18, 1996
6 Norman, W, "Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attribute: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality types" 66 : 574-583, 1963
7 Eysenck, H.J., "The structure of human personality" Methuen 1970
8 Low, G.S, "The effect of double deals on consumer attitudes" 69 (69): 453-466, 1993
9 Dawar, N, "The Signaling Impact of Low Introductory Price on Perceived Quality and Trial" 8 : 251-259, 1997
10 Gedenk, k, "The Role of Retail Promotion in Determining Future Brand Loyalty: Its Effect on Purchase Event Feedback" 75 (75): 433-459, 1999
11 Solomon, M.R, "The Role of Products in Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionism Perspective" 10 : 319-329, 1983
12 Kopalle, P., "The Dynamic effect of Discounting on Sales: Empirical Analysis and Normative Pricing Implications" 18 (18): 317-332, 1999
13 Siguaw, J.A., "The Brand-personality Scale" 40 (40): 48-55, 1999
14 Ekelund, B.Z, "The Application of a Model which Integrates Market Segmentation and Psychological Theories to Change Energy Consumption in Households" Henley Management College. Brunel University 1997
15 Margerison, C, "Team Management: Practical New Approaches" Management Books 2000. Ltd 1996
16 Levy, S.J, "Symbols for Sales" 37 (37): 117-124, 1959
17 Bhat, S., "Symbolic and functional positioning of brands" 15 (15): 32-43, 1998
18 Leigh, J.H, "Symbolic Interactionism: Its Effects on Consumer Behaviour and Implications for Marketing Strategy" 6 (6): 5-16, 1992
19 Sirgy, M.J., "Self-congruity versus Functional Predictors of Consumer Behaviour" 19 : 363-375, 1991
20 Zinkham, G.M, "Self-concept and Advertising Effectiveness: A Conceptual Model of Congruency, Conspicuousness, and Response Mode, In Advances in Consumer Research" Association for Consumer Research. Provo. UT 348-, 1991
21 Sutherland, J., "Real, ideal, and undesired self concepts and their effects on viewer preferences: who do you love" 2004
22 Jung, C.G, "Psychological Types" Princeton University Press 1971
23 Davis, S.J., "Promotion has a Negative Effect on Brand Evaluations-Or Does It? Additional Disconfirming Evidence" 29 : 143-148, 1992
24 Belk, R.W., "Possessions and the extended self" 15 : 139-168, 1988
25 Burke, B, "Position, personality, not price, should frame consumer messages" 35 : 36-65, 1994
26 Carver, C.S, "Perspectives on Personality" Pearson Education Inc 2004
27 Langvik, E., "Personality traits and team roles: introducing a tricolour model of team roles and its relationship to personality traits in the Five Factor model" 2006
28 Engler, B., "Personality Theories: An Introduction" Houghton Mifflin Company 1995
29 Ogilvy, D, "Ogilvy on Advertising" Vintage Books 1983
30 Wallendorf, M, "My Favourite Things: A Cross Cultural Inquiry into Object Attachment, Possessiveness, and Social Linkage" 14 : 531-547, 1988
31 Vitz, P.C, "Masculinity of Smokers and the Masculinity of Cigarette Images" 49 : 155-159, 1965
32 Briggs, I.M, "Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator" Consulting Psychologists Press Inc 1985
33 Belbin, M.R., "Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail" Butterworth-Heinmann 1999
34 Holt, D.B, "How consumers consume: a typology of consumption practices" 22 : 1-15, 1995
35 Plummer, J.T, "How Personality Makes a Difference" 40 (40): 79-84, 2000
36 Pervin, L.A, "Handbook of personality, theory and research(2nd ed.)" Guilford Press 1999
37 Elliott, R, "Existential consumption and irrational desire" 31 : 285-296, 1997
38 Okazaki, S, "Excitement or sophistication? A preliminary exploration of online brand personality" 23 (23): 279-303, 2006
39 Scott, C.A, "Effects of Trial and Incentives on Repeat Purchase Behavior" 13 : 263-269, 1976
40 Kahn, B.E, "Effects of Retraction of Price Promotions on Brand Choice Behavior for Variety-Seeking and Last Purchase-Loyal Consumers" 27 : 279-289, 1990
41 Shank, M.D, "Does personality influence brand image" 128 : 157-164, 1994
42 Srinivasan, S., "Do Promotions Benefit Manufacturers, Retailers, or Both" 50 : 617-629, 2004
43 Aaker, J.L., "Dimensions of brand personality" 34 : 347-356, 1997
44 Belk, R.W, "Developmental recognition of consumption symbolism" 10 : 4-17, 1982
45 Mick, D.G, "Consumer Research and Semiotics: Exploring the Morphology of Signs, Symbols, and Significance" 13 (13): 196-213, 1986
46 Dolich, I.J, "Congruence relationships between self-images and product brands" 6 : 80-84, 1969
47 Phau, I, "Brand personality and consumer self-expression: single or dual carriageway" 8 : 428-444, 2001
48 Belbin, M.R, "Beyond the Team" Butterworth-Heinmann 2000
49 Tybout, A.M, "Availability of Well-Defined Internal Knowledge and the Attitude Formation Process: Information Aggregation Versus Self-Perception" 44 (44): 474-491, 1983
50 Sirgy, M.J., "Assessing the Predictive Validity of Two Methods of Measuring Self-image Congruence" 25 (25): 229-241, 1997
51 Miller, J.G, "A cultural perspective on the morality of beneficence and interpersonal responsibility, In International and intercultural communication annual" Sage 11-23, 1991
스마트폰의 지각된 기능적 속성과 개인 혁신성이 사용자의 채택의도와 실제사용도에 미치는 영향
계속사업손익과 중단사업손익의 분리공시가 가치관련성에 미치는 영향
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-24 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 경영교육논총 -> 경영교육연구 | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.34 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.3 | 1.28 | 1.351 | 0.59 |