RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      No difference in factual or conceptual recall comprehension for tablet, laptop, and handwritten note-taking by medical students in the United States: a survey-based observational study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108190648

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: Technological advances are changing how students approach learning. The traditional note-taking methods of longhandwriting have been supplemented and replaced by tablets, smartphones, and laptop note-taking. It has been theorized that writing...

      Purpose: Technological advances are changing how students approach learning. The traditional note-taking methods of longhandwriting have been supplemented and replaced by tablets, smartphones, and laptop note-taking. It has been theorized that writing notesby hand requires more complex cognitive processes and may lead to better retention. However, few studies have investigated the use oftablet-based note-taking, which allows the incorporation of typing, drawing, highlights, and media. We therefore sought to confirm thehypothesis that tablet-based note-taking would lead to equivalent or better recall as compared to written note-taking.
      Methods: We allocated 68 students into longhand, laptop, or tablet note-taking groups, and they watched and took notes on a presentation on which they were assessed for factual and conceptual recall. A second short distractor video was shown, followed by a 30-minuteassessment at the University of California, Irvine campus, over a single day period in August 2018. Notes were analyzed for content,supplemental drawings, and other media sources.
      Results: No significant difference was found in the factual or conceptual recall scores for tablet, laptop, and handwritten note-taking(P=0.61). The median word count was 131.5 for tablets, 121.0 for handwriting, and 297.0 for laptops (P=0.01). The tablet group hadthe highest presence of drawing, highlighting, and other media/tools.
      Conclusion: In light of conflicting research regarding the best note-taking method, our study showed that longhand note-taking is notsuperior to tablet or laptop note-taking. This suggests students should be encouraged to pick the note-taking method that appeals mostto them. In the future, traditional note-taking may be replaced or supplemented with digital technologies that provide similar efficacywith more convenience

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Bui DC, "The role of working memory abilities in lecture note-taking" 33 : 12-22, 2014

      2 Mueller PA, "The pen is mightier than the keyboard : advantages of longhand over laptop note taking" 25 : 1159-1168, 2014

      3 Rosciano A, "The effectiveness of mind mapping as an active learning strategy among associate degree nursing students" 10 : 93-99, 2015

      4 Wammes JD, "The drawing effect: Evidence for reliable and robust memory benefits in free recall" 69 : 1752-1776, 2016

      5 Mueller PA, "Technology and note-taking in the classroom, boardroom, hospital room, and courtroom" 5 : 139-145, 2016

      6 van der Meer AL, "Only three fingers write, but the whole brain works : a high-density EEG study showing advantages of drawing over typing for learning" 8 : 706-, 2017

      7 Stacy EM, "Note-taking and handouts in the digital age" 79 : 107-, 2015

      8 Luo L, "Laptop versus longhand note taking : effects on lecture notes and achievement" 46 : 947-971, 2018

      9 Sana F, "Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers" 62 : 24-31, 2013

      10 Mangen A, "Handwriting versus keyboard writing : effect on word recall" 7 : 227-247, 2015

      1 Bui DC, "The role of working memory abilities in lecture note-taking" 33 : 12-22, 2014

      2 Mueller PA, "The pen is mightier than the keyboard : advantages of longhand over laptop note taking" 25 : 1159-1168, 2014

      3 Rosciano A, "The effectiveness of mind mapping as an active learning strategy among associate degree nursing students" 10 : 93-99, 2015

      4 Wammes JD, "The drawing effect: Evidence for reliable and robust memory benefits in free recall" 69 : 1752-1776, 2016

      5 Mueller PA, "Technology and note-taking in the classroom, boardroom, hospital room, and courtroom" 5 : 139-145, 2016

      6 van der Meer AL, "Only three fingers write, but the whole brain works : a high-density EEG study showing advantages of drawing over typing for learning" 8 : 706-, 2017

      7 Stacy EM, "Note-taking and handouts in the digital age" 79 : 107-, 2015

      8 Luo L, "Laptop versus longhand note taking : effects on lecture notes and achievement" 46 : 947-971, 2018

      9 Sana F, "Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers" 62 : 24-31, 2013

      10 Mangen A, "Handwriting versus keyboard writing : effect on word recall" 7 : 227-247, 2015

      11 Bennett J, "Handbook of research on mobile devices and smart gadgets in K-12 education" IGI Global 194-224, 2018

      12 Kay R, "Exploring the benefits and challenges of using laptop computers in higher education classrooms : a formative analysis" 37 : 2011

      13 Dahlstrom E, "ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology" 2013

      14 Piolat A, "Cognitive effort during note taking" 19 : 291-312, 2005

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2019-04-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (기타) KCI등재
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼