RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    방송통신위원회 심결절차 개선에 관한 연구 = 시정조치 및 과징금 부과 절차를 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76540690

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Korea Communications Commission(hereinafter the "KCC") was established for the effective regulation of Korean communications industry in 2008. The effective regulation of communications industry is very important because it is one of the essential industries and is closely related to our daily lives. Its mission is accomplished through the hearing procedures by five commissioners including the chairman of KCC.
    The hearing procedures of KCC have improved a lot in terms of fairness and efficiency since the establishment. However, there are several problems to improve compared to U.S. Federal Communications Commission(hereinafter the "FCC") or Korean Fair Trade Commission(hereinafter the "KFTC"). First of all, KCC should strengthen quasi-judicial procedures for a fair hearing. Many scholars think that the combination of the prosecutorial function and the adjudicatory function is inescapable. However, KCC should make an effort to complement the problems of the system.
    The particular form of the communications authorities in each country depends on the historical backgrounds and political environment. However, the trends in the developed countries are to separate the internal functions and to strengthen the defense rights for respondents. KFTC has also developed its hearing procedures persistently and is evaluated to have established adversarial system.
    The FCC examples for a fair hearing are the hearing by Administrative Law Judges(hereinafter the "ALJ") and the ban on the ex parte communication. Of course, we should take the our circumstances into consideration prior to introducing the ALJ system or the ban on the ex parte communication. I think that the point is to share the problems of the KCC hearing procedures and discuss the ways to improve them actively.
    번역하기

    Korea Communications Commission(hereinafter the "KCC") was established for the effective regulation of Korean communications industry in 2008. The effective regulation of communications industry is very important because it is one of the essential ind...

    Korea Communications Commission(hereinafter the "KCC") was established for the effective regulation of Korean communications industry in 2008. The effective regulation of communications industry is very important because it is one of the essential industries and is closely related to our daily lives. Its mission is accomplished through the hearing procedures by five commissioners including the chairman of KCC.
    The hearing procedures of KCC have improved a lot in terms of fairness and efficiency since the establishment. However, there are several problems to improve compared to U.S. Federal Communications Commission(hereinafter the "FCC") or Korean Fair Trade Commission(hereinafter the "KFTC"). First of all, KCC should strengthen quasi-judicial procedures for a fair hearing. Many scholars think that the combination of the prosecutorial function and the adjudicatory function is inescapable. However, KCC should make an effort to complement the problems of the system.
    The particular form of the communications authorities in each country depends on the historical backgrounds and political environment. However, the trends in the developed countries are to separate the internal functions and to strengthen the defense rights for respondents. KFTC has also developed its hearing procedures persistently and is evaluated to have established adversarial system.
    The FCC examples for a fair hearing are the hearing by Administrative Law Judges(hereinafter the "ALJ") and the ban on the ex parte communication. Of course, we should take the our circumstances into consideration prior to introducing the ALJ system or the ban on the ex parte communication. I think that the point is to share the problems of the KCC hearing procedures and discuss the ways to improve them actively.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서언
    • Ⅱ. 방송통신위원회 심결절차 일반론
    • Ⅲ. 방송통신위원회 심결절차의 문제점
    • Ⅳ. 방송통신위원회 심결절차의 개선방안
    • Ⅴ. 결어
    • Ⅰ. 서언
    • Ⅱ. 방송통신위원회 심결절차 일반론
    • Ⅲ. 방송통신위원회 심결절차의 문제점
    • Ⅳ. 방송통신위원회 심결절차의 개선방안
    • Ⅴ. 결어
    • 참고문헌
    • 〈Abstract〉
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김남진, "행정법 I" 법문사 2005

    2 김동희, "행정법 I" 박영사 2009

    3 이상직, "통신위원회를 중심으로 본 전기통신사업법론" 진한도서 1998

    4 정호경, "통신위원회 재정(裁定)의 법적 성격과 불복방법" 법학연구소 24 (24): 2007

    5 이원우, "통신시장에 대한 공법적 규제의 구조와 문제점" 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) 11 : 61-96, 2004

    6 이희정, "통신규제법 집행과정의 비교연구" 법학연구소 24 (24): 185-212, 2007

    1 김남진, "행정법 I" 법문사 2005

    2 김동희, "행정법 I" 박영사 2009

    3 이상직, "통신위원회를 중심으로 본 전기통신사업법론" 진한도서 1998

    4 정호경, "통신위원회 재정(裁定)의 법적 성격과 불복방법" 법학연구소 24 (24): 2007

    5 이원우, "통신시장에 대한 공법적 규제의 구조와 문제점" 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) 11 : 61-96, 2004

    6 이희정, "통신규제법 집행과정의 비교연구" 법학연구소 24 (24): 185-212, 2007

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-11-20 학회명변경 한글명 : 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) -> 행정법이론실무학회
    영문명 : Korea Administrative Law And Practice Association(약칭 Kalpa) -> Korea Administrative Law And Practice Association(약칭 KALPA)
    KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 행정법연구(行政法硏究) -> 행정법연구 KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.61 1.61 1.39
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.31 1.37 1.384 0.57
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼