RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      근대세계의 폭력성에 대하여: 멜빌의 『모비 딕』과 매카시의 『피의 자오선』 = On the Violence of the Modern World: A Comparative Study of Melville`s Moby Dick and McCarthy`s Blood Meridian

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82758971

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study examines the problems of violence underlying the American modernity, comparing Cormac McCarthy`s Blood Meridian with Herman Melville`s Moby-Dick. Violence deriving from racism, inscribed at the beginning of America, seems to have decreased gradually as democracy has advanced. It should be noticed, however, how the visible violence involving killing native Americans and making slaves of the black people has been transformed through modernization into the invisible violence embedded in the modern capitalist system. Moby-Dick and Blood Meridian explore double-faced violence in America and the structural forces behind it by selecting such historical facts as whale-hunting or scalp-hunting as their main subjects. Both of the novels focus on the dark side of violence through drawing the theme of madness into the center of their narratives as well as using complex narrative modes. Though sharing much in common, these novels have their own distinctive ways of approaching violence. Moby-Dick reveals, through the curious madness of Ahab, subtle but iron-willed impulses of violence inherent in the modern system to destroy the vital mysterious forces of life, whereas Blood Meridian presents scenes of American nightmares where white people get obsessed with killing others, violating the ideal of democracy and civilization, thereby debunking the myth of the West and the ideology of imperial expansionism. In relation with the problems of violence, both the concepts and descriptions of nature (seascapes or landscapes) also play major role in these two novels since a whole consciousness of Ishmael or a new perception called optical democracy to appreciate nature is seen to operate here as the only possible capacity of resisting the mad violence of Ahab or Holden.
      번역하기

      This study examines the problems of violence underlying the American modernity, comparing Cormac McCarthy`s Blood Meridian with Herman Melville`s Moby-Dick. Violence deriving from racism, inscribed at the beginning of America, seems to have decreased ...

      This study examines the problems of violence underlying the American modernity, comparing Cormac McCarthy`s Blood Meridian with Herman Melville`s Moby-Dick. Violence deriving from racism, inscribed at the beginning of America, seems to have decreased gradually as democracy has advanced. It should be noticed, however, how the visible violence involving killing native Americans and making slaves of the black people has been transformed through modernization into the invisible violence embedded in the modern capitalist system. Moby-Dick and Blood Meridian explore double-faced violence in America and the structural forces behind it by selecting such historical facts as whale-hunting or scalp-hunting as their main subjects. Both of the novels focus on the dark side of violence through drawing the theme of madness into the center of their narratives as well as using complex narrative modes. Though sharing much in common, these novels have their own distinctive ways of approaching violence. Moby-Dick reveals, through the curious madness of Ahab, subtle but iron-willed impulses of violence inherent in the modern system to destroy the vital mysterious forces of life, whereas Blood Meridian presents scenes of American nightmares where white people get obsessed with killing others, violating the ideal of democracy and civilization, thereby debunking the myth of the West and the ideology of imperial expansionism. In relation with the problems of violence, both the concepts and descriptions of nature (seascapes or landscapes) also play major role in these two novels since a whole consciousness of Ishmael or a new perception called optical democracy to appreciate nature is seen to operate here as the only possible capacity of resisting the mad violence of Ahab or Holden.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Cormac McCarthy, "핏빛 자오선" 민음사 2008

      2 이현우, "폭력이란 무엇인가" 난장이 23-24, 2011

      3 한기욱, "추상적 인간과 자연: 미국 고전문학의 근대성에 대하여" (2) : 1997

      4 한기욱, "미국 민주주의와 ‘제국’: 멜빌 문학의 현재성" 영미문학연구회 14 : 8-32, 2003

      5 John Emil Sepich, "‘What Kind of Indians was them?’: Some Historical Sources in Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian, in Perspectives on Cormac McCarthy" UP of Mississippi 1993

      6 Andrew Delbanco, "The Real American Dream: A Meditation on Hope" Harvard UP 56-, 1999

      7 George Guillemin, "The Pastoral Vision of Cormac McCarthy" Texas A&M UP 3-, 2004

      8 David Holloway, "The Late Modernism of Cormac McCarthy" Greenwood P 2002

      9 Immanuel Wallerstein, "The Decline of American Power" Norton 2003

      10 Vereen M. Bell, "The Achievement of Cormac McCarthy" Louisiana State UP 12-, 1988

      1 Cormac McCarthy, "핏빛 자오선" 민음사 2008

      2 이현우, "폭력이란 무엇인가" 난장이 23-24, 2011

      3 한기욱, "추상적 인간과 자연: 미국 고전문학의 근대성에 대하여" (2) : 1997

      4 한기욱, "미국 민주주의와 ‘제국’: 멜빌 문학의 현재성" 영미문학연구회 14 : 8-32, 2003

      5 John Emil Sepich, "‘What Kind of Indians was them?’: Some Historical Sources in Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian, in Perspectives on Cormac McCarthy" UP of Mississippi 1993

      6 Andrew Delbanco, "The Real American Dream: A Meditation on Hope" Harvard UP 56-, 1999

      7 George Guillemin, "The Pastoral Vision of Cormac McCarthy" Texas A&M UP 3-, 2004

      8 David Holloway, "The Late Modernism of Cormac McCarthy" Greenwood P 2002

      9 Immanuel Wallerstein, "The Decline of American Power" Norton 2003

      10 Vereen M. Bell, "The Achievement of Cormac McCarthy" Louisiana State UP 12-, 1988

      11 Richard Slotkin, "Regeneration of Violence: the Mythology of the American Frontier, 1600~1860" Wesleyan UP 1973

      12 James D. Lilley, "Of Whale and Man: The Dynamics of Cormac McCarthy’s Environmental Imagination, in The Greening of Literary Scholarship: Literature, Theory, and the Environment" U of Iowa P 152-, 2002

      13 Sepick, "Notes on Blood Meridian" U of Texas P 3-, 2008

      14 Herman Melville, "Moby-Dick or The Whale" Northwestern UP 186-, 1988

      15 Harold Bloom, "How To Read and Why" Touchstone Book 254-255, 2001

      16 Dana Philips, "History and the Ugly Facts of Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian" 68 (68): 1996

      17 Sara L. Spurgeon, "Foundation of Empire: The Sacred Hunter and the Eucharist of the Wilderness in Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian, in Cormac McCarthy: Bloom’s Modern Critical Views" Chelsea House 2009

      18 Barcley Owens, "Cormac McCarthy’s Western Novels" U of Arizona P 2000

      19 John Cant, "Cormac McCarthy and the Myth of American Exceptionalism" Routledge 159-, 2008

      20 Charles Olson, "Call Me Ishmael" Grove P Inc 16-25, 1947

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보2차)
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.64 0.64 0.63
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.52 0.45 1.421 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼