RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    음주운전에 의한 복수 운전면허취소처분 판례의 문제점과 관련법제의 개선방안 - 대법원 2018.2.28.선고 2017두67476 판결을 중심으로 - = A Problem about a Precedent of the Multiple Driver's License Cancellation Caused by Drunk Driving, and an Improvement of Related Legislation

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The current Road Traffic Act and all the related legislations are integrally managing a driver's license through giving the driver's license qualification with limiting to a corresponding driver who acquired the certain qualification, and through issuing multiple driver's license in case of having each individual requirement. Also, an administrative restriction such as disqualifying driving is being provided in case of violating safety precaution obligation that a driver will need to abide by such as drunk driving.
    A vehicle driving of the day has a close relationship with a means of living beyond a tool of pursuing the convenience of life. But people's recognition of safety precaution obligation on vehicle driving is relatively lacking unlike this rise in vehicles. Especially in terms of drunk driving, it was social atmosphere to think of generosity as a virtue with treating it just as a mistake that anybody can make at one time or another. However, due to a social issue according to drunk driving of growing continuously and to a rise in economic loss costs that the whole society needs to bear, the drunk driving resulted in a social issue of needing to be jointly confronted together, not a personal problem of being likely needed to be allowed any more.
    As if this social atmosphere is reflected, the Supreme Court ruled the contents as saying that the multiple driver's license revocation is not illegal and undue, through positively reflecting the generally preventive aspect on drunk driving recently through the Feb. 28, 2018 sentence-2017du67276 Judgment. As for drunk driving, this judgment is the one enough to be welcomed when considering from the aspect of being necessary for preventive measures such as stepping up a restriction for eradicating the drunk driving because our country has a weaker sanction against drunk driving compared to foreign countries. On the other hand, in that the similar case in the past and the revocation range of multiple driver's license caused by drunk driving brought about a different outcome, it is a precedent whose validity will need to be examined.
    Accordingly, this study analyzes its difference and problem through a method of comparatively considering the existing position relevant to the cancellation of multiple driver's license caused by drunk driving, and the recent judgement of the Supreme Court, and seeks an improvement plan for all the regulations such as the Road Traffic Act and the enforcement rules, which are the related legislations, in order to prevent unnecessary confusion and to secure effectiveness of the administrative act in which frontline public officials of taking an administrative measure carry out duty based on this. Hence, the aim is to arrange the criteria for the unified administrative restriction and for the exercise of discretionary powers in administrative agency.
    번역하기

    The current Road Traffic Act and all the related legislations are integrally managing a driver's license through giving the driver's license qualification with limiting to a corresponding driver who acquired the certain qualification, and through issu...

    The current Road Traffic Act and all the related legislations are integrally managing a driver's license through giving the driver's license qualification with limiting to a corresponding driver who acquired the certain qualification, and through issuing multiple driver's license in case of having each individual requirement. Also, an administrative restriction such as disqualifying driving is being provided in case of violating safety precaution obligation that a driver will need to abide by such as drunk driving.
    A vehicle driving of the day has a close relationship with a means of living beyond a tool of pursuing the convenience of life. But people's recognition of safety precaution obligation on vehicle driving is relatively lacking unlike this rise in vehicles. Especially in terms of drunk driving, it was social atmosphere to think of generosity as a virtue with treating it just as a mistake that anybody can make at one time or another. However, due to a social issue according to drunk driving of growing continuously and to a rise in economic loss costs that the whole society needs to bear, the drunk driving resulted in a social issue of needing to be jointly confronted together, not a personal problem of being likely needed to be allowed any more.
    As if this social atmosphere is reflected, the Supreme Court ruled the contents as saying that the multiple driver's license revocation is not illegal and undue, through positively reflecting the generally preventive aspect on drunk driving recently through the Feb. 28, 2018 sentence-2017du67276 Judgment. As for drunk driving, this judgment is the one enough to be welcomed when considering from the aspect of being necessary for preventive measures such as stepping up a restriction for eradicating the drunk driving because our country has a weaker sanction against drunk driving compared to foreign countries. On the other hand, in that the similar case in the past and the revocation range of multiple driver's license caused by drunk driving brought about a different outcome, it is a precedent whose validity will need to be examined.
    Accordingly, this study analyzes its difference and problem through a method of comparatively considering the existing position relevant to the cancellation of multiple driver's license caused by drunk driving, and the recent judgement of the Supreme Court, and seeks an improvement plan for all the regulations such as the Road Traffic Act and the enforcement rules, which are the related legislations, in order to prevent unnecessary confusion and to secure effectiveness of the administrative act in which frontline public officials of taking an administrative measure carry out duty based on this. Hence, the aim is to arrange the criteria for the unified administrative restriction and for the exercise of discretionary powers in administrative agency.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김해룡, "행정재량론고 ― 행정재량 인식 관련 판례에 대한 비판적 고찰 ―" 한국공법학회 40 (40): 191-221, 2012

    2 윤영선, "행정소송과 재량준칙: 제재적 처분의 재량준칙에 관한 판례의 논리" 한국공법학회 28 (28): 1999

    3 김재협, "행정사건 처리에 있어서 도움이 될 몇가지 문제점"

    4 노기현, "행정법상 재량행위에 대한 사법심사기준의 변천에 관한 연구- 일본의 학설과 판례의 논의를 중심으로 -" 한국비교공법학회 14 (14): 293-318, 2013

    5 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 박영사 2017

    6 정형근, "행정법" 피앤씨미디어 2018

    7 김원중, "한국과 미국의 운전면허 행정처분 비교 검토" 미국헌법학회 24 (24): 75-104, 2013

    8 이상천, "재량의 ‘과정론적 통제론’" 법학연구소 23 (23): 183-226, 2010

    9 김승조, "음주운전의 법적처리 -행정처분 및 행정구제와 관련하여-" 한국보호관찰학회 (2) : 2002

    10 장영택, "음주운전 단속기준 강화 필요성 및 효율적 단속개선방안" 2016

    1 김해룡, "행정재량론고 ― 행정재량 인식 관련 판례에 대한 비판적 고찰 ―" 한국공법학회 40 (40): 191-221, 2012

    2 윤영선, "행정소송과 재량준칙: 제재적 처분의 재량준칙에 관한 판례의 논리" 한국공법학회 28 (28): 1999

    3 김재협, "행정사건 처리에 있어서 도움이 될 몇가지 문제점"

    4 노기현, "행정법상 재량행위에 대한 사법심사기준의 변천에 관한 연구- 일본의 학설과 판례의 논의를 중심으로 -" 한국비교공법학회 14 (14): 293-318, 2013

    5 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 박영사 2017

    6 정형근, "행정법" 피앤씨미디어 2018

    7 김원중, "한국과 미국의 운전면허 행정처분 비교 검토" 미국헌법학회 24 (24): 75-104, 2013

    8 이상천, "재량의 ‘과정론적 통제론’" 법학연구소 23 (23): 183-226, 2010

    9 김승조, "음주운전의 법적처리 -행정처분 및 행정구제와 관련하여-" 한국보호관찰학회 (2) : 2002

    10 장영택, "음주운전 단속기준 강화 필요성 및 효율적 단속개선방안" 2016

    11 국회교통안전포럼, "음주운전 교통사고 현주소와 앞으로 나아갈 길" 2016

    12 명묘희, "음주운전 관련 입법개선방향 및 연구방향에 대하여, In 음주운전단속과 처벌기준에 관한 입법평가" 한국법제연구원 2010

    13 정광정, "운전면허행정처분 기준의 법적 성질에 관한 연구" 한국법학회 (26) : 47-68, 2007

    14 강현호, "운전면허취소처분의 법적 성질과 재량준칙" 고시계사 61 (61): 2016

    15 김용섭, "운전면허취소·정치처분의 법적 성질 및 그 한계" 서울대학교출판부 4 : 1999

    16 김재광, "운전면허 행정처분의 기준과 절차의 문제점과 개선방안" 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) (29) : 177-199, 2011

    17 홍정선, "신행정법특강" 박영사 2018

    18 오승연, "상습적 음주운전 교통사고 감소방안" KIRI보험연구원 2017

    19 정초영, "복수면허에 대한 운전면허 행정처분의 효력범위에 대한 연구" 경찰대학 10 (10): 131-156, 2010

    20 홍성필, "복수면허소지자의 주취운전에 대한 면허취소·정지" 손해보험협회 2003

    21 경찰청, "범죄통계[범죄발생 및 검거현황(전국)], KOSIS 통계표"

    22 황의관, "미국 연방행정절차법상 정책의 일반적 설명과 재량준칙의 비교법 연구" 한국토지공법학회 68 : 431-466, 2015

    23 YTN 사이언스 통, "도로의 시한폭탄, 음주운전"

    24 "https://www.koroad.or.kr/kp_web/drunkDriveInfo2.do"

    25 "http://www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?tabMenuId=tab18&query=%EC%9A%B4%EC%A0%84%EB%A9%B4%ED%97%88#AJAX"

    26 "http://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/search/elawsSearch/elaws_search/lsg0100/search?searchType=2&searchL awName=%E9%81%93%E8%B7%AF%E4%BA%A4%E9%80%9A%E6%B3%95&abbreviationFl g=true"

    27 "http://dl.koroad.or.kr/PAGE_license/view.jsp?code=100730"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-10-27 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of hongik law review KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.59 0.59 0.61
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.6 0.59 0.693 0.42
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼