RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    자유주의 국가의 중립성과 시민교육 = The Neutrality of the Liberal State and Civic Education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3192136

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    We now live in the era of pluralism. Pluralism is neither the persisitent fundamentalism which admits only one conception of the good, nor the simple relativism which insists that all things are the matters of individual choice. Pluralism admits different values and pursues the consensus through the reasonable discussion. In order to build a stable and well-ordered society which respects individuals` liberties and rights as far as possible, we should not adhere to one particular conception of the good. But neither should we take an anarchist view. It would be a logical fallacy, that is to say `is-ought-fallacy`, that we should pursue pluralism only because we live in the era of pluralism. Pluralism respects the autonomy of the individuals and the groups, and for that reason it is worthy to be pursued. While liberals focus on liberty, right, and autonomy of individual, communitarians emphasize the value of the community. And while liberals support civic education in hopes of equipping students to become autonomous individuals, capable of choosing their own ends and pursuing them effectively, communitarians support civic education in hopes of equipping students to become good citizens, capable of contributing meaningfully to public deliberations and pursuits. But both recognize that civic education can contribute to the democratic citizenship and reflective forms of life. In that sense, they are not so much different each other as they appear. And we may say that the very distinction between anti-perfectionist liberalism and perfectionist liberalism threatens to break down. Much the same observation holds for the distinction between the political liberalism and the comprehensive liberalism. So, we need a conception that pursues the liberties of individuals and accepts some communitarian elements. We may call it communitarian liberalism. The civic education based on the communitarian liberalism can help the students to acquire such virtues as mutual trust, tolerance, sense of justice and solidarity.
    번역하기

    We now live in the era of pluralism. Pluralism is neither the persisitent fundamentalism which admits only one conception of the good, nor the simple relativism which insists that all things are the matters of individual choice. Pluralism admits diffe...

    We now live in the era of pluralism. Pluralism is neither the persisitent fundamentalism which admits only one conception of the good, nor the simple relativism which insists that all things are the matters of individual choice. Pluralism admits different values and pursues the consensus through the reasonable discussion. In order to build a stable and well-ordered society which respects individuals` liberties and rights as far as possible, we should not adhere to one particular conception of the good. But neither should we take an anarchist view. It would be a logical fallacy, that is to say `is-ought-fallacy`, that we should pursue pluralism only because we live in the era of pluralism. Pluralism respects the autonomy of the individuals and the groups, and for that reason it is worthy to be pursued. While liberals focus on liberty, right, and autonomy of individual, communitarians emphasize the value of the community. And while liberals support civic education in hopes of equipping students to become autonomous individuals, capable of choosing their own ends and pursuing them effectively, communitarians support civic education in hopes of equipping students to become good citizens, capable of contributing meaningfully to public deliberations and pursuits. But both recognize that civic education can contribute to the democratic citizenship and reflective forms of life. In that sense, they are not so much different each other as they appear. And we may say that the very distinction between anti-perfectionist liberalism and perfectionist liberalism threatens to break down. Much the same observation holds for the distinction between the political liberalism and the comprehensive liberalism. So, we need a conception that pursues the liberties of individuals and accepts some communitarian elements. We may call it communitarian liberalism. The civic education based on the communitarian liberalism can help the students to acquire such virtues as mutual trust, tolerance, sense of justice and solidarity.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼