RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      욕망과 욕동 = Desire and Drive: A Study on the Practice of the Lacanian Theory

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82585767

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This essay is an attempt to draw attention to the Lacanian dictum that “desire comes from the Other, and jouissance is on the side of das Ding.” Put otherwise, categorically speaking, drive belongs to the real, while desire, to the symbolic. Many ...

      This essay is an attempt to draw attention to the Lacanian dictum that “desire comes from the Other, and jouissance is on the side of das Ding.” Put otherwise, categorically speaking, drive belongs to the real, while desire, to the symbolic. Many unnecessarily complicated problems are derived from a misunderstanding
      of this apparently simple, but essentially elaborate distinction, a categorical distinction. To begin with, it notes the way in which Freudian theory of drive has undergone vicissitudes, starting from the dualistic sexual drive and ego drive, interchangeably called self-preservative drive, and reaching another dualism, life drive (Eros) and death drive (Thanatos). In his words, “The aim of [Eros] is to establish even greater unities and to preserve them thus ―in short, to bind together; the aim of [Thanatos] is, on the contrary, to undo connections and so to destroy things.” Meanwhile, the theory of desire is approached from the Lacanian maxim that “man's desire is the Other's desire,” which is in line with Alexander Kojeve's concept of anthropogentic desire mediated by the desire of the Other, as distinguished from an animal desire, which is immediate and object-oriented. As a phenomenon happening in the symbolic order, desire has to do with a dialectical and metonymical displacement on the word-to-word basis. Viewed from the analytic standpoint, “castration means that jouissance mustbe refused, so that it can be reached on the inverted ladder of the Law of desire.” This means a transformation of drive into desire. This is made possible by the famous Lacanian objet a that mediates between the incompatible domains of desire and jouissance, for it is the object-cause of desire and around it does the drive circulate. To desire is a kind of compromise formation, a metonymic displacement, a defense against intractable drive, an encounter with which is usually experienced as overwhelming, excessive, and even abhorred. Thus, one of the goals of analysis is to get the analysand to “stop giving up on his desire,” to untie the knots in his desire, and to constitute a ‘decided’ or ‘determined’ desire.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼