RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    식품안전성에 대한 소비자의 가치평가 - 이론적 접근방법 및 측정방법 고찰 = Consumer valuation of food safety / A review of theoretical approaches and methodologies

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104354681

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purposes of this study were to discuss why consumer valuation of food safety should be introduced and to review what kinds of theoretical approaches and analytical methods would be effective to estimate consumer value of food safety. Since consumers might perceive risk associated with food safety, the expected utility model introducing risk perception into the model was discussed. In addition, this study explained pre-valuation for reducing degree of perceived risk, the model of self-protection action and the value of information as an important factor for explaining risk perception and self-protection action. Furthermore, analytical models to support the expected utility model were discussed: 1) willingness-to-pay method which could explain consumer demand effectively related with consumer preference considering risks perception (contingent valuation, experimental auction, hedonic method and conjoint method): 2) cost-of-illness method which could estimate the value of food safety through measuring cost for food-related illnesses: 3) finally, discrete choice model which could forecast consumer decision-making behavior and derive consumer welfare with confronting decision-making problems and choosing one of discrete choices associated with risk. Thus, this study intended to provide basic information for further studies with discussing valuation method to explain consumer perception of food safety. Especially, this study might be useful for consumer-related research organization, R & D in the food industry and government which would need effective analytical tools for raising the level of food safety and establishing desirable food policies through investigating consumer preference.
    번역하기

    The purposes of this study were to discuss why consumer valuation of food safety should be introduced and to review what kinds of theoretical approaches and analytical methods would be effective to estimate consumer value of food safety. Since consume...

    The purposes of this study were to discuss why consumer valuation of food safety should be introduced and to review what kinds of theoretical approaches and analytical methods would be effective to estimate consumer value of food safety. Since consumers might perceive risk associated with food safety, the expected utility model introducing risk perception into the model was discussed. In addition, this study explained pre-valuation for reducing degree of perceived risk, the model of self-protection action and the value of information as an important factor for explaining risk perception and self-protection action. Furthermore, analytical models to support the expected utility model were discussed: 1) willingness-to-pay method which could explain consumer demand effectively related with consumer preference considering risks perception (contingent valuation, experimental auction, hedonic method and conjoint method): 2) cost-of-illness method which could estimate the value of food safety through measuring cost for food-related illnesses: 3) finally, discrete choice model which could forecast consumer decision-making behavior and derive consumer welfare with confronting decision-making problems and choosing one of discrete choices associated with risk. Thus, this study intended to provide basic information for further studies with discussing valuation method to explain consumer perception of food safety. Especially, this study might be useful for consumer-related research organization, R & D in the food industry and government which would need effective analytical tools for raising the level of food safety and establishing desirable food policies through investigating consumer preference.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
    더보기
    해외이동버튼