RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      유럽의 “위험 제로(zero risk)접근 방식”에 기반한 데이터 국외 이전 규범에 대한 비판적 검토 = A Critical Review of Data Cross-border Transfer Norms Based on Europe’s “Zero Risk Approach”

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109295130

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Following the Schrems II decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union(CJEU) invalidating the EU-US Privacy Shield, EU data supervisory authorities (DPAs) have developed a “zero risk approach” to the international transfer of personal data under Chapter 5 of the GDPR. This means that companies processing European personal data must eliminate all theoretical risk that foreign governments will be able to access European data. This “zero risk approach” also includes strong data localization. However, it is questionable whether this “zero risk approach” is security-friendly and effective. First of all, European data controllers are often subject to US personal jurisdiction and may face overseas data access (production) requests in the same way as US companies. In addition, foreign intelligence agencies do not necessarily access data through compulsory requests to companies, but rather through direct access by domestic technical means. Even if European data processors avoid being subject to foreign personal jurisdictions such as the United States, they may be at increased risk of being “directly accessed” by foreign intelligence agencies. Therefore, the “zero risk” requirement that Europe demands of CSPs can be seen as pursuing something that is ultimately unattainable. Furthermore, the GDPR is fundamentally based on a “risk-based approach,” which means “an attempt to strike the optimal balance between ultimately conflicting constitutional interests.” Therefore, safeguards for the international transfer of personal data should be evaluated according to the standard of “proportionality,” not “perfection.”
      번역하기

      Following the Schrems II decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union(CJEU) invalidating the EU-US Privacy Shield, EU data supervisory authorities (DPAs) have developed a “zero risk approach” to the international transfer of personal dat...

      Following the Schrems II decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union(CJEU) invalidating the EU-US Privacy Shield, EU data supervisory authorities (DPAs) have developed a “zero risk approach” to the international transfer of personal data under Chapter 5 of the GDPR. This means that companies processing European personal data must eliminate all theoretical risk that foreign governments will be able to access European data. This “zero risk approach” also includes strong data localization. However, it is questionable whether this “zero risk approach” is security-friendly and effective. First of all, European data controllers are often subject to US personal jurisdiction and may face overseas data access (production) requests in the same way as US companies. In addition, foreign intelligence agencies do not necessarily access data through compulsory requests to companies, but rather through direct access by domestic technical means. Even if European data processors avoid being subject to foreign personal jurisdictions such as the United States, they may be at increased risk of being “directly accessed” by foreign intelligence agencies. Therefore, the “zero risk” requirement that Europe demands of CSPs can be seen as pursuing something that is ultimately unattainable. Furthermore, the GDPR is fundamentally based on a “risk-based approach,” which means “an attempt to strike the optimal balance between ultimately conflicting constitutional interests.” Therefore, safeguards for the international transfer of personal data should be evaluated according to the standard of “proportionality,” not “perfection.”

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김현수, "소비자보호와 정보주체의 권리 실현 집행체계- 미국 FTC의 사례를 중심으로 -" 2024

      2 박선욱, "미국과 EU의 개인정보보호에 관한 법제 비교분석" (83) : 2019

      3 김현경, "데이터 속성과 국지화 규범의 법적 쟁점에 대한 고찰" 78 : 2017

      4 김민호, "개인정보의 의미" 28 (28): 2016

      5 김현경, "‘데이터 주권’과 ‘개인정보 국외이전’ 규범 합리화 방안 연구" 31 (31): 2019

      6 CIPL, "White Paper - A Path Forward for International Data Transfers under the GDPR after the CJEU Schrems II Decision"

      7 Lokke Moerel, "What happened to the Risk Based Approach to Data Transfers? How the EDPB is rewriting the GDPR"

      8 "The White Book: USA v. Microsoft: What Impact, CEIS & The Chertoff Group White Paper"

      9 Clifford Chance, "The GDPR International Data Transfer Regime: the case for Proportionality and a Risk-Based Approach"

      10 Giovanni De Gregorio, "The European Risk-Based Approaches: Connecting Constitutional Dots in the Digital Age" 59 (59): 2022

      1 김현수, "소비자보호와 정보주체의 권리 실현 집행체계- 미국 FTC의 사례를 중심으로 -" 2024

      2 박선욱, "미국과 EU의 개인정보보호에 관한 법제 비교분석" (83) : 2019

      3 김현경, "데이터 속성과 국지화 규범의 법적 쟁점에 대한 고찰" 78 : 2017

      4 김민호, "개인정보의 의미" 28 (28): 2016

      5 김현경, "‘데이터 주권’과 ‘개인정보 국외이전’ 규범 합리화 방안 연구" 31 (31): 2019

      6 CIPL, "White Paper - A Path Forward for International Data Transfers under the GDPR after the CJEU Schrems II Decision"

      7 Lokke Moerel, "What happened to the Risk Based Approach to Data Transfers? How the EDPB is rewriting the GDPR"

      8 "The White Book: USA v. Microsoft: What Impact, CEIS & The Chertoff Group White Paper"

      9 Clifford Chance, "The GDPR International Data Transfer Regime: the case for Proportionality and a Risk-Based Approach"

      10 Giovanni De Gregorio, "The European Risk-Based Approaches: Connecting Constitutional Dots in the Digital Age" 59 (59): 2022

      11 Peter Swire, "The Effects of Data Localization on Cybersecurity - Organizational Effects" Georgia Tech Scheller College of Business 2023

      12 Matthias Bauer, "The Economic Impacts of the Proposed EUCS Exclusionary Requirements: Estimates for EU Member States" ECIPE Study 2023

      13 Theodore Christakis, "The 'Zero Risk' Fallacy: International Data Transfers, Foreign Governments’ Access to Data and the Need for a Risk-Based Approach, CIPL/CBDF Paper Series"

      14 TikTok, "Setting a new standard in European data security with Project Clover"

      15 Christopher Kuner, "Schrems II Re-Examined"

      16 Swire, Peter, "Risks to Cybersecurity from Data Localization, Organized by Techniques, Tactics, and Procedures"

      17 EDPB, "Recommendations 02/2020 on the European Essential Guarantees for surveillance measures"

      18 US Dep’t of Justice, "Promoting Public Safety, Privacy, and the Rule of Law Around the World: The Purpose and Impact of the CLOUD Act"

      19 D. Felz, "New EU data blockage as German court would ban many cookie management providers"

      20 CNIL, "Mémoire en Observations, Conseil d’Etat, Referé L, 521-2 CJA"

      21 Microsoft, "Microsoft Cloud enables customers to keep all personal data within European Data Boundary"

      22 EDPB, "Initial legal assessment of the impact of the US CLOUD Act on the EU legal framework for the protection of personal data and the negotiations of an EU-US Agreement on cross-border access to electronic evidence"

      23 "Information on U.S. Privacy Safeguards Relevant to SCCs and Other EU Legal Bases for EU-U.S. Data Transfers after Schrems II"

      24 Nigel Cory, "France’s “Sovereignty Requirements” for Cybersecurity Services Violate WTO Trade Law and Undermine Transatlantic Digital Trade and Cybersecurity Cooperation"

      25 Nigel Cory, "France—and Potentially EU—Cybersecurity Regulations: The Latest Barrier to Data Flows, Digital Trade, and Digital Cooperation Among Likeminded Partners" CBDF 2021

      26 Theodore Christakis, "European Digital Sovereignty: Successfully Navigating Between the ‘Brussels Effect’ and Europe’s Quest for Strategic Autonomy" MIAI/Grenoble Data Institute 2020

      27 Claudia Quelle, "Enhancing compliance under the general data protection regulation: the risky upshot of the accountability-and risk-based approach" 2018

      28 Oracle, "EU Sovereign Cloud" OCI

      29 "Décision n° 2024-205 du 13 mars 2024 mettant en demeure la société C8 NOR :RCAC2408029S JORF n°0067 du 20 mars 2024 Texte n° 76"

      30 Amazon Web Services, "Digital Sovereignty at AWS"

      31 CNIL, "Deliberation No. 2023-084 of 7 September 2023 on a draft decree relating to the organisation and operation of the national platform for combating competition manipulation, section D"

      32 "Decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor in complaint case 2020-1013 submitted by Members of the Parliament against the European Parliament"

      33 "Decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor in complaint case 2020-1013 submitted by Members of the Parliament against the European Parliament"

      34 Theodore Christakis, "Data, Extra-territoriality and International Solutions to Transatlantic Problems of Access to Digital Evidence - Legal Opinion on the Microsoft Ireland Case (US Supreme Court)"

      35 "DPA Decision on D155.027, 2021-0.586.257"

      36 Randal Milch, "Cybersecurity and Privacy in a Globalized World - Building Common Approaches" New York University School of Law 2019

      37 EDPB, "Coordinated Enforcement Action, Use of cloud-based services by the public sector"

      38 Matthias Bauer, "Building Resilience? The Cybersecurity, Economic & Trade Impacts of Cloud Immunity Requirements" ECIPE 2023

      39 Greenberg Traurig LLP, "Application of the CLOUD Act to EU Entities" Ministry of Justice and Security NCSC 2022

      40 Google Cloud, "Announcing Google Cloud’s new Digital Sovereignty Explorer"

      41 Theodore Christakis, "After Schrems II : Uncertainties on the Legal Basis for Data Transfers and Constitutional Implications for Europe"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼