행동기술훈련이 예비 특수교사의 자극선호도평가 수행정확도에 미치는 효과 = The Effect of Behavioral Skills Training on the Performance Accuracy of Stimulus Preference Assessment Implementation for Special Education Teaching Candidates

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

[Purpose] This study provided behavioral skills training consisting of written instruction, modeling, role-play, and feedback to special education teaching candidates to train paired-stimulus and multiple-stimulus-without-replacement preference assessment and to illuminate the effect of the training on the change, maintenance, and generalization of stimulus preference performance accuracy.
[Method] Three special education teaching candidates enrolled in secondary special education were trained in paired-stimulus and multiple-stimulus-without-replacement preference assessment through behavioral skills training. A multiple-baseline design was used across participants, consisting of a baseline, written instruction, modeling, role-play, feedback, maintenance, and generalization. Three children with developmental delays participated in the generalization evaluation. [Results] Stimulus preference assessment training via behavioral skills training improved the accuracy of the special education teaching candidate’s paired-stimulus and multiple-stimulus-without-replacement performance accuracy. Behavioral skills training was effective in improving, maintaining, and generalizing the performance accuracy of the paired-stimulus and multiple-stimulus-without-replacement preference assessment. In addition, the general evaluation conducted on children with developmental delays also showed high performance accuracy. [Conclusion] Behavioral skills training is effective in improving, maintaining, and generalizing the accuracy of paired-stimulus and multiple-stimulus-withoutreplacement preference assessment by special education teaching candidates.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 신주원 ; 안아현, "행동기술훈련이 예비 특수교육 교사의 비연속 개별시도 교수 수행정확도에 미치는 효과" 24 (24): 23-51, 2023

2 신주원 ; 박찬웅 ; 이효신, "행동기술훈련이 발달장애 아동 부모의 비연속 개별시도 교수 수행 정확도에 미치는 효과" 8 (8): 23-42, 2021

3 안아현 ; 박선희, "파워카드 전략이 자폐범주성장애아동 어휘 향상에 미치는 효과" 8 (8): 83-95, 2019

4 손순열 ; 허유성, "특수학교 교사의 교원능력개발평가결과 활용 및 효과성에 대한 인식이수업전문성과 직무만족도에 미치는 영향" 17 (17): 157-177, 2016

5 조민균 ; 손승현, "특수교육요구(SNE)를 지원하기 위한 특수교사의 교수역량 및 교원연수요구도 분석" 21 (21): 71-94, 2020

6 이은미, "특수교육교사의 직무수행능력 및 현직교육에 대한 인식 조사" 18 (18): 53-75, 2001

7 박유정, "특수교사의 자질 및 전문성에 관한 국내외 연구 고찰" 54 (54): 407-433, 2015

8 박유정 ; 김병건 ; 김민경, "특수교사의 자질 및 전문성에 관한 국내외 연구 고찰" 54 (54): 407-433, 2015

9 강경숙, "특수교사 양성 및 임용 관련 정책 고찰 및 개선방안 탐색" 2016 : 69-98, 2016

10 김미경, "촉진전략이 자폐스펙트럼장애 학생의 요구행동에 미치는 효과" 24 (24): 155-173, 2020

11 배은희, "차별강화와 반응대가 중재가 정신지체아동의 상동행동에 미치는 효과" 16 (16): 235-253, 2000

12 박현옥 ; 강혜경, "유아특수교사 양성을 위한 실습과정 탐색: 현장 전문가의 목소리를 중심으로" 17 (17): 87-109, 2018

13 강영모 ; 양문봉, "기능기반의 중재 패키지가 뇌병변장애 아동의 순응행동에 미치는 효과" 7 (7): 1-18, 2020

14 강영모 ; 강윤모 ; 손승현, "개별화된 긍정적 행동중재와 지원(PBIS)이 지적장애 학생의 수업참여 행동에 미치는 효과" 8 (8): 75-100, 2021

15 Leaf, J. B., "Utility of formal preference assessments for individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder" 50 (50): 199-212, 2015

16 Lipschultz, J. L., "Using video modeling with voiceover instruction to train staff to conduct stimulus preference assessments" 27 (27): 505-532, 2015

17 Lavie, T., "Training staff to conduct a paired stimulus preference assessment" 35 (35): 209-211, 2002

18 Sturmey, P., "The internal consistency and factor structure of the Choice Assessment Scale" 24 (24): 317-322, 2003

19 Gottschalk, J. M., "The effects of stablishing operations on preference assessment outcomes" 33 (33): 85-88, 2000

20 Egel A. L., "The effects of constant vs varied reinforcer presentation on responding by autistic children" 30 (30): 455-463, 1980

21 Sarokoff, R. A., "The effects of behavioral skills training on staff implementation of discrete-trial teaching" 37 (37): 535-538, 2004

22 Rosales, R., "The effects of behavioral skills training on implementation of the picture exchange communication system" 42 (42): 541-549, 2009

23 Matson, J. L., "The development of a reinforcer choice assessment scale for persons with severe and profound mental retardation" 20 (20): 379-384, 1999

24 Cardon, T. A., "Teaching caregivers to implement video modeling imitation training via iPad for their children with autism" 6 (6): 1389-1400, 2012

25 Bishop, M. R., "Teaching behavioral therapists to conduct brief preference assessments during therapy sessions" 6 (6): 450-457, 2012

26 Brownell, M. T., "Special education teacher quality and preparation : Exposing foundations, constructing a new model" 76 (76): 357-377, 2010

27 Kim, B. H, "Special Education Teacher Theory" Daegu University Publisher 2011

28 Windsor, J., "Preference testing : A comparison of two presentation methods" 15 (15): 439-455, 1994

29 Shapiro, M., "Preference assessment training via self instruction : A replication and extension" 49 (49): 794-808, 2016

30 Hagopian, L. P., "Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities" 28 (28): 668-677, 2004

31 Bowman, L. G., "On the relation of mands and the function of destructive behavior" 30 (30): 251-265, 1997

32 Han, K. G, "Is there a problem with special teacher training system and teacher qualification inspection order?" 2015 (2015): 1-28, 2015

33 Fisher, W. W., "Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification" 101 : 15-25, 1996

34 Scruggs, T. E., "How to summarize single-participant research : Ideas and applications" 9 (9): 227-244, 2001

35 Dignnaro Reed, F. D., "Guidelines for using behavioral skills training to provide teacher support" 50 (50): 373-380, 2018

36 Jeon, B. U., "Exploring way to improve the curriculum of teacher training Institutions to enhance special teacher expertise" 47-58, 2016

37 Steinbrenner, J. R., "Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism" FPG Child Development Institute 2020

38 Graff, R. B., "Evaluation of a self instruction package for conducting stimulus preference assessments" 45 (45): 69-82, 2012

39 DeLeon, I. G., "Evaluation of a multiple stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences" 29 (29): 519-533, 1996

40 Roane, H. S., "Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment" 31 (31): 605-620, 1998

41 Roscoe, E. M., "Evaluating the relative effects of feedback and contingent money for staff training of stimulus preference assessments" 39 (39): 63-77, 2006

42 Hagopian, L. P., "Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment" 34 (34): 475-485, 2001

43 Vollmer, T. R., "Establishing operations and reinforcement effects" 24 (24): 279-291, 1991

44 Karsten, A. M., "Description of a practitioner model for identifying preferred stimuli with individuals with autism spectrum disorders" 35 (35): 347-369, 2011

45 Ward-Horner, J., "Componet analysis of behavior skills training in functional analysis" 27 (27): 75-92, 2012

46 Kang, S., "Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures : A review of the literature" 34 (34): 1125-1133, 2013

47 Pace, G. M., "Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals" 18 (18): 249-255, 1985

48 Cooper, J. O., "Applied behavior analysis" Pearson 2007

49 Lee, H. S., "Applied Behavior Analysis for Teachers" Hakjisa 2014

50 Green, C. W., "A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps" 24 (24): 537-552, 1991

51 Fisher, W. W., "A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities" 25 (25): 491-498, 1992