RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Kant의 자아와 시간 = The self and time of Kant

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3145212

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Is the self being or not beng?and,Is our self change or not change? This is a common question. But this is a basic question in our life.
      In Buddisim, everything is change andchange, and all things are not stationary. All things are created from nothing, and all things return to nothing. All beings come from nothing and return to nothing. And all beings are move and move. Also the self is move and move.
      In Western philosophy. D. Hume raise a question about the being of self. By Hume's Argument the self is nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions, which succeed each other with an in conceivable rapidity, and are in perceptual flux and movement. But Descartes insist that the self is fixed. Although all perceptions are flux and movement, the self go beyond all perceptions. The self is transcendence. And the attribute of self is thinking. I thingk,therefore Iam. It is seperated from perception. It is substantia cogitans.
      In kant's view, the self has two characteristics. The one is transcendental self, and the other is empirical self. Then I intend to arrange kantian views.
      First the transcendental self is pure intelligence. It is independent from all sensible expeience. But it is different from the concept of the self of Descartes. The concept of the self of Descartes is a substence of the soul. It is a substence that have all characteristics of intellegence, feeling and will. But, in kantian view, the transcendental self is different from the all experience.(feeling, will) It is emptiness. It has no substence of experience. It has no phenomenon.
      Second, in kantian view, the empirical self is the same thing that we call inner sense. It is the foundation that the self receive all sensible data through the from of time.
      Third, the empirical self is change and change continuously, in kantion view. These kantian view is the same that Hume assert. All things is change and change in time. But kant assert that 〈I think〉 is accompany to all experience. 〈I think〉is a function of transcendental self. All sensible experience is change. But 〈I think〉is unchanged. Nevethless, all sensible experience is change,〈I think〉is constant. It is the basis that the self maintains identity.
      번역하기

      Is the self being or not beng?and,Is our self change or not change? This is a common question. But this is a basic question in our life. In Buddisim, everything is change andchange, and all things are not stationary. All things are created from nothi...

      Is the self being or not beng?and,Is our self change or not change? This is a common question. But this is a basic question in our life.
      In Buddisim, everything is change andchange, and all things are not stationary. All things are created from nothing, and all things return to nothing. All beings come from nothing and return to nothing. And all beings are move and move. Also the self is move and move.
      In Western philosophy. D. Hume raise a question about the being of self. By Hume's Argument the self is nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions, which succeed each other with an in conceivable rapidity, and are in perceptual flux and movement. But Descartes insist that the self is fixed. Although all perceptions are flux and movement, the self go beyond all perceptions. The self is transcendence. And the attribute of self is thinking. I thingk,therefore Iam. It is seperated from perception. It is substantia cogitans.
      In kant's view, the self has two characteristics. The one is transcendental self, and the other is empirical self. Then I intend to arrange kantian views.
      First the transcendental self is pure intelligence. It is independent from all sensible expeience. But it is different from the concept of the self of Descartes. The concept of the self of Descartes is a substence of the soul. It is a substence that have all characteristics of intellegence, feeling and will. But, in kantian view, the transcendental self is different from the all experience.(feeling, will) It is emptiness. It has no substence of experience. It has no phenomenon.
      Second, in kantian view, the empirical self is the same thing that we call inner sense. It is the foundation that the self receive all sensible data through the from of time.
      Third, the empirical self is change and change continuously, in kantion view. These kantian view is the same that Hume assert. All things is change and change in time. But kant assert that 〈I think〉 is accompany to all experience. 〈I think〉is a function of transcendental self. All sensible experience is change. But 〈I think〉is unchanged. Nevethless, all sensible experience is change,〈I think〉is constant. It is the basis that the self maintains identity.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1.서론
      • 2.자아는 참으로 존재하는가?
      • 3.실체로서의 자아
      • 4.칸트의 자아개념
      • 1)선험적 자아의 본질
      • 1.서론
      • 2.자아는 참으로 존재하는가?
      • 3.실체로서의 자아
      • 4.칸트의 자아개념
      • 1)선험적 자아의 본질
      • 2)경험적 자아
      • 3)경험적 자아의 본질과 시간
      • 5.결론
      • 〈참고문헌〉
      • 〈Summary〉
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼