RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      派生商品去來의 契約法的 展開 = Contractual developments of Derivatives

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76478081

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      1) In the spot contract, buyers and sellers agree on agreement and delivery at the time. But in the forward or future contract, both determined in another time. There are time-lapse between the dates of agreement and delivery in the latter. This structure naturally expose both buyers and sellers to default risks. As a rule, futures differs from forward in that physical delivery hardly takes place, whereas actual delivery does take place in forward transactions.
      2) A future contract is an agreement to buy or sell a specific amount of a commodities at a particular price on a stipulated future trade. But the parties does not negotiate the terms of agreement as these are all standardised. Futures and insurance are all an important tools for risk management. Futures contract is eventually zero-sum game. The loss in one is likely to offset by a gain in the other. But insurance contracts are based on statistics. The other insured in here are helpful to one.
      3) Options are also like futures a way of managing and reducing risk. That are more versatile and strategic to the investor. Option purchaser is granted the privilege of buying(call option) or selling(put option) a underlying commodity. If the price fluctuates, he is, as a result, more attractive than the option writer. The buyers pay the seller a fee for granting the privilege. This fee is called the premium. An option may be defined as the right, but not an obligation to buy or sell a particular item. But we must not conclude that option trade is an unequal contract.
      4) Even though futures are an zero-sum game, derivatives are harmful to the parties with its complexity, market manipulation and fraud. Moreover many cryptic derivatives in recent are very hard to understand completely. Therefore we need an authority to supervise derivatives market. In Korea, FSS(Financial Supervisory Service) practices this function as CFTC does in the United States. We need other foreign legislatives to cope with these problems. Because experiences in USA, Japan and other countries will be an important test for us.
      번역하기

      1) In the spot contract, buyers and sellers agree on agreement and delivery at the time. But in the forward or future contract, both determined in another time. There are time-lapse between the dates of agreement and delivery in the latter. This struc...

      1) In the spot contract, buyers and sellers agree on agreement and delivery at the time. But in the forward or future contract, both determined in another time. There are time-lapse between the dates of agreement and delivery in the latter. This structure naturally expose both buyers and sellers to default risks. As a rule, futures differs from forward in that physical delivery hardly takes place, whereas actual delivery does take place in forward transactions.
      2) A future contract is an agreement to buy or sell a specific amount of a commodities at a particular price on a stipulated future trade. But the parties does not negotiate the terms of agreement as these are all standardised. Futures and insurance are all an important tools for risk management. Futures contract is eventually zero-sum game. The loss in one is likely to offset by a gain in the other. But insurance contracts are based on statistics. The other insured in here are helpful to one.
      3) Options are also like futures a way of managing and reducing risk. That are more versatile and strategic to the investor. Option purchaser is granted the privilege of buying(call option) or selling(put option) a underlying commodity. If the price fluctuates, he is, as a result, more attractive than the option writer. The buyers pay the seller a fee for granting the privilege. This fee is called the premium. An option may be defined as the right, but not an obligation to buy or sell a particular item. But we must not conclude that option trade is an unequal contract.
      4) Even though futures are an zero-sum game, derivatives are harmful to the parties with its complexity, market manipulation and fraud. Moreover many cryptic derivatives in recent are very hard to understand completely. Therefore we need an authority to supervise derivatives market. In Korea, FSS(Financial Supervisory Service) practices this function as CFTC does in the United States. We need other foreign legislatives to cope with these problems. Because experiences in USA, Japan and other countries will be an important test for us.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 派生商品去來의 종류와 기본개념
      • Ⅲ. 다른 거래형태와의 차이
      • Ⅳ. 파생상품거래의 법적 효력
      • Ⅴ. 파생상품거래의 규제 상 문제점
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 派生商品去來의 종류와 기본개념
      • Ⅲ. 다른 거래형태와의 차이
      • Ⅳ. 파생상품거래의 법적 효력
      • Ⅴ. 파생상품거래의 규제 상 문제점
      • Ⅵ. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "파생상품의 회계처리에 관한 해석의 평가" 9 (9): 2000

      2 "파생금융상품의 도입과 활용" 한국금융연구원 1996

      3 "최신외국환거래법" 법경사 1999

      4 "증권시장의 이해" 한국증권업협회 2005.3

      5 "증권거래법 제3판" 두성사 2005

      6 "주가지수옵션투자" 2 : 2000

      7 "선물거래실무" 형설출판사 2000

      8 "선물·옵션이론 및 실무" 경문사 2002

      9 "선물·옵션거래론" 두남 2001

      10 "보험·해상법" 형설출판사 2003

      1 "파생상품의 회계처리에 관한 해석의 평가" 9 (9): 2000

      2 "파생금융상품의 도입과 활용" 한국금융연구원 1996

      3 "최신외국환거래법" 법경사 1999

      4 "증권시장의 이해" 한국증권업협회 2005.3

      5 "증권거래법 제3판" 두성사 2005

      6 "주가지수옵션투자" 2 : 2000

      7 "선물거래실무" 형설출판사 2000

      8 "선물·옵션이론 및 실무" 경문사 2002

      9 "선물·옵션거래론" 두남 2001

      10 "보험·해상법" 형설출판사 2003

      11 "농산물가격 위험관리와 밭떼기거래의 개선방안" 41 (41): 2000.12

      12 "松岡久和 “商品先物去來と 不法行爲責任 - 債務不履行構成の 再評價-“"

      13 "ドイツにおける金融派生商品の計上問題" 2001

      14 "“投資事業者の 忠實義務と 專門家責任”" 「立命館大學 人文社會科學硏究所

      15 "Modern Financial Techniques, Derivatives and Law" 2000

      16 "Legislative and Structural Developments:Banking Reform for Securities" 2000.8

      17 "Legal Principles of Derivatives" 2002.1

      18 "Kuempel, Bank und Kapitalrecht" 1995

      19 "Islamic Commercial Law -An Analysis of Futures and Options" 2000

      20 "Fiduciary Duties under the Commodity Exchange Act" 1992

      21 "Creating a flexible fiduciary duty rule for banks entering into proprietary derivatives contracts Annual Review of Banking Law" 1996

      22 "Claussen, Bank- und Boersenrecht" 2000

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-04-22 학회명변경 영문명 : The Association For Korean Law Of Property -> THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF PROPERTY LAW KCI등재
      2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-10-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> THE JOURNAL OF PROPERTY LAW KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.89 0.89 0.74
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.72 0.71 0.86 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼