RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    1989년 이후 이중적 중미관계: 장저민과 클린턴의 인지지도 분석을 중심으로 = Empirical Analysis of the Back and Forth Relationship between China and U.S since 1989: focusing on the Jiangzemin and Clinton`s cognitive map

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99538235

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper aims at investigating and identifying the factor that has led the back and forth relationship between China and the United States since 1989. Previous studies on this subject addressed the issue by taking either of two approaches: one with the micro view that interprets the back and forth relationship in the context of the end of the Cold war, on other hand, with the macro view that interprets the fragile relationship in the context of the rise of China. However, neither of the approaches explains with sufficiency the question at hand. Hence for the inquiry, this article suggests a fresh view by exploring alternative method of using a cognitive map of each nation`s leader, Jiangzemin and Bill Clinton. This article provides an empirical analysis through the Selected works of Jiangzemin and the speeches of Bill Clinton in 1998 for the first time in the field of Sino-US relationship studies in Korea. With the results of the cognitive map analysis, we can reach the following four points. Firstly, indicators of the forth relationship between China and the US are: i) the recognition by Bill Clinton on the importance of China`s economic growth and; ii) the US`s cooperation of science technology with China. Second, the conflict between China and the US results from the discordance of opinions on the matter of human rights and military power. Second, the conflict will inevitably arise on environmental issues around the globe including a global warming. Third, while China has yet to find a legitimate reason to agree upon these issues with the US, the US urges China of its cooperation. Lastly, Both China and the US attach great importance to the alliance with Japan. This implicates that relatively, issues involving Japan take more control in the China-US relationship, than those of Korea Peninsula.
    번역하기

    This paper aims at investigating and identifying the factor that has led the back and forth relationship between China and the United States since 1989. Previous studies on this subject addressed the issue by taking either of two approaches: one with ...

    This paper aims at investigating and identifying the factor that has led the back and forth relationship between China and the United States since 1989. Previous studies on this subject addressed the issue by taking either of two approaches: one with the micro view that interprets the back and forth relationship in the context of the end of the Cold war, on other hand, with the macro view that interprets the fragile relationship in the context of the rise of China. However, neither of the approaches explains with sufficiency the question at hand. Hence for the inquiry, this article suggests a fresh view by exploring alternative method of using a cognitive map of each nation`s leader, Jiangzemin and Bill Clinton. This article provides an empirical analysis through the Selected works of Jiangzemin and the speeches of Bill Clinton in 1998 for the first time in the field of Sino-US relationship studies in Korea. With the results of the cognitive map analysis, we can reach the following four points. Firstly, indicators of the forth relationship between China and the US are: i) the recognition by Bill Clinton on the importance of China`s economic growth and; ii) the US`s cooperation of science technology with China. Second, the conflict between China and the US results from the discordance of opinions on the matter of human rights and military power. Second, the conflict will inevitably arise on environmental issues around the globe including a global warming. Third, while China has yet to find a legitimate reason to agree upon these issues with the US, the US urges China of its cooperation. Lastly, Both China and the US attach great importance to the alliance with Japan. This implicates that relatively, issues involving Japan take more control in the China-US relationship, than those of Korea Peninsula.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김재철, "패권, 다극화, 그리고 중-미관계: 세계질서를 둘러싼 경쟁?" 한국국제정치학회 42 (42): 327-345, 2002

    2 이동률, "중국민족주의가 대외관계에 미치는 영향: 중미관계를 중심으로" 41 (41): 2001

    3 김도훈, "시스템다이내믹스" 대영문화사 1999

    4 김동환, "시스템 사고" 선학사 2004

    5 주형민, "미중관계의 과거, 현재, 미래 : 협력자 혹은 경쟁자" 평화와 민주주의연구소 19 (19): 75-123, 2011

    6 김홍규, "미중관계 분석" 외교안보연구원 2009

    7 윤견수, "딜레마와 제도의 설계" 나남신서 2009

    8 김동환, "녹색성장에 관한 이명박 대통령의 인지지도 분석" 한국시스템다이내믹스학회 10 (10): 39-51, 2009

    9 신종호, "국제전략환경의 변화와 중미관계" 아태지역연구센터 29 (29): 113-141, 2005

    10 王栋, "超越国家利益:探寻对20世纪90年代中美关系的知觉性解释" 3 : 2001

    1 김재철, "패권, 다극화, 그리고 중-미관계: 세계질서를 둘러싼 경쟁?" 한국국제정치학회 42 (42): 327-345, 2002

    2 이동률, "중국민족주의가 대외관계에 미치는 영향: 중미관계를 중심으로" 41 (41): 2001

    3 김도훈, "시스템다이내믹스" 대영문화사 1999

    4 김동환, "시스템 사고" 선학사 2004

    5 주형민, "미중관계의 과거, 현재, 미래 : 협력자 혹은 경쟁자" 평화와 민주주의연구소 19 (19): 75-123, 2011

    6 김홍규, "미중관계 분석" 외교안보연구원 2009

    7 윤견수, "딜레마와 제도의 설계" 나남신서 2009

    8 김동환, "녹색성장에 관한 이명박 대통령의 인지지도 분석" 한국시스템다이내믹스학회 10 (10): 39-51, 2009

    9 신종호, "국제전략환경의 변화와 중미관계" 아태지역연구센터 29 (29): 113-141, 2005

    10 王栋, "超越国家利益:探寻对20世纪90年代中美关系的知觉性解释" 3 : 2001

    11 "江泽民文选 第一卷、第二卷、第三卷" 人民出版社出版, 中共中央文献编辑委员会 2006

    12 贾庆国, "棘手的合作:中美关系的现状与前瞻" 文化出版社 1998

    13 杨洁勉, "布什连任和中美关系的走向" 1 : 2005

    14 陶文钊, "布什当政以来的中美关系" 15 (15): 2004

    15 阎学通, "对中美关系不稳定的分析" 12 : 2010

    16 刘明, "博弈:冷战后的美国与中国" 中国传媒大学出版社 2005

    17 焦世新, "利益的权衡:美国在中国加入国际机制中的作用" 世界知识出版社 2009

    18 Holsti, O., "“The Operational Code” Approach to the Study of Political Leaders:John Fster Dulles' Philosophical and Instrumental Beliefs" 3 : 123-157, 1970

    19 "http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/saps.php"

    20 Robert G. Sutter, "U.S.-Chinese Relations:Perilous Past, Pragmatic Present" Rowman & littlefield Publichers, INC 2010

    21 George, A., "The Operational Code: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision Making" 13 : 190-222, 1969

    22 Holsti, O., "The Operational Code as an Approcah to the Analysis of Belief Systems" 1977

    23 George, A., "The Causal Nexus Between Cognitive Belifes and Decision-making Behavior: The Operational Code Belief System" Westwiew Press 95-124, 1979

    24 "The American Presidency Project" Statements of Administration Policy

    25 Walker, Schafer, Young, "Systematic Procedures for Operational Code Analysis: Measuring and Modeling Jimmy Carter's Operational Code" 42 : 175-190, 1998

    26 Axelrod. R., "Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites" Princeton University Press 1976

    27 Coleman, J. S., "Social capital in the creation of human capital" 94 : 95-120, 1998

    28 Stephan G Walker, "Presidential operational codes and foreign policy conflicts in the post-cold war world" 43 (43): 610-, 1999

    29 Eden, C., "Cognitive mapping and problem structuring for systems model building" 10 (10): 257-275, 1994

    30 JiaQingguo, "China’s New Leadership and Strategic Relations with the United States" 4 (4): 2005

    31 Rowemary Foot, "China, the United States, and Global Order" Cambridge Press 2011

    32 김호준, "21세기 미?중 관계의 결정요인" 대한정치학회 10 (10): 315-338, 2003

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-06-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국시스템다이네믹스학회 -> 한국시스템다이내믹스학회
    영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean System Dynamics Society
    KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.55
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.56 0.48 0.599 0.39
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼