관찰 · 추천 영재판별에서의 측정학적 쟁점과 과제 = Psychometric Issues and Challenges of Teacher Nominations in the Identification of Gifted Students

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 논문은 영재판별의 새로운 대안으로 제시되고 있는 관찰추천의 대두배경과 의미를 논의하고, 관찰추천이 가지는 한계와 가능성을 비판적으로 검토하며, 효과적인 관찰추천이 이루어지기 위한 조건들에 대해 제언하였다. 영재판별은 영재교육의 출발점이자 영재교육의 성과와 불가분의 관계를 맺고 있는 핵심 절차다. 최근 선발고사 위주의 영재판별이 타당성과 공정성 문제를 야기할 수 있다는 자각과 더불어, 통합적접근에 기반을 두는 관찰추천에 의한 영재판별이 정책적으로 제안되었다. 이 논문에서는 이러한 변화에 대한 이론적 근거로서, 현행 영재판별과 선발의 일원화 문제, 다중적이고 역동적인 영재성 개념에 부합하지 않는 판별, 판별절차와 영재교육 프로그램 목적과의 불일치, 판별에서 배제되는 소외영재의 문제, 인지적 능력 중심의 판별문제 등이 제기되었다. 선발고사에 대한 대안으로 제시된 관찰추천의 측정학적 쟁점사항으로는 학생의 배경변인과 관련된 교사 편견의 문제, 관찰추천에 영향을 미칠 수있는 영재성 이외의 학생 행동특성 문제, 교사 전문성 문제, 교사평정척도의 측정학적 결함 등을 들 수 있다. 이에 대한 논의와 더불어, 관찰추천이 유효한 대안이 되기 위한 선결조건으로서 교사 전문성 개발, 지속적인 관찰 실행, 평정척도의 개발 및 양호도 검증, 다양한 정보원과 관찰자료의 활용 등이 제언되었다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper discusses the significance of teacher nomination as an alternative procedure for identifying gifted students, critically examines its limitations and possibilities, and suggests the prerequisites for its effective implementation. Identification is a starting point for gifted education, which would essentially and ultimately influence its outcome. With the general awareness that the current identification procedure mainly based on standardized assessments can raise validity and equity issues, teacher recommendation of students to gifted programs was suggested as the sole procedure for identification. Regarding its theoretical grounds, several issues were addressed including the unification of current identification and selection procedures, identification incompatible with multifaceted and dynamic conception of giftedness, discrepancy between identification and the goals of gifted programs, and identification centered on assessing intellectual and academic abilities. The paper also discusses as psychometric issues teacher bias regarding student backgrounds, student behavior characteristics which can influence teacher nominations, lack of teacher expertise, and psychometric properties of the existing teacher rating scales. To improve the effectiveness of teacher nominations, following prerequisites need to be satisfied: teacher professional development should be provided; teachers need to conduct continuous observation of student behaviors; teacher rating scales with known psychometric properties need to be developed and used; and teachers should try to utilize multiple sources and types of information about students.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 〈요 약〉
• Ⅰ. 서 론
• Ⅱ. 관찰 · 추천의 대두배경과 의미
• Ⅲ. 관찰 · 추천 영재판별에서의 측정학적 쟁점과 과제
• Ⅳ. 결 론
• 참 고 문 헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최호성, "중등 영재 판별과 교육 프로그램의 비판적 검토" 13 (13): 1-28, 2003

2 장낙한, "우리나라 대학부설 과학영재교육원의 영재학생 선발과정에 대한 비교 분석" 16 (16): 101-122, 2006

3 정경아, "영재교육 성별 실태 및 영재 여학생 육성 방안" 한국여성정책연구원 2006

4 교육과학기술부, "보도자료"

5 박민정, "과학 영재교육 대상자 선발방법으로써 교사 추천제 분석: 학생의 과학적 태도, 탐구력, 사고력, 문제 해결력, 창의성을 중심으로" 한국과학교육학회 28 (28): 111-119, 2008

6 Renzulli, J, "What makes giftedness?: Reexamining a definition" 180-184, 1978

7 Hoge, R. D, "The use of teacher-judgment measures in the identification of gifted pupils" 2 : 181-196, 1986

8 Mckenzie, J. A, "The influence of identification practices, race and SES on the identification of gifted students" 30 : 93-95, 1986

9 Scott, M. S, "The identification of giftedness: A comparison of white, Hispanic and black families" 36 : 131-139, 1992

10 Balchin, T, "Teacher nominations of giftedness: Investigating the beliefs of British G&T co-ordinators" 32 : 34-45, 2008

11 Elhoweirs, H, "Teacher judgment in identifying gifted/talented students" 35-38, 2008

12 Borland, J. H, "Teacher identification of the gifted: A new look" 2 : 22-32, 1978

13 Neber, J, "Teacher identification of students for gifted programs: Nominations to a summer school for highly-gifted students" 46 : 348-362, 2004

14 Gagné, F, "Sex differences in the aptitudes and talents of children as judged by peers and teachers" 37 : 69-77, 1993

15 Renzulli, J. S, "Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students" Creative Learning Press 1997

16 Ford, D. Y, "Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students: Promising practices and programs" Teachers College Press 1996

17 Betts, G. T, "Profiles of the gifted and talented" 32 : 248-253, 1988

18 Pegnato, C. W, "Locating gifted children in junior high schools: A comparison of methods" 25 : 300-304, 1959

19 Reffel, J. A, "Limited participation of low-SES and minority children in gifted education programs" 2004

20 Gagné, F, "Is there any light at the end of the tunnel" 22 : 191-234, 1999

21 Schroth, S. T, "Identifying gifted students: Educator beliefs regarding various policies, processes, and procedures" 32 : 155-179, 2008

22 Jarosewich, T, "Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments" 20 (20): 322-336, 2002

23 Johnsen, S. K, "Identifying gifted and talented learners, in Achieving excellence: Educating the gifted and talented" Merrill 135-153, 2008

24 Crombie, G, "Gifted programs: Gender differences in referral and enrollment" 36 : 213-214, 1992

25 Siegle, D, "Gender differences in teacher and student perceptions of gifted students' ability and effort" 42 : 39-47, 1998

26 Siegle, D, "Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs" 48 : 21-29, 2004

27 Davis, G. A, "Education of the gifted and talented" Allyn & Bacon 2003

28 Guskin, S. L, "Do teachers react to "Multiple Intelligences"? Effects of teachers' stereotypes on judgments and expectancies for students with diverse patterns of giftedness/talent" 36 : 32-37, 1992

29 Perleth, C, "Developmental trajectories of giftedness in children, in International handbook on giftedness" Springer 319-335, 2009

30 Bloom, B. S, "Developing talent in young children" Ballantine Books 1985

31 Gardner, H, "Creative lives and creative works: A synthetic scientific approaches, in The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives" Cambridge University Press 298-324, 1988

32 Pfeiffer, S. I, "Challenges and opportunities for students who are gifted: What the experts say" 47 : 161-169, 2003

33 Bracken, A. B, "Behavioral identification and assessment of gifted and talented students" 24 (24): 112-122, 2006

34 Brown, S. W, "Assumptions underlying the identification of gifted and talented students" 49 : 68-79, 2005

35 Gagné, F, "Are teachers really poor talent detectors? Comments on Pegnato and Birch's (1959) study of the effectiveness and efficiency of various identification techniques" 38 : 124-126, 1994

36 Hunsaker, S. L, "An analysis of teacher nominations and student performance in gifted programs" 41 : 19-24, 1997

37 Fox, L. H, "An accelerated mathematics program for girls: A longitudinal evaluation, in Academic precocity: Aspects of its development" Johns Hopkins University Press 113-131, 1983

38 Hallinan, M, "Ability grouping and sex differences in mathematics achievement" 60 : 63-72, 1987

39 전동렬, "2006 대학 연계 협력연구 보고서" 2007