구분소유적 공유관계의 법적 구성에 관한 검토 = Legal Analysis of Sectional Co-ownership

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It is called sectional co-ownership relations that two or more persons agreed to specify the location and area of real estate and to hold sectional ownership, and they make a registration in proportion to their own shares as sectional co-ownership.
There are some questions of requisites of establishing, grounds of rule, effects on sectional ownership, because of no provisions in Korea Civil Act. With regard to legal character of sectional co-ownership, the are two theories in Korea, - theory of co-ownership and theory of title trust(judicial precedent).
This paper points out that each theory is deficient in solving all the problems on sectional co-ownership.
There are many advanced researches on sectional co-ownership. This paper focused on the fields that are not reviewed or are not sufficiently examined by other advanced researches.
This paper looks on the problems of objective indicator to make border between co-owners. If there were no physical borders specifying the location and area of each sectional co-owners, sectional ownership may not be granted on the lands or buildings.
Both theories grant that, the sectional co-owner can lease to third person on the sectional part of the co-owned land or building. On the sectional co-owner's leasing acts to third person on the sectional part of the co-owned land or building, the agreement between co-owners should be the grounds for the certain co-owner's. But, for applicant for registration of leasehold, all the co-owners should apply for registration to the registration office, because a registrar may not know the existence of the sectional co-ownership contracts between co-owners.
When Certain co-owners transferred to third person the parts, his or her exclusively occupying parts of the land or the building, there are controversy about the grounds for keeping on the sectional co-ownership between assignee of sectional co-ownership and other sectional co-owner. Title trust theory explains it with implied consent theory that grants the existence of consent between assignee of sectional co-ownership and other sectional co-owner. But, co-ownership theory explains it that a claim that one of co-owners holds against other co-owners with respect to the property in co-ownership, may be exercised against their specific assignee. But this paper points out that co-ownership theory may beyond the limits of Korea Civil Code, not providing the provision for applying covenant between co-owners to the assignee.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 서정우, "토지의 구분소유적 공유" 법원행정처 1973

2 서옥하, "토지분할 규제 정책의 한계에 관한 연구" 한국지적학회 29 (29): 161-171, 2013

3 법무부, "집합건물법 해석사례집"

4 박종두, "집합건물법" 삼영사 2011

5 김용담, "주석민법 물권2" 한국사법행정학회 2011

6 이종찬, "일필의 토지의 일부에 대한 취득시효요건으로서의 점유" 법원도서관 (11) : 1990

7 이시윤, "신민사집행법" 박영사 2016

8 법원행정처, "부동산등기실무2"

9 서정우, "민사판례연구" 박영사 1993

10 전병서, "민사집행법" 박영사 2019

11 양형우, "민법의 세계" 피앤씨미디어 2019

12 김상용, "민법개론" 화산미디어 2015

13 박동진, "물권법강의" 법문사 2018

14 이덕환, "물권법" 율곡미디어 2011

15 김증한, "물권법" 박영사 1998

16 이영준, "물권법" 박영사 2017

17 김준호, "물권법" 법문사 2019

18 김상용, "물권법" 화산미디어 2018

19 김병두, "구분소유적 공유의 법적 구조에 관한 일고찰" 법학연구소 18 (18): 189-232, 2010

20 김일룡, "구분소유적 공유의 법리" 한양법학회 10 : 1999

21 배병일, "구분소유적 공유의 개념과 법적 성질" 법학연구원 18 (18): 207-232, 2006

22 박의근, "구분소유적 공유에서의 공지분에 관한 비판적 검토" 법학연구소 31 (31): 329-355, 2014

23 김영란, "구분소유적 공유에서 공지분이 생기는 경우 및 명의신탁이 존속하는 경우" 법조협회 (447) : 1993

24 신봉근, "구분소유적 공유에 관한 법률적 재검토" 한국재산법학회 29 (29): 239-257, 2012

25 최창렬, "구분소유적 공유법리의 재고" 한국재산법학회 22 (22): 35-74, 2006

26 신국미, "구분소유적 공유관계의 법적 성질" 청주대학교법학연구소 31 (31): 2009

27 박세창, "구분소유적 공유관계에 관한 검토" 한국집합건물법학회 4 : 2009

28 川井 健, "新版 注釋民法(7)物權(2)" 有斐閣 2007

29 裵成鎬, "區分所有的 共有關係에 있어서 空持分의 理論과 名義信託關係" 한국비교사법학회 10 (10): 126-156, 2003