RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      What Is “K”?*1): Hybridity, Identity, and Global Perceptions of K-Pop

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110046284

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study examines how the meaning and boundaries of K-pop are constituted through the interplay of musical hybridity, industrial structure, and audience recognition. Moving beyond descriptive accounts of K-pop’s global success, it proposes a comparative and theoretically grounded framework that situates K-pop within the broader landscape of global popular music. Through analyses of its relationship with Swedish pop, Latin pop, and world music, the paper argues that K-pop is neither defined by fixed musical or linguistic features nor confined to Korean ethnicity or geography. Instead, its distinctiveness lies in a business model-an integrated “agency– idol system” based on “total management strategy” that combines long-term training, synchronized choreography, audiovisual storytelling, and coordinated multimedia rollouts. While this model anchors K-pop’s Korean provenance, it simultaneously enables transnational adaptability. The paper further explores how the “K” functions as a polyvalent signifier: a marker of national authorship for domestic audiences, a symbol of cosmopolitan modernity for global fans, and a representation of cultural visibility for diasporic communities. By reframing K-pop as both a cultural product and an institutional practice, this study contributes to broader discussions of hybridity, globalization, and cultural identity in popular music. It concludes by calling for further empirical research on audience perception and fan reception to clarify how K-pop’s meanings are negotiated across different cultural contexts.
      번역하기

      This study examines how the meaning and boundaries of K-pop are constituted through the interplay of musical hybridity, industrial structure, and audience recognition. Moving beyond descriptive accounts of K-pop’s global success, it proposes a compa...

      This study examines how the meaning and boundaries of K-pop are constituted through the interplay of musical hybridity, industrial structure, and audience recognition. Moving beyond descriptive accounts of K-pop’s global success, it proposes a comparative and theoretically grounded framework that situates K-pop within the broader landscape of global popular music. Through analyses of its relationship with Swedish pop, Latin pop, and world music, the paper argues that K-pop is neither defined by fixed musical or linguistic features nor confined to Korean ethnicity or geography. Instead, its distinctiveness lies in a business model-an integrated “agency– idol system” based on “total management strategy” that combines long-term training, synchronized choreography, audiovisual storytelling, and coordinated multimedia rollouts. While this model anchors K-pop’s Korean provenance, it simultaneously enables transnational adaptability. The paper further explores how the “K” functions as a polyvalent signifier: a marker of national authorship for domestic audiences, a symbol of cosmopolitan modernity for global fans, and a representation of cultural visibility for diasporic communities. By reframing K-pop as both a cultural product and an institutional practice, this study contributes to broader discussions of hybridity, globalization, and cultural identity in popular music. It concludes by calling for further empirical research on audience perception and fan reception to clarify how K-pop’s meanings are negotiated across different cultural contexts.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼