북한 민사소송법과 중국 민사소송법의 상호관련성에 관한 고찰 = The correlationship between North Korea and China's civil procedural reform in the view of historical changes

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK; North Korea) enacted civil procedure law in 1976 and revised first in 1994, second in 2002. People's Republic of China (PRC) enacted civil procedure law in 1982 and amended first in 1991.The north Korea's 1994 and 2004 civil procedural reform acts have these characteristics; evasion of political phrases, accepting foreign law as a sort of source of law, revision of jurisdictional clause, affirmative manipulation of public procutor, going into the midst of the people at the trial procedure, independence of individual court, participation of the people as a layman judge and clauses for foreigners. These characteristics are on the whole common to the China's civil procedure and there has some correlationship between North Korea and China.Amazingly enough, China's civil procedure have much resemblances to Korean civil procedure. This resemblances are growing gradually at the case of North Korea and China's civil procedure amendments. When the time come to China's second amendment of civil procedure, this tentative menthod will be more usefal to analyze the correlationship between Northe Korea and China's civil procedure.South and North Korea's political leaders are all maintain 'civil procedure for the people' as the slogan. But actually they did not so work hard as their slogan. China, south and north Korea have to exert to adopt other country's merits.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 법원행정처, "북한의 중재제도 -국가중재재판제도를 중심으로" 법원행정처 1983-19931994

2 "북한의 민사소송제도 세종연구소 편 북한법 제계와 특색" 1994

3 법원행정처, "북한의 개정 민사소송법" 법원행정처 1995

4 "북한사법제도개관" 법원행정처 1996.6

5 강구진, "북한법의 연구" 박영사 1975

6 "북한법에 대한 중국과 소련의 영향" 북한법 연구회 (7) : 2004

7 김홍규, "북한민사소송법의 회고와 전망" 10 : 1995.12

8 김정금리황, "북한민사소송법의 회고와 전망" 김일성종합대학출판사 1987

9 정동윤, "북한민사소송법의 특색과 소田中言行" 社會主義法學硏究年報 : 1991

10 김 철, "공화국재판에 있어서 판사독립의 원칙에 대한 정확한 리해를 위하여" (4) : 1958

11 이춘성, "개정된 북한민사소송법의 분석평가" 44 (44): 1995.2