RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    포괄적 누적 충격 공통원인고장 모형 및 시스템 신뢰도 평가 = Comprehensive Cumulative Shock Common Cause Failure Models and Assessment of System Reliability

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104213672

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This research proposes comprehensive models for analyzing common cause failures (CCF) due to cumulative shocks and to assess system reliability under the CCF. The proposed cumulative shock models are based on the binomial failure rate (BFR) model. Six kinds of models are proposed so as to explain diverse cumulative shock phenomena. The models are composed of the initial failure probability, shape parameter, and the total shock number. Some parameters of the proposed models can not be explicitly estimated, so we adopt the Expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm in order to obtain the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for the parameters. By estimating the parameters for the cumulative shock models, the system reliability with CCF can be assessed sequentially according to the number of cumulative shocks. The result can be utilizes in dynamic probabilistic safety assessment (PSA), aging studies, or risk management for nuclear power plants. Replacement or maintenance policies can also be developed based on the proposed model.
    번역하기

    This research proposes comprehensive models for analyzing common cause failures (CCF) due to cumulative shocks and to assess system reliability under the CCF. The proposed cumulative shock models are based on the binomial failure rate (BFR) model. Six...

    This research proposes comprehensive models for analyzing common cause failures (CCF) due to cumulative shocks and to assess system reliability under the CCF. The proposed cumulative shock models are based on the binomial failure rate (BFR) model. Six kinds of models are proposed so as to explain diverse cumulative shock phenomena. The models are composed of the initial failure probability, shape parameter, and the total shock number. Some parameters of the proposed models can not be explicitly estimated, so we adopt the Expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm in order to obtain the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for the parameters. By estimating the parameters for the cumulative shock models, the system reliability with CCF can be assessed sequentially according to the number of cumulative shocks. The result can be utilizes in dynamic probabilistic safety assessment (PSA), aging studies, or risk management for nuclear power plants. Replacement or maintenance policies can also be developed based on the proposed model.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Edison, "Zion Probabilistic Safety Study"

    2 Apostolakis, G., "The Found ations of Models of Dependence in PSA" 18 : 177-195, 1987

    3 Garrick, "Seabrook Station Probabilistic Safety Study, PL&G, PLG-0300, Public Service Co. of New Hampshire and Yankee Atomic Electric Company"

    4 Mosleh, A., "Procedures for Treating Common Cause Failures in Safety and Reliability Studies"

    5 Picard, Lowe, "Preliminary Review of the Ringhals 2 Probabilistic Safety Study"

    6 Evans, M.G., "On The Treatment of Common Cause Failures in Systems Analysis" 9 (9): 125-136, 1983

    7 Dempster, A. P., "Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm" 39 : 1-22, 1977

    8 Vaurio, J.K., "Common-Cause Failure Model, Data, Quantification" 48 (48): 213-214, 1999

    9 Moody, J.H., "Common Cause Modeling of Reactor Trip Breaker Configuration" 3 : 1985

    10 Fleming, K. N., "A Reliability Model for Common Mode Failures in Redundant Safety Systems, General Atomic Report GA-A13284" 23-25, 1975

    1 Edison, "Zion Probabilistic Safety Study"

    2 Apostolakis, G., "The Found ations of Models of Dependence in PSA" 18 : 177-195, 1987

    3 Garrick, "Seabrook Station Probabilistic Safety Study, PL&G, PLG-0300, Public Service Co. of New Hampshire and Yankee Atomic Electric Company"

    4 Mosleh, A., "Procedures for Treating Common Cause Failures in Safety and Reliability Studies"

    5 Picard, Lowe, "Preliminary Review of the Ringhals 2 Probabilistic Safety Study"

    6 Evans, M.G., "On The Treatment of Common Cause Failures in Systems Analysis" 9 (9): 125-136, 1983

    7 Dempster, A. P., "Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm" 39 : 1-22, 1977

    8 Vaurio, J.K., "Common-Cause Failure Model, Data, Quantification" 48 (48): 213-214, 1999

    9 Moody, J.H., "Common Cause Modeling of Reactor Trip Breaker Configuration" 3 : 1985

    10 Fleming, K. N., "A Reliability Model for Common Mode Failures in Redundant Safety Systems, General Atomic Report GA-A13284" 23-25, 1975

    11 Mosleh, A., "A Multi-Parameter, Event-Based Common- Cause Failure Model" 1987

    12 백장현, "2단계 EM 알고리즘을 이용한 공통원인 고장 분석" 한국경영과학회 30 (30): 63-72, 2005

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-07-01 등재 등재후보로 하락(현장점검) (기타) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-03 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.88 0.88 0.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.93 1 0.751 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼