RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      신돈 집권기 전민추정도감의 설치와 그 성격

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100559594

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The constitution of Jeonminchujeongdogam(田民推整都監) was regard as his inclination to reform by some students, for long time. They have understood that the policy of Jeonminchujeon was the attempt to protect the peasant from the powerful who snatched a land from the peasant and made them into own servant. Of course, there are the counter argument of the understanding.
      Though debate, I think that there were not the full research of Jeonminchujeongdogam. Without the research, its meaning was argued and debated. This paper start from the critical mind. I will study the constitution and object of Jeonminchujeongdogam.
      Jeonminchujeongdogam was founded in the May 1366, when King Gong-Min reorganized the Hyenginchujeongdogam(刑人推整都監) to Jeonminchujeongdogam. Hyenginchujeongdogam was founded, a year ago, in order to solve the drought and unfair trial, then was reorganized to Jeonminchujeongdogam. But that purpose was nominal. The real purpose was the control of the officials who had served to the Koryo Dynasty. Especially, the reorganizaton to Jeonminchujeongdogam aimed to the use of the peoples sentiment that always desired the land and servants. By Jeonminchujeongdogam, Shin-don was to get the peoples support, then to contorl the officials.
      Because of the lack of material, I couldnt reaserch the organization of Jeonminchujeongdogam, but some partial material introduced the precious knowledge to me. Shin-don was the prime minister of Jeonminchujeongdogam, Lim-bak became the person in charge of the organization. Lee, In-im and Lee, Chun-bu who served to the other office, sometimes, attent to Jeonminchujeongdogam, conduct their own task.
      Jeonminchujeongdogam has a distinguished feature from previous Jeonminbyenjeongdogam. The former had the forced power, while the latter did not. The officials of Jeonminchujeongdogam had power to carry out the punishment.
      Jeonminchujeongdogam which was founded in 1366, deconstructed in 1370, in the reason of the bad climate. But it was nominal, the essential reason was that Shin-don was be ousted from power.
      번역하기

      The constitution of Jeonminchujeongdogam(田民推整都監) was regard as his inclination to reform by some students, for long time. They have understood that the policy of Jeonminchujeon was the attempt to protect the peasant from the powerful who s...

      The constitution of Jeonminchujeongdogam(田民推整都監) was regard as his inclination to reform by some students, for long time. They have understood that the policy of Jeonminchujeon was the attempt to protect the peasant from the powerful who snatched a land from the peasant and made them into own servant. Of course, there are the counter argument of the understanding.
      Though debate, I think that there were not the full research of Jeonminchujeongdogam. Without the research, its meaning was argued and debated. This paper start from the critical mind. I will study the constitution and object of Jeonminchujeongdogam.
      Jeonminchujeongdogam was founded in the May 1366, when King Gong-Min reorganized the Hyenginchujeongdogam(刑人推整都監) to Jeonminchujeongdogam. Hyenginchujeongdogam was founded, a year ago, in order to solve the drought and unfair trial, then was reorganized to Jeonminchujeongdogam. But that purpose was nominal. The real purpose was the control of the officials who had served to the Koryo Dynasty. Especially, the reorganizaton to Jeonminchujeongdogam aimed to the use of the peoples sentiment that always desired the land and servants. By Jeonminchujeongdogam, Shin-don was to get the peoples support, then to contorl the officials.
      Because of the lack of material, I couldnt reaserch the organization of Jeonminchujeongdogam, but some partial material introduced the precious knowledge to me. Shin-don was the prime minister of Jeonminchujeongdogam, Lim-bak became the person in charge of the organization. Lee, In-im and Lee, Chun-bu who served to the other office, sometimes, attent to Jeonminchujeongdogam, conduct their own task.
      Jeonminchujeongdogam has a distinguished feature from previous Jeonminbyenjeongdogam. The former had the forced power, while the latter did not. The officials of Jeonminchujeongdogam had power to carry out the punishment.
      Jeonminchujeongdogam which was founded in 1366, deconstructed in 1370, in the reason of the bad climate. But it was nominal, the essential reason was that Shin-don was be ousted from power.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김일권, "「고려사」의 자연학과 오행지 역주" 한국학중앙연구원출판부 2011

      2 최진묵, "한대 수술학 연구 : 한대인의 천·지·인 이해와 그 활용" 서울대학교 대학원 2002

      3 신은제, "원종충렬왕대 전민변정사업의 성격" 한국중세사학회 (21) : 73-110, 2006

      4 주석환, "신돈의 집권과 실각" 30 : 1986

      5 민현구, "신돈의 집권과 그 정치적 성격" 38·40 : 1968

      6 김광철, "신돈과 옥천사지" 창녕군·창원대학교 경남학연구센터 2014

      7 김광철, "권문세족과 신진사대부" 국사편찬위원회 19 : 1996

      8 이익주, "공민왕대 개혁의 추이와 신흥유신의 성장" 15 : 1995

      9 김창현, "공민왕~우왕대의 정치·사회의 변동" 34 : 2003

      10 신은제, "공민왕 즉위초 정국의 동향과 전민변정" 한국중세사학회 (29) : 371-400, 2010

      1 김일권, "「고려사」의 자연학과 오행지 역주" 한국학중앙연구원출판부 2011

      2 최진묵, "한대 수술학 연구 : 한대인의 천·지·인 이해와 그 활용" 서울대학교 대학원 2002

      3 신은제, "원종충렬왕대 전민변정사업의 성격" 한국중세사학회 (21) : 73-110, 2006

      4 주석환, "신돈의 집권과 실각" 30 : 1986

      5 민현구, "신돈의 집권과 그 정치적 성격" 38·40 : 1968

      6 김광철, "신돈과 옥천사지" 창녕군·창원대학교 경남학연구센터 2014

      7 김광철, "권문세족과 신진사대부" 국사편찬위원회 19 : 1996

      8 이익주, "공민왕대 개혁의 추이와 신흥유신의 성장" 15 : 1995

      9 김창현, "공민왕~우왕대의 정치·사회의 변동" 34 : 2003

      10 신은제, "공민왕 즉위초 정국의 동향과 전민변정" 한국중세사학회 (29) : 371-400, 2010

      11 강은경, "고려후기 신돈의 정치개혁과 이상국가" (9) : 2000

      12 "고려사절요"

      13 채웅석, "고려사 형법지의 역주" 신서원 2009

      14 "고려사"

      15 김용선, "고려묘지명집성" 한림대학교 아시아문화연구소 2001

      16 홍영의, "고려말 정치사 연구" 혜안 120-122, 2005

      17 김창현, "고려말 불교의 경향과 문수신앙의 대두" 한국사상사학회 (23) : 281-320, 2004

      18 김영수, "건국의 정치: 여말선초, 혁명과 문명전환" 이학사 239-315, 2006

      19 石川重雄, "高麗時代の 恤刑獄空を中心に" 민족문화연구소 2007 (2007): 255-279, 2007

      20 신은제, "14세기 전반 원의 정국동향과 고려의 정치도감" 한국중세사학회 (26) : 191-231, 2009

      21 김기덕, "14세기 고려의 정치와 사회" 민음사 1994

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.52 0.52 0.56
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.65 0.67 1.012 0.29
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼