RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    한국 사회복지학의 정체성  :  역사적 특수성과 가능성을 중심으로 = The Identity of Social Welfare Studies in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3303654

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper explores the identity of social welfare studies in Korea, that are now being taught in more than 60 colleges and universities mainly at the undergraduate level. The points are made from a comparative historical perspective, that social welfare studies in Korea is unique in its scope and breadth of concern it covers as well as in the socio-political status of the leading academicians with social welfare background as compared with cases in the U.S., U.K., Japan, and Germany.
    Social welfare studies in Korea incorporates not only thee professional model of American social work, but also the notion of German social policy and British social administration. Japan is the case where social policy and social work are completely separate with little communication. And unlike the case of the U.S., the U.K. and Japan, not to mention Germany, all the major leading universities in Korea have the department of social welfare and usually have academic Ph.D. programs. In terms of the higher education administration, social welfare studies in Korea is structured as a part of main stram social science studies, which is not the case where social work is educated at the professional schools, if not the vocational schools.
    Despite of these relatively favorable features of social welfare studies in Korea, however, it is quite weak as an independent and coherent academic discipline. Four issues of disciplinary identity have been taken: 1) independence versus interdependence from and with other related disciplines; 2) internal consistency as a systematic body of knowledge, for instance between clinical social work and policy analysis; 3) relevance of theory and practice, balance between science and art; 4) the issue of cultural indigenousness and generality versus specificity.
    번역하기

    This paper explores the identity of social welfare studies in Korea, that are now being taught in more than 60 colleges and universities mainly at the undergraduate level. The points are made from a comparative historical perspective, that social welf...

    This paper explores the identity of social welfare studies in Korea, that are now being taught in more than 60 colleges and universities mainly at the undergraduate level. The points are made from a comparative historical perspective, that social welfare studies in Korea is unique in its scope and breadth of concern it covers as well as in the socio-political status of the leading academicians with social welfare background as compared with cases in the U.S., U.K., Japan, and Germany.
    Social welfare studies in Korea incorporates not only thee professional model of American social work, but also the notion of German social policy and British social administration. Japan is the case where social policy and social work are completely separate with little communication. And unlike the case of the U.S., the U.K. and Japan, not to mention Germany, all the major leading universities in Korea have the department of social welfare and usually have academic Ph.D. programs. In terms of the higher education administration, social welfare studies in Korea is structured as a part of main stram social science studies, which is not the case where social work is educated at the professional schools, if not the vocational schools.
    Despite of these relatively favorable features of social welfare studies in Korea, however, it is quite weak as an independent and coherent academic discipline. Four issues of disciplinary identity have been taken: 1) independence versus interdependence from and with other related disciplines; 2) internal consistency as a systematic body of knowledge, for instance between clinical social work and policy analysis; 3) relevance of theory and practice, balance between science and art; 4) the issue of cultural indigenousness and generality versus specificity.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼