RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      통합교과 교수방법론 = A Study on the Teaching Method of Integrated Subjects

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40106335

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study was to make a attempt to reconceptualize the concept of Curriculum integration which by this time has been confused and to propose the teaching method of integrated subjects which can not be separated from that concept of curriculum integration The results of this study are as the follows: this study found out ` interiorazation`-integration into the learner`s mind-, as the new concept of curriculum integration, and then extracted the 4 stage of teaching method, in term of Herbart, 1)clearness, 2)association, 3)system, 4)method from the dynamic process of mind implied in `interiorazation`. As the first stage, clearness is to secede concept which teacher wants to deliver right now, from the related whole knowledges, and to make students attentive to that separated concept. As the second stage, association is to try to relate that separated and noticed concept, as broadly as possible, with knowledges which have been already integrated in student`s mind. As the third stage, system is to aid that noticed and broadened concept to have a meaningful place in the whole knowledge system of student. As the last stage, method is to give students a chance of the exercises so as to make that broadened and newly placed concept more stable than the past state of that concept. On the other hand, above all in the situation of instruction which put the 4 stage of teaching method into action, teachefs position and role is very important. Because true `contextualization of knowledge` means that teacher has comprehended integrated subjects for himself, as fully as he shows a good example of the integrated knowledges.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to make a attempt to reconceptualize the concept of Curriculum integration which by this time has been confused and to propose the teaching method of integrated subjects which can not be separated from that concept of cur...

      The purpose of this study was to make a attempt to reconceptualize the concept of Curriculum integration which by this time has been confused and to propose the teaching method of integrated subjects which can not be separated from that concept of curriculum integration The results of this study are as the follows: this study found out ` interiorazation`-integration into the learner`s mind-, as the new concept of curriculum integration, and then extracted the 4 stage of teaching method, in term of Herbart, 1)clearness, 2)association, 3)system, 4)method from the dynamic process of mind implied in `interiorazation`. As the first stage, clearness is to secede concept which teacher wants to deliver right now, from the related whole knowledges, and to make students attentive to that separated concept. As the second stage, association is to try to relate that separated and noticed concept, as broadly as possible, with knowledges which have been already integrated in student`s mind. As the third stage, system is to aid that noticed and broadened concept to have a meaningful place in the whole knowledge system of student. As the last stage, method is to give students a chance of the exercises so as to make that broadened and newly placed concept more stable than the past state of that concept. On the other hand, above all in the situation of instruction which put the 4 stage of teaching method into action, teachefs position and role is very important. Because true `contextualization of knowledge` means that teacher has comprehended integrated subjects for himself, as fully as he shows a good example of the integrated knowledges.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이환기, "헤르바르트의 교수이론" 교육과학사 1998

      2 이영만, "통합교육과정" 학지사 2001

      3 유한구, "초등학교 통합교과 교육론" 교육과학사 1998

      4 교육부, "바른 생활, 슬기로운 생활, 즐거운 생활, 우리들은 1학년 교육과정." 국정교과서주식회사. 1997

      5 김승호, "교육의 자득적 측면" 83 : 36-41, 1997

      6 Pring, "The philosophy of education" Oxford University Press 1978

      7 Pring, "The philosophy of education" Oxford University Press 1978

      8 Fogarty, R., "How to integrate the curricula." Skylight Publishing, Inc. 1991

      9 Ingram,J.B, "Curriculum integration and lifelong education" UNESCO 1979

      10 Beane,J.A, "Curriculum integration" Columbia University 1997

      1 이환기, "헤르바르트의 교수이론" 교육과학사 1998

      2 이영만, "통합교육과정" 학지사 2001

      3 유한구, "초등학교 통합교과 교육론" 교육과학사 1998

      4 교육부, "바른 생활, 슬기로운 생활, 즐거운 생활, 우리들은 1학년 교육과정." 국정교과서주식회사. 1997

      5 김승호, "교육의 자득적 측면" 83 : 36-41, 1997

      6 Pring, "The philosophy of education" Oxford University Press 1978

      7 Pring, "The philosophy of education" Oxford University Press 1978

      8 Fogarty, R., "How to integrate the curricula." Skylight Publishing, Inc. 1991

      9 Ingram,J.B, "Curriculum integration and lifelong education" UNESCO 1979

      10 Beane,J.A, "Curriculum integration" Columbia University 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.84 1.84 1.82
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.82 1.8 2.264 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼