[단행본] 한국어 문법형태 연구

국문 초록 (Abstract)

책을 펴내면서 = 5
Ⅰ. 격조사의 기능에 관한 인지의미론적 연구 = 13
1. 서론 = 15
1.1. 연구목적 = 16
1.2. 선행연구 검토 = 19
1.2.1. 격에 대한 논의 = 20
1.2.2. '조사'의 용어에 대한 논의 = 24
1.2.3. 격조사에 대한 논의 = 26
1.3. 연구방법 및 연구범위 = 27
1.3.1. 연구방법으로서의 인지의미론 = 28
1.3.2. 연구범위 = 33
2. 격의 개념과 격조사의 기능 = 35
2.1. 통사적 관점에서의 격의 개념 = 36
2.2. 격조사의 기능 = 38
2.2.1. 격조사의 격기능 = 38
2.2.2. 격조사의 의미기능 = 49
3. 격조사의 전형성 = 56
3.1. 격조사의 격기능에 따른 전형성 = 58
3.2. 격조사의 의미기능에 따른 전형성 = 65
3.3. 관용어에서 나타나는 격조사의 전형성 = 86
3.4. 조사의 상호결합에서 나타나는 격조사의 전형성 = 86
4. 격조사의 비실현과 생략의 전형성 = 94
4.1. 주격, 목적격조사의 비실현과 생략의 전형성 = 97
4.2. 부사격조사의 비실현과 생략의 전형성 = 100
5. 결론 = 109
Ⅱ. 한국어 교육에서의 격조사 교육에 관한 인지의미론적 연구 = 119
1. 서론 = 121
1.1. 연구목적 = 121
1.2. 연구방법 = 123
2. 한국어 격조사의 기능 = 125
2.1. 격조사의 격기능 = 128
2.2. 격조사의 의미기능 = 132
3. 격조사 교수모형 = 136
3.1. 정규교과과정에서의 교수모형 = 137
3.2. 단기교과과정에서의 교수모형 = 141
4. 결론 = 143
Ⅲ. 인칭접미사 '-이'에 대한 인지의미론적 연구 = 147
1. 서론 = 149
1.1. 연구목적 및 연구방법 = 150
1.2. 기존의 연구 및 문제점 = 151
2. 인칭접미사 '-이'의 의미기능 = 153
2.1. '-이'와 어말어미의 결합관계 = 154
2.2. '-이'와 공손체와의 결합관계 = 157
2.3. '-이'와 외국인명과의 결합관계 = 159
2.4. 호격조사와 결합한 경우 = 161
2.5. 중세국어에서 속격조사와 결합한 경우 = 163
3. 인칭접미사 '-이'와 명사파생접미사 '-이'와 불완전명사 '이' = 164
3.1. 명사파생 접미사 '-이'의 세 유형 = 164
3.2. 인칭접미사 '-이'와 명사파생접미사 '-이'와의 연관성 = 165
3.3. 인칭접미사 '-이'와 불완전명사 '이'와의 연관성 = 166
3.4. 인칭접미사 '-이'에서 명사파생접미사 '-이'와 불완전명사 '이'로의 확장 = 167
4. 결론 = 169
Ⅳ. {-에}와 {-에서}에 관한 구조주의적 연구 = 171
1. 서론 = 173
1.1. 연구범위와 연구목적 = 173
1.2. 연구방법 = 177
1.3. 선행 연구에 대한 개관 = 179
2. 본론 = 182
2.1. {-에}와 {-에게}, {-께}의 통시적 연구 = 182
2.2. {-에}와 {-에서}의 차이점 = 186
2.3. {-에}의 의미 = 190
2.3.1. 동작동사와 공기하는 경우 = 194
2.3.2. 상태동사와 공기하는 경우 = 198
2.3.3. 존재동사와 공기하는 경우 = 201
2.3.4. 지정동사와 공기하는 경우 = 203
2.3.5. {-에}의 기본 의미기능 = 204
2.4. {-에서}에서 {-서}의 의미 = 205
2.4.1. 동작동사와 공기하는 경우 = 208
2.4.2. 상태동사와 공기하는 경우 = 215
2.4.3. 존재동사와 공기하는 경우 = 219
2.4.4. 지정동사와 공기하는 경우 = 220
2.4.5. {-에서}에서 {-서}의 기본 의미기능 = 221
2.5. {-에}가 삭제될 수 있는 경우 = 222
2.6. {-서}가 삭제될 수 있는 경우 = 226
3. 결론 = 228
참고문헌 = 231

국문 초록 (Abstract)

언어연구의 이론적 틀인 구조주의 문법과 인지문법으로 한국어의 현상을 어떻게 설명하고 연구할 수 있는지를 보여주는 책. 한국어의 여러 현상 중에서 첨가어인 한국어의 특성을 가장 잘 나타내주는 문법형태 중 격조사와 인칭접미사를 다루었다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This dissertation explores various functions of case particles in Korean within the framework of Cognitive Semantics. In particular, they are examined against the non-prototype (or subsidiary) as well as the prototype meanings of the sentences.
I define the notion of case syntactically: the qualification which a nominal bears to the central word in the sentence. This means that cases in the sentence are realized not by the case particles but by the notion of the case, and that if the case particles appear in sentences, they manifest not only the notion of case but also the functions or meanings of the cases.
The major claims of this dissertation are as follows.
(1) The case particles manifest both the case of the preceding nominal and their own meaning:
Principle 1: When the case particles manifest the case of the preceding nominal
When a sentence has the canonical word order and the cases are predictable, the case particles are not realized. On the other hand, the case particles are always realized when a sentence has non-canonical word order, or when cases are not predictable by the confusion due to the sentence structure.
Principle 2: When the case particles manifest their own meanings
The case particles manifest their own meanings as well as the cases. The nominative and accusative. particles express their own meaning if they are in a sentence where the cases of the nominals are predictable and thus they should not visible in general. In cases of adverbial case particles, they do not appear in a sentence if they express the case only. However, they should be manifested if the omission of the particles results in an ill-formed sentence. In such cases, the adverbial particles express both case and their own meaning.
(2) Not all the case particles have the same status in expressing the case. That is, there are prototype effects.
Principle 3: The prototype concerning the case function of the case particles

(notion of the case) > nominative and accusative particles > adverbial particles

Not all the case particles have the same status in expressing the case. The prototypical particles such as nominative and accusative have a relatively strong function of expressing the case, whereas adverbial particles such as locative, instrumental and conjunctive have a relatively weak and subsidiary function of the case. These particles also have a certain function of expressing their meaning.
Principle 4: The prototype concerning the meaning of the case particles

accusative > nominative > locative > instrumental > conjunctive

The accusative particle is the typical particle in expressing its meaning. The nominative particle is another typical particle in the sense that it also expresses its meaning. Among the adverbial particles, the conjunctive particle is the most peripheral particle in expressing the meaning, and the locative particle is in the middle among the particles.
Principle 5: The prototype of the case particles in idioms and fixed expressions
In idioms and proverbs, nominals and verbs form a very close relation, which brings about non-compositional meanings [논문의 내용상 이렇게 바꾸면 문제가 되는지?]. For this reason, we can observe that many particles are not realized between the nominals and verbs in order not to block such a close relationship of the words. However, we also see that prototypical particles such as nominative and accusative are not realized in most cases, whereas adverbial particles, which are subsidiary in expressing the case, are manifested in those expressions.
Principle 6: The prototype in the combinations of the particles

a. * subjective/objective + adverbial
* subjective/objective + auxiliary

The nominative and accusative particles, which are typical case particles and thus easily predictable, are never followed by another particle.

b. adverbial + subjective/objective
adverbial + auxiliary
adverbial + auxiliary + subjective/objective

The adverbial particles, which are also case particles, should not appear in the sentence when predictable, but since they also carry certain meanings of their own, they should be manifested in the sentence. The subjective and objective particles preceded by an adverbial particle, though they are optional, could carry a certain meaning as in the case where an auxiliary particle is preceded by an adverbial particle.

c. adverbial + adverbial

When the two adverbial particles combine together, the first particle bears both the case function and meaning, but the second carries only the meaning. This is because the first particle of the two successive particles manifests the case of the preceding nominal. For this reason, the adverbial particle that appears in the first position followed by another particle must be realized because it carries the case of the preceding nominal.

d. *auxiliary + adverbial

This combination is not allowed because the adverbial particle preceded by an auxiliary particle must carry only the meaning. Note that the adverbial particle always carries both the case function and meaning.

e. auxiliary + subjective/objective

When a subjective or an objective particle is preceded by an auxiliary particle, they do not carry the function of case, but they carry their own meaning.
(3) The prototype of non-realization and omission of the case particle
The subjective, objective and locative particles may not be realized or omitted in the prototype and non-prototype sentences, while the instrumental and conjunctive particles are not easily omitted in the same cases.
Principle 7: The prototype of non-realization and omission of the case particle
All case particles can be omitted according to the prototype of their functions. The nominative and accusative particles can be omitted easily when the condition is met. The locative particle can also be omitted. However, the instrumental and conjunctive particles will not easily be omitted.
The main points of this dissertation are schematically represented in the following table.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

기관저자 해당사항 없음