RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    초점사건 중심 정책변동 모형의 탐색 -「한국의 아동 성폭력 사건 이후 정책변동」을 중심으로- = Exploration of Focusing Event Related Policy Change Model: The Case Studies of A Series of Child Sexual Violence Events and Policy Change in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82675969

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Although there are many theories to explain policy change, we can not find relevant framework to explain the sudden policy change by focusing events. In real world, there are many policy change cases which are caused by focusing events. Therefore this study try to make the model or the framework to understand how focusing events affect policy process and change the policy. For this, this study analysis the policy change process after child sexual violence accidents based on the event-related policy change model. Focusing event raised a public interest and became social issue, and open policy window. Each event provide policy ideas and information to policy makers but this policy learning is enable to or not to lead policy change. This study focus on the what factors or conditions make difference to policy change and policy failure to analysis a series of child sexual violence events. We applied Birklnad’s ‘event related policy change model’ to three chain of events; 1) 2008.12 Cho, Doo-sun, case 2) 2010. 02 Kim, Gil-tae. cases, and 3) 2010, 06. Kim. Soo-chul case. Another our purpose of study is modifying Birkland’s model and building policy change model to explain well Korean policy phenomena. The results suggest us two implications; The first, policy change cause by the degree of emotional shock to people as well as the extents of physical damage. The second, focusing events didn’t bring a radical change in policy, they prefer to incremental approach. But the policy learning through a series of events finally adopt stricter and coersive policy tools which caused controversy.
    번역하기

    Although there are many theories to explain policy change, we can not find relevant framework to explain the sudden policy change by focusing events. In real world, there are many policy change cases which are caused by focusing events. Therefore this...

    Although there are many theories to explain policy change, we can not find relevant framework to explain the sudden policy change by focusing events. In real world, there are many policy change cases which are caused by focusing events. Therefore this study try to make the model or the framework to understand how focusing events affect policy process and change the policy. For this, this study analysis the policy change process after child sexual violence accidents based on the event-related policy change model. Focusing event raised a public interest and became social issue, and open policy window. Each event provide policy ideas and information to policy makers but this policy learning is enable to or not to lead policy change. This study focus on the what factors or conditions make difference to policy change and policy failure to analysis a series of child sexual violence events. We applied Birklnad’s ‘event related policy change model’ to three chain of events; 1) 2008.12 Cho, Doo-sun, case 2) 2010. 02 Kim, Gil-tae. cases, and 3) 2010, 06. Kim. Soo-chul case. Another our purpose of study is modifying Birkland’s model and building policy change model to explain well Korean policy phenomena. The results suggest us two implications; The first, policy change cause by the degree of emotional shock to people as well as the extents of physical damage. The second, focusing events didn’t bring a radical change in policy, they prefer to incremental approach. But the policy learning through a series of events finally adopt stricter and coersive policy tools which caused controversy.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국언론진흥재단 기사통합검색"

    2 정혜진, "제도설계와 정책효과: 베이지언(Bayesian) 게임이론을 통한 청소년 대상 성범죄자의 신상공개제도의 정책효과분석" 한국정책분석평가학회 20 (20): 165-188, 2010

    3 유훈, "정책학원론" 법문사 2002

    4 유훈, "정책변동론" 대영문화사 2009

    5 법무부 여성정책연구원, "아동성폭력 재범방지 및 아동보호 대책" 2008

    6 "네이버 뉴스 검색"

    7 "국회 회의록 시스템"

    8 "국회 의안정보 시스템"

    9 "국회 미디어 자료관"

    10 대검찰청, "검찰연감" 2006

    1 "한국언론진흥재단 기사통합검색"

    2 정혜진, "제도설계와 정책효과: 베이지언(Bayesian) 게임이론을 통한 청소년 대상 성범죄자의 신상공개제도의 정책효과분석" 한국정책분석평가학회 20 (20): 165-188, 2010

    3 유훈, "정책학원론" 법문사 2002

    4 유훈, "정책변동론" 대영문화사 2009

    5 법무부 여성정책연구원, "아동성폭력 재범방지 및 아동보호 대책" 2008

    6 "네이버 뉴스 검색"

    7 "국회 회의록 시스템"

    8 "국회 의안정보 시스템"

    9 "국회 미디어 자료관"

    10 대검찰청, "검찰연감" 2006

    11 Edwards Ⅲ, George C., "Who Influences Whom? The President,Congress, and the Media" 93 (93): 326-344, 1999

    12 Jenkins-Smith, H., "The Study of Public Policy Processes, in Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach" Westview Press 1-9, 1993

    13 Nohrstedt, Daniel, "The Poltics of crisis Policymaking:Chernobyl and Swedish Nuclear Energy policy" 36 (36): 257-278, 2008

    14 Jones, Bryan D., "Politics and the Architecture of Choice:Bounded Rationality and Governance" University of Chicago Press 2001

    15 Sabatier, Paul A., "Political Science and Public Policy" 24 (24): 144-147, 1991

    16 May, Peter J., "Policy learning and Failure" 12 (12): 331-354, 1992

    17 Sabatier, Paul A., "Policy Change over a Decade or more, in Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach" Westview Press 13-39, 1993

    18 Birkland, Thomas A., "Our political system will keep doing its job" 30 : B1-, 2001

    19 Birkland, Thomas A., "Lessons of Disaster:Policy Change After Catastrophic Events" Georgetown University Press 2006

    20 Busenberg, G. J., "Learning in Organizations and Public Policy" 21 : 173-189, 2001

    21 Levy, J., "Learning and foreign policy:Sweeping a conceptual minefield" 48 : 279-312, 1994

    22 Sabatier, Paul A., "Knowledge,Policy-Oriented Learning,and Policy Change" 8 : 649-692, 1987

    23 Birkland, Thomas A., "Handbook of Public Policy Analysis" CRC Press 2006

    24 Birkland, Thomas A., "Focusing events, mobilization,and agenda setting" 18 (18): 53-74, 1998

    25 Birkland, Thomas A., "Disasters,Lessons Learned,and Fantasy Documents" 17 (17): 146-156, 2009

    26 Kingdon, John W., "Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (2nd ed.)" Harper Collins 1995

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.69 1.69 1.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.83 1.8 1.759 0.69
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼