RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    HR 프로그램의 절차적 ROI 프로세스 모델 개발 = Design of the procedural ROI Process Model for Human Resources programs

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959609

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Today, accelerated technical development after the Industrial Revolution requires ceaseless survival efforts to adapt itself to new business circumstances. Especially, in high level of information-knowledge society, the concept of the education also is investment is gathering strength while the importance of the Human Resources at enterprises is more being emphasized than any other times. Therefore, with the increasing expenses in the field of HR, it has been on the increase for the need for the model to be able to evaluate Return On Investment in the field of HR. So, the procedural ROI process model is developed through this study which can obtain consistent results under the general principles of ROI process by using systematic procedure and method, and excludes the complexity of analysis method and the possibility of subjective variableness by the Phillips` ROI model. Cases mentioned in literature are made the comparative study of the results of analysis for verification of reliability and validity of the procedural ROI process model developed in this way. And the field study was also carried out. In results of the comparative study and the field study, there was seen difference only about zero to six percent between the developed model and Phillips` model. And all the processes of evaluating ROI were worked out organically and systematically. This was very encouraging result to consider estimated parts that had been involved unavoidably in ROI process.
    번역하기

    Today, accelerated technical development after the Industrial Revolution requires ceaseless survival efforts to adapt itself to new business circumstances. Especially, in high level of information-knowledge society, the concept of the education also i...

    Today, accelerated technical development after the Industrial Revolution requires ceaseless survival efforts to adapt itself to new business circumstances. Especially, in high level of information-knowledge society, the concept of the education also is investment is gathering strength while the importance of the Human Resources at enterprises is more being emphasized than any other times. Therefore, with the increasing expenses in the field of HR, it has been on the increase for the need for the model to be able to evaluate Return On Investment in the field of HR. So, the procedural ROI process model is developed through this study which can obtain consistent results under the general principles of ROI process by using systematic procedure and method, and excludes the complexity of analysis method and the possibility of subjective variableness by the Phillips` ROI model. Cases mentioned in literature are made the comparative study of the results of analysis for verification of reliability and validity of the procedural ROI process model developed in this way. And the field study was also carried out. In results of the comparative study and the field study, there was seen difference only about zero to six percent between the developed model and Phillips` model. And all the processes of evaluating ROI were worked out organically and systematically. This was very encouraging result to consider estimated parts that had been involved unavoidably in ROI process.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "교육비용 계산 핸드북" 다산서고 2004

    2 "Training Cost Analysis" American Society for Training and Development 1994

    3 "Trainee Characteristics and Outcomes of Open Learning" 48 : 347-375, 1995

    4 "The Relationship Between Trainee Responses on Participation Relation Forms and Posttest Scores" 129-137, 1990

    5 "The Human Resources Scorecard: Measuring the Return on Investment" Butterworth-Heinemann 2001

    6 "Kirkpatrick의 4단계 평가 모델에 따른 기업내 웹 기반 교육의 학습 효과 평가" 2 (2): 2000

    7 "In Search of Excellence" 1982

    8 "Handbook of Training Evaluation and Measurement Methods, 3rd ed" Gulf Publishing Company 1997

    9 "Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels, 2nd ed" Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc 1998

    10 "Evaluating E-learning" American Society for Training and Development 2001

    1 "교육비용 계산 핸드북" 다산서고 2004

    2 "Training Cost Analysis" American Society for Training and Development 1994

    3 "Trainee Characteristics and Outcomes of Open Learning" 48 : 347-375, 1995

    4 "The Relationship Between Trainee Responses on Participation Relation Forms and Posttest Scores" 129-137, 1990

    5 "The Human Resources Scorecard: Measuring the Return on Investment" Butterworth-Heinemann 2001

    6 "Kirkpatrick의 4단계 평가 모델에 따른 기업내 웹 기반 교육의 학습 효과 평가" 2 (2): 2000

    7 "In Search of Excellence" 1982

    8 "Handbook of Training Evaluation and Measurement Methods, 3rd ed" Gulf Publishing Company 1997

    9 "Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels, 2nd ed" Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc 1998

    10 "Evaluating E-learning" American Society for Training and Development 2001

    11 "A Practical Approach to Evaluating Corporate Training Programs" Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

    12 "A Meta-Analysis of Relations among Training Criteria" 50 : 341-358, 1997

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼